Original article
Normalization of the Constant score

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.009Get rights and content

The strength of the normal shoulder may differ by gender and deteriorate with age. Thus, the Constant score may also decrease in absolute value while still reflecting a normal score. To account for age- and gender-related differences, normal results for this scale must be determined across a population of patients without shoulder disease. Patients presenting for evaluation of nonshoulder conditions participated. A subjective questionnaire was completed. Range of motion and strength were measured. This analysis includes the data of 441 patients. The mean Constant score for men was significantly greater than that for women in each age group (P < .05). Significant age-related differences were noted in each group (P < .05). Normative values for the Constant score based on age and gender were determined. The adjusted score represents the gender- and age-matched function of the shoulder and is useful in the evaluation of shoulder outcomes.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All patients underwent an informed consent process approved by the Institutional Review Board and Human Subjects Committee of Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, IL). Four hundred eighty patients presenting to a sports medicine clinic for evaluation of nonshoulder conditions participated in clinical testing that would allow the determination of the Constant score for the dominant shoulder. All participants were carefully screened by the examiner to determine the existence of current or

Results

Four hundred eighty patients were evaluated. Five were aged less than 18 years, and thirty-nine were not included in the analysis because of data that were either missing or not able to be read by the scanner. Our results are based on complete data from 441 patients (Table III). The mean Constant score for men was significantly greater than that for women in each age group (P < .05) (Figure 2). For men, patients aged older than 70 years had a significantly lower Constant score than those aged

Discussion

A shoulder scoring system serves as a simplified means for the evaluation of a variety of shoulder conditions. It is intended to represent the outcome of intervention without sensitivity to observer bias or bias based on the parameters measured. In addition, it should allow the effective communication of the results of medical and surgical intervention in a patient group. It would, therefore, allow comparison of different therapeutic modalities by defining functional improvement or

References (27)

  • T.D. Cahalan et al.

    Shoulder strength analysis using the Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer

    Clin Orthop

    (1991)
  • P. Codine et al.

    Influence of sports discipline on shoulder rotator cuff balance

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1997)
  • V.B. Conboy et al.

    An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1996)
  • Cited by (275)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text