ElbowThe influence of proximal ulnar morphology on elbow range of motion
Section snippets
Methods
Healthy adult volunteers, who were employees or visitors to a level 1 trauma center, were recruited for this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: aged between 18 and 50 years and no pre-existing elbow pathology in either upper limb. Pregnant women or women who may become pregnant were excluded. Fifty volunteers were recruited for this study according to the guidelines of Harrison et al12 for the radiologic evaluation of measurements.
Standardized lateral elbow radiographs were taken at
Results
The mean age of the cohort was 31 years (SD, 9). There were 30 women among the 50 participants. The mean PUDA of the 100 elbows was 5.2° (range, −0.2° to 11.8°; SD, 2.8°). The radiographic measurements for the entire cohort were as follows: mean TF of 150.8° (range, 140.4° to 159.8°; SD, 4.5°), mean TE of 11.5° (range, −5.5° to 28.4°; SD, 7.3°), and mean ROM of 139.3° (range, 116.0° to 158.4°; SD, 8.4°).
The correlation coefficients between the PUDA and TE, TF, and ROM are presented in Table I.
Discussion
The PUDA was related to elbow extension and global elbow ROM in normal adult subjects. Interestingly, terminal elbow flexion was not affected by changes in the magnitude of the PUDA. It is possible that additional flexion was not seen in the high PUDA group because, unlike extension, TF is limited by soft tissues. To our knowledge, an association between morphologic variations in ulnar anatomy and elbow ROM has not previously been described. The etiology of the variability in the magnitude of
Conclusion
The PUDA was found to be related to the maximal elbow extension and, consequently, ROM. When one is assessing elbow motion, especially after contracture release, knowledge of the contribution of the PUDA to ROM is important. For example, patients with a larger-magnitude ulnar angulation consequently will have less elbow extension.
Disclaimer
The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
References (20)
- et al.
Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(1998) - et al.
Reduced elbow mobility affects the flexion or extension domain in activities of daily living
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
(2011) - et al.
The flat spot of the proximal ulna: a useful anatomic landmark in total elbow arthroplasty
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2004) - et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in the shoulder and wrist joints of asymptomatic elite athletes
PM R
(2009) - et al.
The proximal ulna dorsal angulation: a radiographic study
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2010) - et al.
The proximal ulna: an anatomic study with relevance to olecranon osteotomy and fracture fixation
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2003) - et al.
Madelung’s deformity: a spectrum of presentation
J Hand Surg Am
(2007) - et al.
Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1979) - et al.
Humeral head retroversion in competitive baseball players and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation range of motion
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
(2007) - et al.
Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(2011)
Cited by (25)
Factors affecting outcome of partial radial head fractures: A retrospective cohort study
2019, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et TraumatologiqueFactors affecting outcome of partial radial head fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
2019, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and ResearchComplex coronoid and proximal ulna fractures are we getting better at fixing these?
2016, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Normal angulation of the proximal ulnar dorsum is about 6° measured approximately 5 cm distal from the olecranon. Increasing dorsal angulation can lead to a mechanical block and thus, limit terminal elbow extension [19]. Despite the breadth of information that can be attained from plain radiographic imaging, in the age of advancing technology, there should be a low threshold to obtain a computed tomographic (CT) exam.
Fractures of the proximal forearm
2016, Shoulder and Elbow Trauma and its ComplicationsOlecranon Fractures
2015, Hand ClinicsCitation Excerpt :More recently there has been better understanding of the unique anatomy of the proximal ulna. The sagittal anatomy of proximal ulna is variable but 96% of patients have dorsal angulation, known as the proximal ulnar dorsal angulation, which averages 5.7°.1–3 The proximal ulna also has on average 14° of varus angulation.4
Management of Elbow Trauma: Anatomy and Exposures
2015, Hand ClinicsCitation Excerpt :Most of the fractures affecting the radial head include the lateral or anterolateral fragment lacking cartilage and subchondral bone (Fig. 2). The proximal ulna has a complex anatomy with an average dorsal angulation of 6° and an axial angulation of 10°, which both should be considered when fixing proximal ulna fractures.1 The coronoid acts as a buttress against posterior, posterolateral, and posteromedial displacement.
Institutional review board: Approvals were obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of the ethical committees of Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur (CER 2010-05-43) and École de Technologie Supérieure.