ShoulderPatterns of tear progression for asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears
Section snippets
Methods
Subjects for this study belong to a cohort of individuals with asymptomatic rotator cuff tears that have been observed longitudinally for the purpose of defining the risks of tear enlargement and pain development over time. Subjects presented to the physician with shoulder pain secondary to rotator cuff disease and were found to have an asymptomatic rotator cuff tear in the contralateral shoulder with shoulder ultrasonography. After tear identification, subjects were confirmed to be
Tear propagation analysis
A total of 181 shoulders from the prospective cohort were identified to have a full-thickness cuff tear and a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Forty-two shoulders were excluded because of missing ultrasound data regarding the distance of the tear from the biceps tendon/groove. Therefore, 139 full-thickness tears possessed adequate data and follow-up for tear enlargement analysis. Thirty-three of these shoulders were originally enrolled as partial-thickness tears and 5 were originally designated
Discussion
Understanding common patterns of tear enlargement is fundamental for both surgical indications and surgical repair strategies. To properly illustrate directions of tear enlargement or propagation patterns of tears, a longitudinal analysis is ideal as direct comparisons of changing tear dimensions can be established in a prospective fashion. The asymptomatic cuff tear may also be ideal for this analysis as treatments that may influence disease progression are not rendered, given the tear is
Conclusions
The majority of asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears do not involve the anterior aspect of the supraspinatus tendon. Tears defined as cable disrupted are larger than cable-intact tears. Cable-intact tears appear to propagate in both the anterior and posterior directions, whereas cable-disrupted tears propagate posteriorly within the rotator crescent. The risks, magnitude, and time line of tear progression for cable-intact and cable-disrupted full-thickness tears appear similar, and thus
Disclaimer
Jay D. Keener and Aaron M. Chamberlain have potential conflicts that are not related to the content of this study.
Ken Yamaguchi receives royalties from Tornier for elbow arthroplasty systems and is a design consultant for Zimmer for shoulder arthroplasty.
The other authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
References (25)
- et al.
The rotator crescent and rotator cable: an anatomic description of the shoulder's “suspension bridge”
Arthroscopy
(1993) - et al.
Functional morphology of the supraspinatus tendon
J Orthop Res
(2002) - et al.
Characteristics of small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears with and without disruption of the anterior supraspinatus tendon
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2014) - et al.
A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2014) - et al.
The pathology associated with rupture of the supraspinatus tendon
Ann Surg
(1931) - et al.
Variation in orthopaedic surgeons' perceptions about the indications for rotator cuff surgery
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005) - et al.
Biomechanical comparison of effects of supraspinatus tendon detachments, tendon defects, and muscle retractions
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2002) - et al.
Degenerative change and rotator cuff tears. An anatomical study in 160 shoulders of 80 cadavers
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
(1993) - et al.
Tensile properties of the supraspinatus tendon
J Orthop Res
(1995) - et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging and correlative gross anatomy of the ligamentum semicirculare humeri (rotator cable)
Clin Anat
(2008)
A prospective evaluation of survivorship of asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Observations on rupture of supraspinatus tendon. Based upon a study of seventy-three cadavers
Ann Surg
Cited by (0)
This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health: NIH R01-AR051026.
Institutional Review Board approval for this study was provided by Washington University in St. Louis: No. 201103230.