Elsevier

Spine Deformity

Volume 3, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages 332-337
Spine Deformity

Case Study
At What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Background

Previous studies report that 5% to 17% of pedicle screws placed in children are malpositioned. Knowledge of the long-term effects of malpositioned screws is limited. We sought to further characterize risk factors for malpositioned pedicle screws in order to establish a more proactive role in limiting future complications.

Objective

We undertook this study to answer the following: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often?

Methods

Incidental postoperative computed tomographic (CT) exams were retrospectively reviewed in 85 pediatric patients (605 screws) treated with posterior spinal fusion using freehand pedicle screw technique. Of the screws imaged, 355 were in patients without deformity and 250 in patients with deformity. Breaches were categorized as mild (<2 mm), moderate (2–4 mm), or severe (>4 mm).

Results

Screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned by 2 mm or more than were screws in patients without deformity (26% vs. 19%, p = .02). In patients with deformity, no higher rate of screw malposition was detected at the apical region. Overall, the highest rates of severe screw malposition were between T3 and T8. Pedicle breaches were more commonly in a medial direction compared with lateral (74% vs. 26%, p < .0001). However, severe breaches within the T3–T8 region were more often directed lateral than medial (92% vs. 8%, p ≤ .0001).

Conclusions

The clinical significance of asymptomatic pedicle screw breaches in children has not yet been determined. In this study, screws at the apical concavity were no more likely to be malpositioned than those at other sites. Efforts to reduce pedicle screw malposition would likely be most effective at the T3–T8 levels.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic Study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

Introduction

Pedicle screw fixation has become the preferred instrumentation for the surgical correction of pediatric spine deformity [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Improved fixation, reduced need for anterior surgery, and decreased revision rates are among the advantages of pedicle screws over other forms of posterior spinal instrumentation [2], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Previous clinical success of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar region has led to further use in the thoracic region, despite the anatomic challenges of placing pedicle screws in the thoracic vertebrae [7], [10]. Children with spinal deformity may have altered anatomy, potentially increasing the difficulty of accurate pedicle screw placement [3], [11]. Vascular or neurologic complications of thoracic pedicle screw malposition are rare, and most pedicle perforations are asymptomatic [1], [3], [6], [10]. Recent data suggest minimal long-term effects of malpositioned pedicle screws [12]. Nevertheless, given the potential complications of such breaches, it is in the interest of the patient to reduce the rate of screw malposition.

A variety of strategies and guidance systems are available to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw positioning [1], [2], [5], [13], [14], [15], [16]. However, barriers of cost, training, time efficiency, and radiation exposure may limit the widespread use of navigation and other guidance techniques [5], [14], [17]. Additionally, guidance may not be necessary for all pediatric surgeries or all spinal levels. Knowledge of what diagnoses and which vertebral levels are at highest risk of screw malposition may allow for the most effective use of such devices and may alert the surgeon when additional precautions may be necessary.

From 5% to 17% of all pedicle screws placed in children are thought to be positioned outside the bony confines of the pedicle [4], [8], [18], [19], [20]. There is limited information regarding the levels and direction at which screws are most frequently malpositioned. Some authors have concluded that pedicle screw malposition is more frequent at the apex of scoliotic curves [18], whereas others have noted more frequent malposition in the midthoracic spine [21]. We previously evaluated the rates of screw-related complications and screw malposition on computed tomography (CT) for children under age 10 [4], [8], [18], [19], [20]. This study seeks to further characterize freehand pedicle screw malposition in patients less than 18 years by posing the following questions: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often? Given the anatomical complexity of deformity diagnoses, we hypothesized a higher rate of pedicle screw malpositioning in these patients than in patients without deformity. Further, we postulated that malposition rates would be higher at the apical concavity compared with other levels.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

After obtaining institutional review board approval, the diagnostic and surgical database was searched to identify all posterior instrumented spinal fusions performed in patients younger than 18 years between 1992 and 2011. This data search was identical to that used by Baghdadi et al. [3], yielding 884 unique procedures. Pedicle screw instrumentation was performed in 339 cases involving 333 patients with a total of 2,458 screws placed. Pedicle screw instrumentation is FDA-approved for

Results

Including all medial and lateral breaches, screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned than screws in pediatric patients without coronal plane deformity (46% vs. 33%, p = .0014). A higher rate of moderate screw malposition (2–4 mm) was observed in pediatric patients with deformity compared with those without deformity (Table 3). For severe malposition (>4 mm), no difference was found between patients with coronal deformity and patients without coronal deformity

Discussion

Increased awareness of pedicle screw malposition has been brought about by intraoperative axial imaging technology [22]. Although some studies report a very low rate of pedicle screw malposition, most of these are based on analysis of radiographs rather than CT assessment of screw position [23]. Currently, early data suggest the short-term effects of malpositioned pedicle screws are minimal [12]. Nevertheless, there are potential late effects from malpositioned screws, such as erosion into the

References (25)

  • A. Manbachi et al.

    Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training

    Spine J

    (2014)
  • R. Hartl et al.

    Worldwide survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery

    World Neurosurg

    (2013)
  • E.C. Papadopoulos et al.

    Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery

    Spine J

    (2005)
  • T.L. Mueller et al.

    The safety of spinal pedicle screws in children ages 1 to 12

    Spine J

    (2013)
  • S. Rajasekaran et al.

    Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2007)
  • J.M. Hicks et al.

    Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2010)
  • Y.M. Baghdadi et al.

    Complications of pedicle screws in children 10 years or younger: a case control study

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2013)
  • A.N. Larson et al.

    The accuracy of navigation and 3D image-guided placement for the placement of pedicle screws in congenital spine deformity

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (2012)
  • D.W. Polly et al.

    Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2004)
  • S.I. Suk et al.

    Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1995)
  • C.G. Ledonio et al.

    Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2011)
  • T.R. Kuklo et al.

    Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2007)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Assessment of pedicle screw malposition in uniplanar versus multiplanar spinal deformities in children

      2021, North American Spine Society Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      While with the screw related complications, image guided approach did not show much advantage over free-hand technique [29]. Also, prior studies have reported that 5–17% pedicle screws are malpositioned, but these studies were not purely focused on children with younger age groups(12 years and less) [30]. Previous studies have shown that plain radiographs may not be reliable in determining pedicle screw breaches accurately in comparison to CT scan, especially the medial breaches [17,31–33].

    • Is the Measurement of Pedicle Axial Axes on Computed Tomography in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Also a Guide for Safer Screwing?

      2021, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, we found that malposition rates decrease significantly as a result of measuring the pedicle angle on preoperative CT. We believe this will be useful in preventing complications due to screw malpositions described in the literature.8,9,12,24 Sieradzki et al.25 measured the axial angles of the pedicles based on cervical CT in patients during the preoperative period.

    • Intraoperative Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation for Pediatric Spine Patients Reduced Return to Operating Room for Screw Malposition Compared With Freehand/Fluoroscopic Techniques

      2019, Spine Deformity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lehman et al. found that 10.5% screws placed using the freehand technique were malpositioned on CT imaging [14]. Baghdadi et al. found that 9% of screws placed in children with freehand technique had more than a 4-mm breach, and up to 20% may have a 2-mm breach, most commonly in the thoracic spine at T3-T8 [8,15]. Samdani et al. also found that 12% of freehand screws had a >2-mm breach, with no statistical correlation based on surgeon experience [16].

    • Quality, Safety, and Value in Pediatric Spine Surgery

      2018, Orthopedic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fluoroscopy can be used, and fluoroscopic times vary widely. The region at most risk for screw malposition is in the upper thoracic spine (T3–T8), where the pedicles are smallest,57,58 so if adjunct safety measures are to be used, the upper thoracic levels deserve the most attention. Robotic assistance can be used with a robotic arm directing a drill guide based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging.59

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Ethical Review Committee Statement: Institutional review board approval was obtained for all aspects of this study.

    No external funding was used to conduct this study.

    Author disclosures: MH (none); YMKB (none); ALM (none); WJS (none); MBD (none); AS (none); ANL (none).

    View full text