Case StudyAt What Levels Are Freehand Pedicle Screws More Frequently Malpositioned in Children?
Introduction
Pedicle screw fixation has become the preferred instrumentation for the surgical correction of pediatric spine deformity [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Improved fixation, reduced need for anterior surgery, and decreased revision rates are among the advantages of pedicle screws over other forms of posterior spinal instrumentation [2], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Previous clinical success of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar region has led to further use in the thoracic region, despite the anatomic challenges of placing pedicle screws in the thoracic vertebrae [7], [10]. Children with spinal deformity may have altered anatomy, potentially increasing the difficulty of accurate pedicle screw placement [3], [11]. Vascular or neurologic complications of thoracic pedicle screw malposition are rare, and most pedicle perforations are asymptomatic [1], [3], [6], [10]. Recent data suggest minimal long-term effects of malpositioned pedicle screws [12]. Nevertheless, given the potential complications of such breaches, it is in the interest of the patient to reduce the rate of screw malposition.
A variety of strategies and guidance systems are available to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw positioning [1], [2], [5], [13], [14], [15], [16]. However, barriers of cost, training, time efficiency, and radiation exposure may limit the widespread use of navigation and other guidance techniques [5], [14], [17]. Additionally, guidance may not be necessary for all pediatric surgeries or all spinal levels. Knowledge of what diagnoses and which vertebral levels are at highest risk of screw malposition may allow for the most effective use of such devices and may alert the surgeon when additional precautions may be necessary.
From 5% to 17% of all pedicle screws placed in children are thought to be positioned outside the bony confines of the pedicle [4], [8], [18], [19], [20]. There is limited information regarding the levels and direction at which screws are most frequently malpositioned. Some authors have concluded that pedicle screw malposition is more frequent at the apex of scoliotic curves [18], whereas others have noted more frequent malposition in the midthoracic spine [21]. We previously evaluated the rates of screw-related complications and screw malposition on computed tomography (CT) for children under age 10 [4], [8], [18], [19], [20]. This study seeks to further characterize freehand pedicle screw malposition in patients less than 18 years by posing the following questions: 1) Is the rate of freehand pedicle screw malpositioning higher in children with spinal deformity, particularly at the apical concavity? 2) At what vertebral levels do freehand pedicle screws have the highest rates of malpositioning? 3) In which direction (medial or lateral) do freehand pedicle wall violations occur most often? Given the anatomical complexity of deformity diagnoses, we hypothesized a higher rate of pedicle screw malpositioning in these patients than in patients without deformity. Further, we postulated that malposition rates would be higher at the apical concavity compared with other levels.
Section snippets
Patients and Methods
After obtaining institutional review board approval, the diagnostic and surgical database was searched to identify all posterior instrumented spinal fusions performed in patients younger than 18 years between 1992 and 2011. This data search was identical to that used by Baghdadi et al. [3], yielding 884 unique procedures. Pedicle screw instrumentation was performed in 339 cases involving 333 patients with a total of 2,458 screws placed. Pedicle screw instrumentation is FDA-approved for
Results
Including all medial and lateral breaches, screws in pediatric deformity patients were more frequently malpositioned than screws in pediatric patients without coronal plane deformity (46% vs. 33%, p = .0014). A higher rate of moderate screw malposition (2–4 mm) was observed in pediatric patients with deformity compared with those without deformity (Table 3). For severe malposition (>4 mm), no difference was found between patients with coronal deformity and patients without coronal deformity
Discussion
Increased awareness of pedicle screw malposition has been brought about by intraoperative axial imaging technology [22]. Although some studies report a very low rate of pedicle screw malposition, most of these are based on analysis of radiographs rather than CT assessment of screw position [23]. Currently, early data suggest the short-term effects of malpositioned pedicle screws are minimal [12]. Nevertheless, there are potential late effects from malpositioned screws, such as erosion into the
References (25)
- et al.
Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training
Spine J
(2014) - et al.
Worldwide survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery
World Neurosurg
(2013) - et al.
Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery
Spine J
(2005) - et al.
The safety of spinal pedicle screws in children ages 1 to 12
Spine J
(2013) - et al.
Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2007) - et al.
Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2010) - et al.
Complications of pedicle screws in children 10 years or younger: a case control study
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2013) - et al.
The accuracy of navigation and 3D image-guided placement for the placement of pedicle screws in congenital spine deformity
J Pediatr Orthop
(2012) - et al.
Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2004) - et al.
Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(1995)
Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Cited by (9)
Assessment of pedicle screw malposition in uniplanar versus multiplanar spinal deformities in children
2021, North American Spine Society JournalCitation Excerpt :While with the screw related complications, image guided approach did not show much advantage over free-hand technique [29]. Also, prior studies have reported that 5–17% pedicle screws are malpositioned, but these studies were not purely focused on children with younger age groups(12 years and less) [30]. Previous studies have shown that plain radiographs may not be reliable in determining pedicle screw breaches accurately in comparison to CT scan, especially the medial breaches [17,31–33].
Is the Measurement of Pedicle Axial Axes on Computed Tomography in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Also a Guide for Safer Screwing?
2021, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :However, we found that malposition rates decrease significantly as a result of measuring the pedicle angle on preoperative CT. We believe this will be useful in preventing complications due to screw malpositions described in the literature.8,9,12,24 Sieradzki et al.25 measured the axial angles of the pedicles based on cervical CT in patients during the preoperative period.
Intraoperative Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation for Pediatric Spine Patients Reduced Return to Operating Room for Screw Malposition Compared With Freehand/Fluoroscopic Techniques
2019, Spine DeformityCitation Excerpt :Lehman et al. found that 10.5% screws placed using the freehand technique were malpositioned on CT imaging [14]. Baghdadi et al. found that 9% of screws placed in children with freehand technique had more than a 4-mm breach, and up to 20% may have a 2-mm breach, most commonly in the thoracic spine at T3-T8 [8,15]. Samdani et al. also found that 12% of freehand screws had a >2-mm breach, with no statistical correlation based on surgeon experience [16].
Quality, Safety, and Value in Pediatric Spine Surgery
2018, Orthopedic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Fluoroscopy can be used, and fluoroscopic times vary widely. The region at most risk for screw malposition is in the upper thoracic spine (T3–T8), where the pedicles are smallest,57,58 so if adjunct safety measures are to be used, the upper thoracic levels deserve the most attention. Robotic assistance can be used with a robotic arm directing a drill guide based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging.59
Higher pedicle screw density does not improve curve correction in Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Ethical Review Committee Statement: Institutional review board approval was obtained for all aspects of this study.
No external funding was used to conduct this study.
Author disclosures: MH (none); YMKB (none); ALM (none); WJS (none); MBD (none); AS (none); ANL (none).