Patient EvaluationMulticenter Comparison of 3D Spinal Measurements Using Surface Topography With Those From Conventional Radiography
Introduction
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a structural spinal deformity in the coronal plane that affects 1%–3% of children in the United States [1]. When the deformity is minor, less than 20°, treatment for this condition typically includes observation and surveillance to assess for curve progression [2]. Bracing and surgery are the treatments indicated for larger curves, though management in these patients also includes radiographic surveillance for evidence of a change in the deformity. The gold standard for diagnosis and subsequent curve surveillance remains standing full-column radiographs of the spine [3].
Radiographic images allows for assessment of the magnitude of the deformity in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and quantifying the spinal curvatures by deriving Cobb angle measurements. The disadvantage of radiographs, however, particularly in young patients, is that repeated exposure to ionizing radiation causes a significant increase in the risk of malignancies later in life [4], [5]. The relative risk of breast cancer, for example, is nearly four times greater in these patients [6]. Nash et al. reported in 1979 that the average teenage girl with scoliosis received 22 radiographs over 3 years of surveillance for AIS [7]. The frequency of radiographs has undoubtedly gone down since then, but there are no current studies measuring how many radiographs the average patient receives. The radiation dose for standard x-rays has also improved significantly over the years [8], but nonradiographic methods to image the spine and predict spinal deformity are still needed. Although no patient can avoid radiographs completely, there should be an effort to reduce radiation exposure whenever possible.
Surface topography (ST) has been used as an alternative to plain radiographs, beginning with the use of the inclinometer to measure the rotational deformity associated with scoliosis [9]. Many systems using surface topography have since been developed [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], but there has not yet been a system that has gained widespread acceptance, as prior research on ST has shown it to be inconsistent as a method of measuring spinal deformity [18]. The goal of this study was to test a modern system of surface topography measurement and to determine whether it was reliable and reproducible across multiple users. The correlation between ST-estimated curvature measurements and radiographic Cobb angles were compared to determine the suitability of ST as a replacement for some radiographs during AIS surveillance.
Section snippets
Methods
Patients treated for juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS) or AIS from six North American institutions and one German institution were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of the coronal plane deformity (CD) patients were as follows: age between 8 and 18 years with JIS or AIS measuring ≥10° and <50°. A second cohort of patients whose primary deformity was kyphotic (KD) were studied. Inclusion criteria for this group were defined as a sagittal Cobb angle measuring ≥45°.
Results
One hundred ninety-three patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2014. There were 170 that met the criteria for the coronal plane group (scoliosis >10 degrees), 29 that met the criteria for the sagittal plane group (kyphosis >45 degrees), and 6 that were in both groups. The demographics of each group are listed below in Table 1.
The reliability and comparison to x-ray for each ST parameter are represented in Table 2. The reproducibility for each ST parameter for 3 repeated scans was strong
Discussion
This multicenter study was conducted to test surface topography in the evaluation of spinal deformity. A similar paper by the lead author was done at a single site with a single examiner and had results that were almost identical [27]. This study utilized six different centers and multiple examiners, demonstrating the reproducibility of the Formetric surface topography scanner across many venues. The average standard deviation of repeated measurements of less than three degrees across all
References (28)
- et al.
Risk factors for idiopathic scoliosis: review of a 6-year prospective study
Orthopedics
(2000) - et al.
The estimated cost of school scoliosis screening
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2000) - et al.
Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
J Pediatr Orthop
(1998) Carcinogenesis—a synopsis of human experience with external exposure in medicine
Health Phys
(1988)- et al.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2000) - et al.
Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders
Radiat Res
(2010) - et al.
Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1979) - et al.
Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years
Med Phys
(2008) - et al.
Hump changes on forward flexion of the lumbar spine in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. A study using ISIS and the Scoliometer in two standard positions
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(1988) - et al.
Measurement of body surface topography using an automated imaging system
Acta Orthop Belg
(1992)
A computer vision system for diagnosing scoliosis using moiré images
Comput Biol Med
Assessing the child with scoliosis: the role of surface topography
Arch Dis Child
The effect of posture on Quantec measurements
Stud Health Technol Inform
Evaluation of a laser scanner for surface topography
Stud Health Technol Inform
Cited by (72)
Monitoring of Curve Progression in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using 3-D Ultrasound
2024, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyAutomated non-contact measurement of the spine curvature at the sagittal plane using a deep neural network
2024, Clinical BiomechanicsConsistency of vertebral motion and individual characteristics in gait sequences
2023, Human Movement ScienceScoliosis assessment tools to reduce follow-up X-rays
2023, Journal of Orthopaedic TranslationCT analysis of the posterior anatomical landmarks of the scoliotic spine
2022, Clinical RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Simony et al. described a five-times higher overall cancer rate in a Danish AIS population, as compared to age-matched controls.3 Several radiation-free imaging methods are available to measure the severity of the scoliosis, such as surface topography and ultrasound imaging.4–14 In this, surface topography has been studied for decades, but the asymmetry of the torso is influenced by spine shape, as well as the ribcage, trunk rotation, muscle volume, body fat, and posture.
Comprehensive visualization of spinal motion in gait sequences based on surface topography
2022, Human Movement Science
Author disclosures: PK (grants from DIERS Medical Systems, outside the submitted work), PS (grants from DIERS Medical Systems, outside the submitted work), BL (reports grants from DIERS Medical Systems, personal fees from DePuy Synthes, personal fees from K2M, personal fees from Spine Search, personal fees from Paradigm Spine, grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, grants from AO Spine, grants from John and Marcella Fox Fund, grants from OREF, other from SRS Spine Deformity Journal, outside the submitted work), PC (reports grants from DIERS Medical Systems, personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, personal fees from Ellipse Technologies, personal fees from Globus Medical, personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work), MB (grants from DIERS Medical Systems, outside the submitted work), RM (grants from DIERS Medical Systems, outside the submitted work), MK (grants from DIERS Medical Systems, outside the submitted work), LL (grants from DePuy Synthes Spine, grants from DIERS Medical Systems, outside the submitted work; a patent 6,533,787 with royalties paid, a patent 6,830,571 with royalties paid, a patent 7,655,008 with royalties paid, a patent 7,670,358 with royalties paid, a patent 7,776,072 with royalties paid, a patent 8,727,972 with royalties paid, and a patent 8,361,121 with royalties paid; consultancy fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, K2M, Medtronic; travel reimbursement, “speakers bureaus,“ included in contracts; royalties from Medtronic, Quality Medical Publishing), RB (grants from DIERS Medical Systems, other from Advanced Vertebral Solutions, grants and personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, personal fees from Medtronic, other from Mimedx, other from Orthobond, personal fees and other from Abyrx, personal fees and other from SpineGuard, other from Medovex, personal fees from Zimmer, outside the submitted work).
This research project was approved by the IRB committee at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, and then subsequently approved by cooperative agreement at each of the participating medical centers.
- 1
Formerly at Shriners Hospital for Children, 3551 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
- 2
Formerly at Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Moorenstraße 5, Dusseldorf, 40225, Germany.
- 3
Formerly at Washington University Medical Center, 4901 Forest Park Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.