Oncology/endocrine
Prognostic Significance of VEGF Expression Evaluated by Quantitative Immunohistochemical Analysis in Colorectal Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.041Get rights and content

Background

The prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in colorectal cancer is still unclear, as shown by the discordant results still reported in the literature. The aim of the study was to examine the expression of VEGF in colorectal adenocarcinomas and investigate its prognostic relevance.

Materials and methods

VEGF expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry performed on tissue microarrays, in a series of 117 colorectal cancer specimens. The VEGF staining intensity in the cytoplasm of tumor cells was quantified using a semi-automated computerized image analysis and correlated with various clinicopathological characteristics and survival.

Results

All tumors evaluated showed expression of VEGF, which were further divided into 49 high expression and 68 low expression tumors by their staining intensity. In tumors with lymph node metastasis, the intensity of staining of VEGF was more intense than in those without (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the intensity of VEGF staining was more intense in Stage III tumors than those in Stage I/II (P < 0.0001). The mean number of involved lymph nodes in tumors with high VEGF staining intensity was significantly greater than in those with low staining intensity (P = 0.031). Survival analysis showed a significant correlation between high levels of VEGF staining intensity and poor disease-specific survival (P < 0.0001), with independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis (RR = 3.5, P < 0.0001). In addition, patients with Stage II disease and high staining intensity of VEGF had a significantly worse disease-specific survival than those with low staining intensity (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

VEGF expression in colorectal cancer seems to be an independent prognostic marker of tumor behavior and may be useful to identify patients with unfavorable clinical outcome.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality in the Western world both in men and women. It is the second most common malignancy (13.2%) and the second most common cause of cancer death in Europe [1]. Even among patients who undergo potentially curative resection alone, 40% to 50% of them ultimately relapse and die of metastatic disease [2].

Although TNM (tumor-nodes-metastasis) classification is useful for staging colorectal cancer patients and selecting them for specific treatment, it is not sufficient, as many patients at the same stage may have various outcomes, indicating that the conventional staging procedures may be unable to precisely predict cancer prognosis.

Therefore, there is a great need to identify molecular markers of more aggressive colorectal tumor phenotypes to appropriately select patients for adjuvant systemic or targeted therapies. In this regard, many studies have focused on molecular markers playing an important role in tumor angiogenesis.

Several positive regulators of tumor angiogenesis have been identified. Among these, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF or VEGF-A), also known as vascular permeability factor, is the most potent angiogenic factor stimulating endothelial cell proliferation, survival, and vascular maturation [3].

VEGF-A gene is located on chromosome 6p21.3 and undergoes alternative splicing yielding isoforms of 121, 165, 189, and 206 amino acids [4]. The role of VEGF expression as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer is controversial.

In the present study, the expression of VEGF protein in patients with colorectal cancer was investigated by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray (TMA) technology [5]. Computerized image analysis was carried out to quantify the intensity of VEGF immunostaining. The findings correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and survival status of the patients.

Section snippets

Patients

One hundred fifty patients who underwent elective potentially radical surgical resection of a histologically proven primary colorectal cancer at the General Hospital of Karditsa between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 2000 were identified from the hospital archives. None of the patients had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery.

Thirty-three patients were excluded from the analysis for the following reasons: 13 patients died within 4 wk after surgery; one patient was lost to

TMA Construction

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were used for tissue microarray construction. The paraffin blocks were used to prepare hematoxylin and eosin stained slides. The slides were reviewed by a senior pathologist (A.K.) to identify and mark out representative areas of viable tumor tissue. Taking tumor heterogeneity into account, triplicate tissue cores with a diameter of 1 mm were punched from selected tumor areas of each donor tissue block and brought into a recipient paraffin block

VEGF Expression

VEGF immunoreactivity was observed in the cytoplasm of tumor cells of all colorectal cancer tissues examined, with the majority (>85%) of tumor cells staining positively in all of the cases. Adjacent stromal cells (fibroblasts), wherever present, were noted to stain positively for VEGF. Despite this expression of VEGF by a similar proportion of cells in each case, the intensity of staining was noted to vary between the tumors (Fig. 1). The intensity of VEGF staining as graded by image analysis

Discussion

In addition to known conventional prognostic factors such as the depth of tumor invasion, the number of involved lymph nodes, and the involvement of resection margins, a plethora of molecular markers have been suggested as potential prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer, including tumor suppressor genes, cell adhesion molecules, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, mismatch repair genes, DNA-synthesis related genes, apoptosis

Acknowledgments

The authors thank P. Tzoumakari and G. Vilaras for their excellent technical assistance in the construction of tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry.

References (45)

  • J. Kononen et al.

    Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens

    Nat Med

    (1998)
  • R.L. Camp et al.

    X-tile: A new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2004)
  • D.G. Altman et al.

    Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1994)
  • J. Folkman

    What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis-dependent?

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1990)
  • S.I. Ishigami et al.

    Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in metastasis and prognosis of human colorectal cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (1998)
  • Y. Takahashi et al.

    Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlates with vascularity, metastasis, and proliferation of human colon cancer

    Cancer Res

    (1995)
  • T. Tokunaga et al.

    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA isoform expression pattern is correlated with liver metastasis and poor prognosis in colon cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (1998)
  • S.M. Kang et al.

    Combined analysis of p53 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in colorectal carcinoma for determination of tumor vascularity and liver metastasis

    Int J Cancer

    (1997)
  • J.H. Wong et al.

    Volume of lymphatic metastases does not independently influence prognosis in colorectal cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • L.H. Sobin et al.

    UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumors

    (2002)
  • D.R. Senger et al.

    Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid

    Science

    (1983)
  • J.L. Gross et al.

    Plasminogen activator and collagenase production by cultured capillary endothelial cells

    J Cell Biol

    (1982)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text