GastrointestinalEvaluation of techniques to prevent colorectal anastomotic leakage
Introduction
The double-stapling technique (DST) is the most frequently performed method for colorectal anastomosis and is the only intracorporeal method possible for lower rectal anastomosis. However, the risk of anastomosis leakage (AL) after DST remains high, and the technical risk factors have not been well established [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
In a preliminary endoscopic evaluation of anastomosis lesions after DST, we noted three characteristics of AL [1]. First, all ALs occurred on the circular anastomosis line. Second, half the ALs occurred on the overlapping stapler points, and the other half occurred between the overlapping points. Third, neither necrotic changes nor ischemic injury occurred in other locations, including the residual rectal stump. Furthermore, investigation of the technical factors related to the development of AL after DST anastomosis revealed that the anastomosis method itself may be closely associated with the development of AL. However, our endoscopic evaluation of DST assessed relatively few patients, and analyzing larger patient populations within a short period is difficult. Therefore, we chose to evaluate the technical factors of colorectal anastomosis in this animal study.
Some animal experiments on colorectal anastomosis strength have been reported. However, all preliminary experiments used the colon or small intestines [2], [5]. The present study was performed using porcine rectum, which lacks serosa and has thick muscle layers. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the technical factors of colorectal anastomosis with stapling and to identify the most reliable method. Hand-sewn reinforcement was also examined to determine whether it was effective in increasing the anastomotic strength.
Section snippets
Animal care
Fifteen healthy female Japanese domestic pigs, 3–4 mo-old and weighing 30–42 kg, were used in this study, which was conducted in full accordance with the principles and authorization of the local Helsinki Institutional Review Board for animal studies (approval code A23-189-0, obtained from the corresponding ethical committee of Kyushu University).
Operative technique
Through a midline laparotomy, the distal rectum was transected at as low a level as possible and the proximal rectum divided at the transition between
Burst pressure
The first burst pressures were as follows: SSDP, 11.2 ± 3.9 mm Hg; DST, 13.0 ± 4.2; SS-L, 33.8 ± 2.6; SS-C, 49.8 ± 22.7; and SS-C + HR, 89.0 ± 14.3 mm Hg (n = 6). Pressures were significantly higher in the SS-L and SS-C than in the SSDP and DST groups (P < 0.001; Fig. 1A) and were higher in the SS + HR than in the SS-C and SS-L groups (P < 0.001; Fig. 1B).
Disruptions
The first disruptions in the SSDP, DST, SS-C, and SS-C + HR groups occurred on the circular anastomosis line. In the DST group, the first
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of anastomosis methodology to report histologic findings of the anastomotic regions containing staples.
We chose to perform our experiments extracorporeally for two reasons. First, in the preliminary clinical results of an endoscopic evaluation of colorectal ALs after DST, all ALs occurred on the circular anastomosis line, and neither necrotic changes nor ischemic injury occurred in other locations, including the residual rectal stump [1].
Conclusions
Side-to-side anastomosis with CS is technically faultless because the staple lines do not overlap and a purse-string is not needed. However, the CS has a structure in which all the staples are tightened by only one gripping force and, when it is completed, the staple line is staggered in two rows. By performing hand-sewn suturing of the entire circumference, the anastomosis line can itself be reinforced and an ideal, strong anastomosis can be provided.
Acknowledgment
No financial support was received for this work from any company. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Scientific Research Fund of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.
Authors' contributions: T.I. and M.M. contributed to the study conception and design. data analysis and interpretation. T.I., R.K., E.O., K.T., K.A., S.A., T.A., and M.M. did the data collection. T.I. did the writing and critical revision of the article. T.I., R.L., E.O.,
References (12)
- et al.
Endoscopic evaluation of clinical colorectal anastomotic leakage
J Surg Res
(2015) - et al.
Single-stapled double-pursestring anastomosis after anterior resection of the rectum
Am J Surg
(2007) - et al.
The effect of sealing with a fixed combination of collagen matrix-bound coagulation factors on the healing of colonic anastomoses in experimental high-risk mice models
Langenbecks Arch Surg
(2010) - et al.
Morbidity and mortality after single- and double-stapled colorectal anastomoses in patients with carcinoma of the rectum
Aust N Z J Surg
(1996) - et al.
Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study
Int J Colorectal Dis
(2013) - et al.
“Dog ear” formation after double-stapled low anterior resection as a risk factor for anastomotic disruption
Dis Colon Rectum
(2000)
Cited by (25)
A trinity technique for prevention of low rectal anastomotic leakage in the robotic era
2020, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :In this study, we routinely protected the left colic artery, which facilitated improvement of the blood supply of anastomosis [12,13]. ( 2) A previous study indicated that the “dog-ear” area created after use of a double stapling technique was a high-spot site for potential defect of anastomosis, and lead to AL occurring [14,15], especially for patients with positive anastomotic leak tests [31]. However, traditional laparoscopic surgery is difficult and time cost to reinforce the low anastomosis due to rigid instruments and narrow operation space in pelvic.
Achieving low anastomotic leak rates utilizing clinical perfusion assessment
2016, Surgery (United States)Citation Excerpt :And finally, utilizing such a system does take a bit of time in the operating room.5,12 In particular, laparoscopic low anterior resections already are known to be associated with fairly long operative times.8,26 The Perfusion Assessment in Laparoscopic Left-Sided/Anterior Resection (PILLAR II) trial incorporating fluorescence angiography reported mean operative times of 4 hours.1
The effects of stem cells and platelet-rich fibrin on colonic anastomosis: An experimental study
2023, Annali Italiani di ChirurgiaA comparison of the pressure failure of two colorectal anastamoses stapling techniques
2023, Proceedings of the 2023 Design of Medical Devices Conference, DMD 2023