Original Article
Prior Antiplatelet Therapy, Platelet Infusion Therapy, and Outcome after Intracerebral Hemorrhage

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.10.007Get rights and content

Background

Recent studies examining the effect of prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) on outcome in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have shown conflicting results. The effect of platelet infusion therapy (PIT) on outcome in patients with ICH taking APT is unknown.

Methods

We reviewed records of patients with ICH admitted to a single hospital, excluding those with international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 1.5. Baseline characteristics were compared by APT status in all patients and by PIT status in the subgroup of patients on APT. We used multivariate analyses to generate propensity and prognostic scores for exposures (APT and PIT) and outcomes (favorable outcome and hospital death), respectively. We examined the associations between exposures and outcomes and adjusted these for propensity and/or prognostic scores. We then validated our findings with a sensitivity analysis.

Results

Of 368 patients identified, 121 (31.3%) were taking APT, mostly aspirin. Patients on APT were older and more likely to have vascular comorbidities than those not. The APT group also had a higher initial Glasgow Coma Scale score at presentation. In analyses adjusted for both propensity and prognostic scores, APT was associated with a higher likelihood of hospital death (odds ratio [OR] 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.6); PIT did not prevent hospital death (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.3-5.5) or increase favorable outcome (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.4-5.4).

Conclusions

In patients with ICH, APT is associated with an increased risk of hospital death. In the subgroup of patients on APT, PIT did not prevent death or improve outcome.

Section snippets

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study based on review of medical records. We included 368 consecutive patients with nontraumatic spontaneous ICH and an international normalized ratio less than 1.5 between May 2001 and September 2003, who were admitted to a Joint Commission primary stroke center that serves as a tertiary referral center for patients with severe neurologic diseases. Patients with a secondary cause for their hemorrhage, such as ruptured aneurysm, primary ischemic

Results

We identified 368 eligible patients with ICH of whom 121 (31.3%) were on APT. All but 3, who were taking clopidogrel alone, were on aspirin (118 of 121), either alone (105 of 121) or in combination with clopidogrel (11 of 121) or extended-release dipyridamole (2 of 121). Of the 121 patients on APT, 53 received PIT.

The results of the bivariate analyses for APT and PIT are summarized in Table 2. Compared with patients not on APT, those on APT were significantly older and had more comorbid

Discussion

Having excluded patients with an international normalized ratio of 1.5 or more, whether on anticoagulants or not, we found that almost a third of patients (31.3%) in this study were on APT with all but 3 on aspirin, either alone or in combination with other antiplatelet agents. The results suggest that patients with ICH are more likely to die in hospital if they are taking APT before the event. The increased risk of death was evident only after adjusting for factors related to: (1) use of APT;

Conclusions

This study adds to the evidence that patients with ICH on APT are more likely to die than those not on APT. Whether PIT could improve outcomes in patients with ICH on APT is not answered by this study, but to our knowledge, this is the only study that has addressed the effect of PIT on outcome in patients with ICH. A randomized trial in which platelets are given by a standard protocol and within a specific time interval from ICH symptom onset will ultimately be required to determine whether PIT

References (17)

  • C. Foerch et al.

    Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents is not independently associated with unfavorable outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage

    Stroke

    (2006)
  • K.S. Wong

    Risk factors for early death in acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage: A prospective hospital-based study in Asia; Asian acute stroke advisory panel

    Stroke

    (1999)
  • O.G. Nilsson et al.

    Prediction of death in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: A prospective study of a defined population

    J Neurosurg

    (2002)
  • J. Rosand et al.

    The effect of warfarin and intensity of anticoagulation on outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage

    Arch Intern Med

    (2004)
  • J. Roquer et al.

    Previous antiplatelet therapy is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality after spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage

    J Neurol

    (2005)
  • K. Toyoda et al.

    Antiplatelet therapy contributes to acute deterioration of intracerebral hemorrhage

    Neurology

    (2005)
  • P. Saloheimo et al.

    Regular aspirin-use preceding the onset of primary intracerebral hemorrhage is an independent predictor for death

    Stroke

    (2006)
  • K. Lacut et al.

    Antiplatelet drug use preceding the onset of intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with increased mortality

    Fundam Clin Pharmacol

    (2007)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (83)

  • The effect of platelet transfusion on functional independence and mortality after antiplatelet therapy associated spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Only one study considered antiplatelet sensitivity as an indication for transfusion [19]. Two studies included outcomes at 90 days [12,14], while the others only included outcomes at hospital discharge [10,11,19]. Functional outcomes were defined by modified Rankin Scale of ≤ three in three studies [10,14,19], and simplified to death / dependently alive / or independently alive in the fifth [12].

  • The Role of Platelet Transfusions After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients on Antiplatelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    2020, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Even if statistically significant, a difference of 0.06 points cannot be considered of clinical relevance. Seven studies reported severe neurologic disability defined as modified Rankin Scale score at discharge,12,26,28 modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months,25,34 Glasgow Outcome Scale at hospital discharge,35 and Activities of Daily Living Scale at 6 months.32 There was no significant difference between the 2 groups; RD was –0.10 (10%; 95% CI, –0.26 to 0.07; P = 0.27; Figure 3).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Equal contribution.

View full text