Utility of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Surgical Management of Infective Endocarditis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.047Get rights and content

Background

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently obtained in patients with infective endocarditis, yet its utility in predicting outcomes for valve replacement surgery in patients is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine how brain MRI findings impact clinical management and outcomes.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data from electronic medical records at Mayo Clinic were retrospectively reviewed for patients hospitalized with definite or possible infective endocarditis according to the modified Duke criteria between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014. There were 364 patients included in the study.

Results

Cardiac valve replacement surgery was performed in 195 of 364 (53.6%) patients, and 95 (48.7%) of the surgical patients underwent preoperative MRI, which was associated with preoperative neurologic symptoms in 56 of 95 (58.9%) patients (odds ratio = 12.92; 95% confidence interval, 5.98-27.93; P <.001). Postoperative neurologic complications occurred in 24 of 195 (12.3%) patients, including new ischemic stroke in 4 of 195 (2.1%) and new intracerebral hemorrhage in 3 of 195 (1.5%). No patients with microhemorrhages developed postoperative hemorrhage. No significant differences existed in rates of postoperative complications between patients with and those without preoperative MRI. There were no substantial associations between preoperative MRI findings and postoperative neurologic complications, functional outcomes as described by the modified Rankin Scale score, or 6-month mortality.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing valve replacement surgery, preoperative MRI findings were not associated with differences in postoperative outcomes, irrespective of finding or timing of valve replacement surgery.

Introduction

Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with in-hospital mortality rates as high as 26%.1 Neurologic complications of IE include stroke, mycotic aneurysm, brain abscess, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and meningitis. Once found, a stroke may delay the timing of cardiac valve replacement surgery, potentially leading to a worse prognosis.2, 3 Guidelines by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons advise to wait at least 4 weeks following an embolic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke to replace an infected valve, owing to the presumed increased risk of perioperative ICH in the setting of procedural anticoagulation and cardiopulmonary bypass.4, 5, 6

The optimal timing of valve repair in IE is one of the most complex decisions in cardiovascular surgery, and neurologists are often involved. Moreover, brain imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as it is commonly known to be more sensitive than computed tomography in detecting embolic phenomena, is frequently obtained in patients with IE to detect or predict complications, yet its ability to impact decisions that may alter clinical outcomes is unknown. The existing literature assessing the utility of brain MRI in endocarditis consists primarily of descriptive neuroimaging studies of small cohorts. These studies have not assessed the value of brain MRI in guiding clinical decisions and have not examined whether obtaining a preoperative MRI is associated with better postoperative outcomes.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 In this study, we evaluated the impact of brain MRI findings on the clinical management and functional outcomes in patients with right- or left-sided IE. We hypothesized that there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients who received MRI preoperatively and those who did not, thus questioning the value of obtaining an MRI and the consequent effects imaging findings may have on valve replacement.

Section snippets

Patient Population and Study Design

The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this study. We identified 2123 patients with suspected or confirmed IE who received care at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014. Patients excluded were those without definite or possible IE, lack of a neurologic assessment, lost to follow-up, or with incomplete data. This resulted in 364 patients with IE who were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received

Results

Cardiac valve replacement surgery was performed in 195 of 364 (53.6%) patients, including 95 of 195 (48.7%) patients who had preoperative MRI (Fig 1). Patient characteristics and subgroup analyses between preoperative MRI and no preoperative MRI groups are displayed in Table 1. Patients who received preoperative MRI were less likely to have congestive heart failure (OR = .47; 95% CI, .24-0.94; P = .03) and more likely to have preoperative neurologic symptoms (OR = 12.92; 95% CI, 5.98-27.93; P <

Discussion

Neurologic complications of IE have been well described as sequelae of cardioembolic events with resultant arterial thrombus, hemorrhage, and arterial or meningeal infection.23, 24 Such events are commonly associated with worse prognosis. Previous studies have not addressed the impact of imaging findings on functional outcomes. The key finding of our study is that preoperative MRI findings were not linked to clinical outcomes. This emphasizes the debate of whether to obtain brain MRI in

Conclusions

In hospitalized patients with IE, preoperative brain MRI findings did not affect outcomes of valve replacement surgery. In particular, microhemorrhages on preoperative MRI were not associated with the development of postoperative ICH. Although the clinical utility of brain MRI in patients with IE deserves further investigation, our results suggest that brain MRI findings—particularly in those obtained in the absence of neurologic symptoms—may not be useful in defining the optimal timing for

References (35)

  • X. Duval et al.

    Effect of early cerebral magnetic resonance imaging on clinical decisions in infective endocarditis: a prospective study

    Ann Intern Med

    (2010)
  • J. Champey et al.

    Value of brain MRI in infective endocarditis: a narrative literature review

    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (2015)
  • A.B. Singhal et al.

    Acute ischemic stroke patterns in infective and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study

    Stroke

    (2002)
  • A. Hess et al.

    Brain MRI findings in neurologically asymptomatic patients with infective endocarditis

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2013)
  • I. Klein et al.

    Cerebral microbleeds are frequent in infective endocarditis: a case-control study

    Stroke

    (2009)
  • T. Goulenok et al.

    Infective endocarditis with symptomatic cerebral complications: contribution of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging

    Cerebrovasc Dis

    (2013)
  • B. Iung et al.

    Determinants of cerebral lesions in endocarditis on systematic cerebral magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study

    Stroke

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    Author contributions: Tia Chakraborty, MD, authored, conceptualized, analyzed and acquired data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. She had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Eugene Scharf, MD, authored, conceptualized, acquired data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. Alejandro A. Rabinstein, MD, authored, conceptualized, drafted, and revised the manuscript. Daniel DeSimone, MD, authored, designed, conceptualized, acquired data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. Abdelghani El Rafei, MD, acquired data and revised the manuscript. Waleed Brinjikji, MD, authored and revised the manuscript. Larry M. Baddour, MD authored, conceptualized, drafted, and revised the manuscript. Eelco Wijdicks, MD, PhD, authored, conceptualized, drafted, and revised the manuscript. Walter Wilson, MD, authored and revised the manuscript. James M. Steckelberg, MD, authored and revised the manuscript. Jennifer E. Fugate, DO, authored, designed, conceptualized, drafted, and revised the manuscript.

    All authors report no disclosures.

    View full text