Elsevier

Journal of Surgical Education

Volume 73, Issue 6, November–December 2016, Pages e118-e130
Journal of Surgical Education

2016 APDS SPRING MEETING
The Feasibility of Real-Time Intraoperative Performance Assessment With SIMPL (System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning): Early Experience From a Multi-institutional Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.010Get rights and content

Purpose

Intraoperative performance assessment of residents is of growing interest to trainees, faculty, and accreditors. Current approaches to collect such assessments are limited by low participation rates and long delays between procedure and evaluation. We deployed an innovative, smartphone-based tool, SIMPL (System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning), to make real-time intraoperative performance assessment feasible for every case in which surgical trainees participate, and hypothesized that SIMPL could be feasibly integrated into surgical training programs.

Methods

Between September 1, 2015 and February 29, 2016, 15 U.S. general surgery residency programs were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved trial. SIMPL was made available after 70% of faculty and residents completed a 1-hour training session. Descriptive and univariate statistics analyzed multiple dimensions of feasibility, including training rates, volume of assessments, response rates/times, and dictation rates. The 20 most active residents and attendings were evaluated in greater detail.

Results

A total of 90% of eligible users (1267/1412) completed training. Further, 13/15 programs began using SIMPL. Totally, 6024 assessments were completed by 254 categorical general surgery residents (n = 3555 assessments) and 259 attendings (n = 2469 assessments), and 3762 unique operations were assessed. There was significant heterogeneity in participation within and between programs. Mean percentage (range) of users who completed ≥1, 5, and 20 assessments were 62% (21%-96%), 34% (5%-75%), and 10% (0%-32%) across all programs, and 96%, 75%, and 32% in the most active program. Overall, response rate was 70%, dictation rate was 24%, and mean response time was 12 hours. Assessments increased from 357 (September 2015) to 1146 (February 2016). The 20 most active residents each received mean 46 assessments by 10 attendings for 20 different procedures.

Conclusions

SIMPL can be feasibly integrated into surgical training programs to enhance the frequency and timeliness of intraoperative performance assessment. We believe SIMPL could help facilitate a national competency-based surgical training system, although local and systemic challenges still need to be addressed.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in competency-based performance assessment in surgical education.1, 2 This trend occurs at a time of growing concern among surgeons and surgical educators that residents may no longer be reaching the levels of confidence and competence expected of them by the end of training.3, 4, 5 There are many challenges to the goal of training safe and independent surgeons, including the erosion of intraoperative trainee autonomy, duty-hours restrictions, patient safety and malpractice concerns, and pressures to increase productivity in an increasingly complex health care environment.6 Recent national debate surrounding the risks of concurrent surgery has highlighted yet another related factor, challenging our ability to promote trainee autonomy in the surgical workplace.7, 8, 9 To address this, surgical residency programs are looking to create the systems and to induce the culture changes needed to provide trainees with specific, timely, and consistent performance feedback that would enhance their progression toward operative competence and independence.

In this context, operative performance assessment and feedback is an area that would particularly benefit from new methodologies. Many assessment methods are limited in their ability to ensure that trainees receive personalized feedback in a consistent and timely manner, even while residents are increasingly being asked to provide operative performance assessments as a prerequisite for graduation. Furthermore, little objective data exist to guide competency-based decisions related to resident progression toward independent practice. Emerging technologies offer the potential to address these issues by making it possible to collect “real-time” assessments for resident operative performances.10, 11 If widely adopted, benefits might accrue not just at the individual and program levels, but also at the national level by providing an evidence base to set benchmarks for resident progression.

Over the past 4 years, our group has studied methods for collecting more frequent operative performance assessments, culminating in the development of an innovative mobile technology called SIMPL (System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning). This software platform enables the collection of intraoperative feedback and performance assessments for every surgical procedure in which residents participate. Residents, faculty, programs, and accreditors can use these data to better understand the progression of intraoperative resident autonomy and performance. In this article, we describe initial feasibility data from the first 6 months of a multi-institutional trial using SIMPL. We hypothesized that SIMPL could be feasibly used by surgical training programs to increase the frequency of operative performance assessments.

Section snippets

Overview

With support from the American Board of Surgery, 15 general surgery residency programs were enrolled in a multi-institutional trial to prospectively collect intraoperative performance assessments using SIMPL. Each site licensed SIMPL for the duration of the study. The feasibility of SIMPL adoption was measured through a series of metrics related to user training completion rates and day-to-day participation. The multi-institutional trial was approved by our institutional review board (IRB) to

SIMPL Background

SIMPL is a smartphone-based application designed to facilitate assessment and feedback of operative performance and to enhance intraoperative teaching with surgical trainees. SIMPL provides a 3-question performance assessment for both trainees (self-assessment) and attendings (trainee assessment) following any procedure that they perform together. Attendings additionally can provide specific dictated feedback with every assessment. Data created via SIMPL are available in real time to residents,

ABS Trial Enrollment

Overall 15 General Surgery residency training programs across the United States were enrolled in this multi-institutional study, including Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Indiana University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Northwestern University, SUNY Upstate, University of Kentucky, University of Minnesota, University of Nebraska, University of New Mexico, University of Texas Southwestern, University of Virginia, University of Washington, University of Wisconsin, Vanderbilt, and Washington

Discussion

We demonstrate here that, based on a broad range of outcome measures, SIMPL can be feasibly used to facilitate intraoperative performance feedback and to collect “real-time” operative performance assessments for general surgery residents. SIMPL users have so far generated more than 6000 operative performance assessments with categorical general surgery residents in 13 different general surgery programs. Analyses of our top 20 resident and attending users suggest that SIMPL can be feasibly used

Conclusions

SIMPL is a scalable system that makes it feasible for general surgery trainees and surgical residency programs to rapidly increase the frequency and timeliness of intraoperative performance assessments. Participation within the first 13 sites of the SIMPL trial is increasing. However, to fully maximize engagement, certain cultural barriers and habits of practice must be addressed. By doing so, tools such as SIMPL can provide a feasible means by which surgical education can continue to be

Role of Funding Sources

The members of PLSC and the site PIs at each participating institution contributed to the SIMPL rollout and participated in writing/editing this article. We declare no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The American Board of Surgery did not participate in data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of this report, or the decision

Disclosure

This study was supported by the American Board of Surgery and 15 institutions participating in a multi-institutional trial. Totally, 12 of the coauthors (J.D.B., B.C.G., R.G.W., M.C.S., L.T., J.T.M., S.L.M., N.J.S., J.B.Z., K.D.L., G.L.D., and J.P.F.) are members of the Steering Committee of PLSC, a nonprofit surgical education research consortium that developed SIMPL (described in this study) to improve surgical education and assessment. Each of the participating institutions in the

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the American Board of Surgery for its generous support of the multi-institutional trial via the following grant: “Multicenter Study of Operative Autonomy in General Surgery Residents using SIMPL, the Modified Procedural Autonomy and Supervision System (PASS).” We also acknowledge the support provided by the departments of surgery from the 3 co-founding institutions of PLSC, namely Massachusetts General Hospital, Indiana University, and Northwestern University, and through

References (26)

  • R.G. Williams et al.

    A template for reliable assessment of resident operative performance: assessment intervals, numbers of cases and raters

    Surgery

    (2012)
  • T. Wilson et al.

    What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experience from seven countries

    Jt Comm J Qual Saf

    (2003)
  • T.J. Nasca et al.

    The next GME accreditation system rationale and benefits

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • Cited by (143)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Co-First Authors.

    View full text