Acquired cardiovascular disease
Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.008Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

Transapical aortic valve implantation significantly reduces operative risk in elderly patients with aortic valve stenosis and comorbidities. However, it is unknown whether this procedure is feasible in patients with advanced heart failure.

Methods

Between April 2008 and July 2010, 258 patients underwent transapical aortic valve implantation. Twenty-one patients had advanced heart failure with decompensation and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 10% to 25%. The mean age of these patients was 74 ± 11 years (range, 36-88 years). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 20% ± 5% (range, 10%-25%). Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 66% ± 21% (range, 27%-97%) and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 33% ± 25% (range, 4%-90%). Nine patients were operated on using femorofemoral cardiopulmonary bypass and 12 without.

Results

Technical success of the procedure was 100% with no conversion to conventional surgery. The mean time of cardiopulmonary bypass was 27 ± 25 minutes (range, 6-81 minutes). Postoperatively, the left ventricular ejection fraction increased to 38% ± 12% (range, 20%-60%). There were no postoperative neurologic complications. A new pacemaker implantation was needed in 2 (10%) patients. The 30-day mortality was 4.8%. Survival at 1, 3, 12, and 24 months was 95%, 81%, 76%, and 62%, respectively.

Conclusions

Transapical aortic valve implantation can be performed safely in patients with decompensated heart failure or even in the presence of cardiogenic shock.

CTSNet classification

22
28
35.2
35.3.3

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CPB
cardiopulmonary bypass
LVEF
left ventricular ejection fraction

Cited by (0)

Disclosure: Professor Pasic and Drs Unbehaun, Drews, Buz, and Dreysse have been proctors to Edwards Lifesciences since July 2009. The other authors report no conflicts of interest with regard to commercial support.