Clinical research study
Popliteal vein aneurysm
Treatment of popliteal vein aneurysms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.12.013Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objective

Popliteal vein aneurysms are associated with high risk for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism. The goal of this study was to report treatment strategies for popliteal vein aneurysms and their outcome after long-term follow-up.

Methods

All patients between June 1993 and June 2018 with diagnosed popliteal vein aneurysm were enrolled in this study and analyzed retrospectively. They received regular surveillance alone or treatment. Patients were offered aneurysm resection or lifelong anticoagulation if they had aneurysm size of twice normal vein diameter. All patients received clinical examination and duplex ultrasound examination 3 to 6 months after operation or primary diagnosis and annually thereafter.

Results

A total of 39 patients (aneurysm size, mean 23.3 mm) were treated by either operation or anticoagulation (31/39 [79%]) or surveillance alone (8/39 [21%]). Patients with an aneurysm >20 mm in diameter had a significantly higher incidence of turbulent flow on duplex ultrasound examination with higher risk for development of DVT (P = .029). Of the 31 patients with a therapeutic approach, 29 (94%) preferred resection, whereas 2 (6%) patients were treated with lifelong anticoagulation and compression. Mean follow-up was 57.9 ± 12.5 months.

Conclusions

According to these results, it seems that patients with large popliteal vein aneurysms experience DVT more frequently. Therefore, popliteal vein aneurysms >20 mm should be considered for surgical treatment or lifelong anticoagulation, depending on the patient's preference.

Keywords

Popliteal vein aneurysm
Deep venous thrombosis
Therapeutic anticoagulation
Aneurysm resection

Cited by (0)

Clinical trial registration: Z-2018-1097-2.

Author conflict of interest: none.

The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the Journal policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest.