Elsevier

The Knee

Volume 12, Issue 6, December 2005, Pages 410-413
The Knee

High tibial osteotomy: Long term survival analysis and patients' perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2005.03.006Get rights and content

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy has been generally accepted as a useful treatment for unicompartment osteoarthritis of the knee to improve a patient's quality of life. Few studies have examined the outcome from the patient's perspective. A survival analysis of one to twenty-one years was conducted on 67 knees including analysis of the patients' satisfaction level with this procedure. Cumulative survival probability of 89.5% at 5 years, 74.7% at 10 years and 66.9 % for 15 and 20 years was reported. Ninety-one percent of patients had improvement in pain score and would choose to have this surgery again. Average patient satisfaction level was 75.5%. Forty-eight percent of patients were able to perform at a higher level of activity than before surgery, although none was able to perform at the level prior to the onset of knee pathology. It was concluded that this procedure was able to improve a patient's quality of life and achieved high satisfaction among patients. There is an increasing role of high tibial osteotomy as an adjunct to an autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure.

Introduction

High tibial osteotomy has been used for treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee for a long time with success. However, it has also been shown that the results deteriorate with time. Most studies demonstrate a satisfactory result in approximately 80% of patients at 5 years and 60% at 10 years after a valgus high tibial osteotomy [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. A more recent study demonstrated a survival rate of 39% at 15 years and 30% at 20 years [12].

Because of this and the constantly growing long term survival rate of total knee arthroplasty, enthusiasm for this procedure has declined over the past decade. However, with the current growing interest in autologous chondrocyte implantation technology, it is expected that the role of high tibial osteotomy will increase again, as correction of axial alignment will influence the outcome and survival of the biological resurfacement. [13], [14].

Nowadays high tibial osteotomy is mainly reserved for patients less than 60 years old. Proponents of this procedure claim that it offers this younger group of patients an opportunity to have a higher level of function or to lead a more active lifestyle for a variable period of time than they would have if a total knee arthroplasty was carried out. It is not uncommon to have a discrepancy between the patients' and surgeons' perception on the success of the surgery. The surgeon may be happy with the procedure but the patient may be dissatisfied. Various factors may influence the patients' level of satisfaction. These include physical, psychological and socioeconomic factors. Patient satisfaction is the main priority in this procedure as the main aim is to improve the quality of life. This study aims to look at this procedure from the perspective of the patient and to examine whether patients who undergo high tibial osteotomy truly achieve a desirable level of active lifestyle.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

From 1982 to 2003, 67 high tibial osteotomies were carried out on 62 patients (five females and 57 males), five patients had bilateral knee surgery. There were 41 right knees and 26 left knees. The average age of the patients was 49 years (range 22 to 74). The mean follow up time was 6.5 years (range 1 to 21 years). All patients had osteoarthritis limited to the medial compartment of the knee.

The senior author performed all the surgeries. Desired correction was calculated preoperatively on a

Results

Using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis [16], the probability of survival for high tibial osteotomy was 89.5% at five years, 74.7 at 10 years and 66.9 % at 15 and 20 years. Six patients had a total knee replacement at an average of 9.5 years (range 2 to 21 years). Six patients had no improvement in pain level after surgery.

The average time to union was 2.9 months (range 2 to 9 months). There were five cases of delayed union (7.5%) in which the delay was arbitrarily defined as absence of

Discussion

The advantage of using a survival analysis is that it allows inclusion of patients with different duration of follow up, therefore increasing the strength of the study by having a bigger sample size. Coventry et al [1] reported a survival of 87% at five years and 66% at 10 years using total knee arthroplasty as the end point. Naudie et al [12] reported 73% survival at 5 years, 51% at 10 years, 39% at 15 years and 30% at 20 years using an end point of the need for conversion to total knee

References (18)

  • M.A. Ritter et al.

    Proximal tibial osteotomy: a survival analysis

    J Arthroplasty

    (1988)
  • K.J. Rothman

    Estimation of confidence limits for the cumulative probability of survival in life table analysis

    J Chronic Dis

    (1978)
  • M.B. Coventry et al.

    Proximal tibial osteotomy: a critical long term study of eighty seven cases

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1993)
  • P. Aglietti et al.

    Tibial osteotomy for the varus osteoarthritic knee

    Clin Orthop

    (1983)
  • J.N. Insall et al.

    High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1984)
  • A.T. Berman et al.

    Factors influencing long term results in high tibial osteotomy

    Clin Orthop

    (1987)
  • I. Ivarsson et al.

    High tibial osteotomy for medial osteoarthritis of the knee: a 5 to seven and an eleven to thirteen year follow up

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1990)
  • L.S. Matthews et al.

    Proximal tibial osteotomy: factors that influence the duration of satisfactory function

    Clin Orthop

    (1998)
  • E. Rinonapoli et al.

    Tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. a 10 to 21 year follow up study

    Clin Orthop

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (75)

  • Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Planning and improving outcomes: Case series and literature review

    2023, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
    Citation Excerpt :

    Patients with normal limb alignment as indicated by a femorotibial angle of 174° and symptomatic OA of the medial compartment can be considered candidates for HTO.44 Contraindications for HTO include flexion contractures greater than 15°, markedly decreased knee range of motion (ROM), inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis, obvious joint instability, BMI >35, symptomatic patellofemoral OA or radiologic patellofemoral OA of grade 3 or 4, and OA of the lateral compartment of the knee.3,14,39,40,42,44 Some studies disagreed, and did not consider slight degenerative OA changes in the lateral compartment of the knee to be a contraindication for HTO.44

  • Pressure algometry is an excellent tool to measure knee pain relief after a closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy

    2018, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Valgus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) has been demonstrated to be successful in treating patients with symptomatic medial tibio-femoral knee osteoarthritis [1–6].

  • A preliminary modeling investigation into the safe correction zone for high tibial osteotomy

    2018, Knee
    Citation Excerpt :

    Biomechanically, this lateral shift decreases medial compartment stresses [11,12]. Historically, surgeons aimed to re-align the knee to between three degrees and six degrees valgus [5,13-18]. Re-alignment has also been described according to where the WBA crosses the tibial plateau: as a percentage of tibial width, measured from the medial side.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text