Elsevier

The Knee

Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 48-52
The Knee

Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of preoperative patellofemoral osteoarthritis, BMI and age for implant survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed in patients meeting strict admission criteria. The data and radiographs of 437 unilateral Oxford phase III procedures (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) were analysed. All procedures were carried out or supervised by 13 specialised knee surgeons in three different hospitals. The study group comprised 437 patients with a median follow of 2.6 years (0.1–7.9). The cumulative standard case survival rate at 5 years, when there were still 101 patients at risk, was 84.7% (CI-95%: 80.1–89.3%). Young age (< 60 years) was associated with a 2.2-fold increased adjusted risk of revision (CI: 1.08–4.43; p = 0.03). The preoperative presence of radiological features of patellofemoral osteoarthritis was associated with a 0.3-fold reduced adjusted risk of revision (CI: 0.11–0.89; p = 0.03). BMI > 30 kg/m2, gender, the surgeon performing the operation (either as an individual or categorised by annual surgical UKA caseload, i.e., more or less than 10 UKAs) and the hospital in which surgery took place did not predict implant survival of UKA.

We conclude that young patients (< 60 years) experience an increased early risk of revision for UKA when compared to older patients (> 60 years). Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and preoperative patellofemoral osteoarthritis are not associated with a decreased implant survival and therefore should not be considered risk factors in this context.

Introduction

The 10-year survival for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is highly variable and ranges from 80.2 to 98% [1], [2], [3]. An important condition for obtaining optimal survival of UKA is believed to be strict adherence to the indication criteria [4]. While some criteria are widely accepted, the role of patellofemoral osteoarthritis, obesity and young age remains controversial [5]. Patients with preoperative patellofemoral osteoarthritis may experience residual pain after medial UKA since only the medial compartment is replaced. The increased load in obese patients and high demanding lifestyle of young patients is believed to cause increased wear of the UKA-implant [1], [6], [7], [8]. Both situations could eventually lead to implant failure (and as a consequence to revision surgery) and for this reason are considered relative contraindications for UKA by classical guidelines [9]. More recently, the latest report of the UK National Joint Registry also raised concerns regarding implant survival for UKA in young patients [10]. In contrast, many other studies have found UKA to be a successful treatment option regardless of age, patellofemoral osteoarthritis or obesity [11], [12]. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of BMI > 30 kg/m2, young age (< 60 years) and the preoperative presence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis for early implant survival of UKA performed in patients meeting strict admission criteria.

Section snippets

Methods

The medical records and radiographs of all patients who underwent Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (Biomet, Bridgend, UK) between January 1999 and July 2007 were retrieved and studied. All procedures were carried out by or performed under supervision of 13 specialised knee surgeons in three Dutch orthopaedic centres (Isala Clinics, Martini Hospital and Medical Centre Alkmaar), using a minimally invasive surgical technique [12].

Patients were included for analysis when they

Results

A total of 534 procedures in 471 patients were initially selected for this study. From these 97 procedures were excluded from analysis (Table 1). The statistical analysis was based on a total of 437 unilateral Oxford phase III procedures in 437 patients. During the study period the number of procedures performed in each hospital averaged 28 UKAs/year (range 18–33). On average each surgeon performed 8 UKAs/year (range 1–18).

There were 140 male (32.0%) and 297 female (68.0%) patients, with a mean

Discussion

We report a 5-year survival rate of 84.7% for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Although similar results have been published, this should be considered suboptimal with established 10-year survival rates up to 98% [2], [3]. A possible explanation for our lower survival rate is that our study population was comprised of younger patients (mean age of 63 years), when compared to the patients in studies that reported better survival rates (mean age of 70 years) [2], [3]. The present study clearly

Conflict of interest

We did not use any funding to perform this study and there are no conflicting financial or personal interests that could have influenced our work.

References (30)

  • A.J. Price et al.

    Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision

    J Arthroplasty

    (2001)
  • G.N. Gillespie et al.

    Obesity and knee arthroplasty

    Knee

    (2007)
  • E. Koskinen et al.

    Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register

    Acta Orthop

    (2007)
  • D.W. Murray et al.

    The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1998)
  • U.C. Svard et al.

    Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2001)
  • P. Vorlat et al.

    The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 5-year follow-up

    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

    (2000)
  • N.P. Kort et al.

    [Medial unicompartmental knee prosthesis for patients with unicompartmental gonarthrosis]

    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

    (Oct 2004)
  • K.R. Berend et al.

    Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2005)
  • D.A. Heck et al.

    Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1993)
  • A.J. Price et al.

    Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2005)
  • S.C. Kozinn et al.

    Unicondylar knee arthroplasty

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1989)
  • No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 5th Annual Report. September 2008....
  • D.W. Murray

    Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement

    Orthopedics

    (2005)
  • E.L. Kaplan et al.

    Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations

    J Am Stat Assoc

    (1958)
  • D.G. Altman

    Practical Statistics for Medical Research

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text