Urban greenspace is associated with reduced psychological stress among adolescents: A Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA) analysis of activity space
Introduction
Psychological stress is a risk factor not only for mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, but also for a wide range of other ailments, including stroke, heart attack, and substance use disorders (Iwata et al., 2013, O’Donnell et al., 2016, Rosengren et al., 2004, Sinha, 2008). Recent research indicates that exposure to vegetation and natural areas can mitigate psychological stress by providing opportunities for physical activity and social interaction, as well as by engendering cognitive and physiological responses associated with psychological stress reduction and attention restoration following stressful experiences (Bratman, Hamilton, & Daily, 2012 Hartig, Mitchell, de Vries, & Frumkin, 2014). Such effects may be particularly pronounced for those living in urban areas, where exposure to urban vegetated or natural areas, referred to as ‘urban greenspace,’ may be limited. Indeed, research indicates that city residents have a higher level of psychological stress as compared to those living in rural areas (Dhingra et al., 2009, Lambert et al., 2015, Verheij et al., 2008). This is of particular concern given both the increasing concentration of the world’s population in cities (Turner, Nakamura, & Dinetti, 2004) and inequities in exposure and access to urban greenspace (Wolch, Byrne, & Newell, 2014). Understanding the relationship between greenspace and psychological stress among urban residents is thus of utmost concern for the development of interrelated policies on urban health, environmental justice, and greenspace infrastructure (Maller et al., 2006, Sullivan and Chang, 2011, WHO (World Health Organization), 2012).
Most observational studies of urban greenspace and psychological stress or other indicators of mental health, however, have been limited to measures of greenspace exposure based on the residential neighborhood, or where measures of greenspace exposure and stress are asynchronous or are derived from recall-based surveys (e.g. Feda, Seelbinder, Baek, & Raja, 2015; Maas et al., 2006, Markevych et al., 2014). Notably, the focus on the residential neighborhood may not adequately capture the actual exposure to an environmental condition, such as greenspace, and its effect on health, which can occur not only at the home location but also throughout an individual’s activity space, i.e. the routine places visited throughout daily life (Browning and Soller, 2014, Kwan and M.- P., 2012, Mennis and Mason, 2011). Further, recall based methods of recording the effect of contextual conditions on mood or psychological state, such as stress, are prone to error due to the lapse of time between environmental exposure and reporting (Shiffman, Stone, & Hufford, 2008).
In the present study, we aim to address these study design limitations in an investigation of the association between urban greenspace and psychological stress that utilizes in-situ and synchronous activity space-based measurements of greenspace exposure and stress. Unlike the majority of research on greenspace and mental health, which focuses on adults (Beyer et al., 2014, Roe et al., 2013, White et al., 2013), we focus here on a relatively understudied population: urban, African American adolescents. Adolescents in the U.S. report similar rates of stress as adults, which can act as a catalyst for negative health outcomes over the lifespan (APA, 2014). Mechanisms of stress for adolescents may differ from adults, however, as adolescence marks a critical developmental period, and carries a unique set of physical, sociological, and psychological stressors. As compared to adolescents generally, urban, African American adolescents may be particularly prone to additional contextual social and environmental stressors, as many African American urban neighborhoods exhibit concentrated economic disadvantage and disorder, with attendant high levels of crime, substance use, and physical decay (Brenner et al., 2013, Latkin and Curry, 2003, Mennis et al., 2016). Investigating the role of urban greenspace as a potential stress reducer among African American youth can contribute to a better understanding of the complex contextual mechanisms that influence stress among urban adolescents exposed to stressful environmental stimuli.
We use Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA), an approach integrating conventional EMA with Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to capture and link momentary data on exposure to greenspace and psychological stress in the activity spaces of a sample of urban youth residing in Richmond, Virginia. Our primary research question is: Is exposure to urban greenspace associated with lower stress among a sample of urban, primarily African American, adolescents? Additionally, we inquire whether this association differs according to characteristics of the individual adolescent and environmental context of the observation. We employ generalized estimating equations (GEE) to estimate the effect of exposure to urban greenspace on stress, while controlling for demographic characteristics. We employ tests of moderation to investigate whether this association differs according to characteristics of the individual and the environmental contexts within which the association is observed.
Section snippets
How urban greenspace affects stress
The idea of greenspace, or natural landscapes, as a place for respite and stress release for those living in cities has long been held colloquially, even going back to the writings of ancient Romans (Glacken, 1967) and the influential 19th century American urban planner Frederick Law Olmsted (1865). It is only recently, however, that scientists have turned their attention to investigating why, and how, greenspace influences psychological stress, particularly for city dwellers. Several theories
Subject recruitment
The present study uses data from the Social-Spatial Adolescent Study, a longitudinal study focusing on the contextual mechanisms of adolescent substance use. Study participants were recruited between 2012 and 2014, primarily from an adolescent medicine outpatient clinic at a large academic medical institution in Richmond, Virginia providing comprehensive primary and adolescent-specific specialty care services to over 3000 patients annually. Criteria for inclusion in the study were age
Results
The EMA yielded 24,601 responses over the two year period of the study. Of these, 10,193 contained geographic coordinates, a location data capture rate consistent with other GEMA studies in urban areas where buildings and other urban features can attenuate the GPS satellite signal (Watkins et al., 2014). We restricted our sample to EMA observations which contained valid geographic coordinates located within the Richmond, Virginia study region and for subjects for whom there were no missing data
Discussion
The present study extends previous research on greenspace and psychological stress in several ways. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate greenspace exposure and stress using momentary activity space data gathered through GEMA. This approach, which leverages advances in mobile and geospatial technologies with innovative survey techniques, affords data collection on stress and greenspace exposure in real time and in subjects’ natural environments, substantially
Conclusion
We acknowledge several limitations of this study. First, the sample is limited to 179 urban, primarily African American, adolescents recruited from a single city in Virginia. How our findings generalize to other populations of different race/ethnicity or in different urban, suburban, or rural regions is unknown. Second, the stress variable used here is a relatively simple measure of self-reported stress on a continuous 1–9 scale. More sophisticated multi-item indices of stress, physiological
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grant No. 1R01 DA031724-01A1 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, or the National Institutes of Health.
References (76)
- et al.
Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2012) - et al.
The benefits of nature experience: improved affect and cognition
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2015) - et al.
Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion, and physical activity as mediators
Social Science & Medicine
(2013) - et al.
Real-time tracking of neighborhood surroundings and mood in urban drug misusers: Application of a new method to study behavior in its geographical context
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2014) - et al.
Neighborhood green, social support, physical activity, and stress: Assessing the cumulative impact
Health and Place
(2011) - et al.
The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(2006) - et al.
The inflammasome: Pathways linking psychological stress, depression, and systemic illnesses
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
(2013) - et al.
A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2014) - et al.
A dose-response curve describing the relationship between urban tree cover density and self-reported stress recovery
Environment and Behavior
(2015) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1995)