Urban greenspace is associated with reduced psychological stress among adolescents: A Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA) analysis of activity space

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Geographic EMA is used to investigate the synchronous greenspace-stress association.

  • Urban greenspace is associated with reduced psychological stress for adolescents.

  • The association occurs only when the adolescent is away from home.

  • The association does not differ by sex, season, or emotional dysregulation.

Abstract

This study investigates the momentary association between urban greenspace, captured using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from Landsat imagery, and psychological stress, captured using Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA), in the activity spaces of a sample of primarily African American adolescents residing in Richmond, Virginia. We employ generalized estimating equations (GEE) to estimate the effect of exposure to urban greenspace on stress and test for moderation by sex, emotional dysregulation, season, neighborhood disadvantage, and whether the observation occurs at home or elsewhere. Results indicate that urban greenspace is associated with lower stress when subjects are away from home, which we speculate is due to the properties of stress reduction and attention restoration associated with exposure to natural areas, and to the primacy of other family dynamics mechanisms of stress within the home. Subjects may also seek out urban greenspaces at times of lower stress or explicitly for purposes of stress reduction. The greenspace-stress association away from home did not differ by sex, emotional dysregulation, neighborhood disadvantage, or season, the latter of which suggests that the observed greenspace-stress relationship is associated with being in a natural environment rather than strictly exposure to abundant green vegetation. Given the association of urban greenspace with lower stress found here and in other studies, future research should address the mediated pathways between greenspace, stress, and stress-related negative health outcomes for different population subgroups as a means toward understanding and addressing health disparities.

Introduction

Psychological stress is a risk factor not only for mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, but also for a wide range of other ailments, including stroke, heart attack, and substance use disorders (Iwata et al., 2013, O’Donnell et al., 2016, Rosengren et al., 2004, Sinha, 2008). Recent research indicates that exposure to vegetation and natural areas can mitigate psychological stress by providing opportunities for physical activity and social interaction, as well as by engendering cognitive and physiological responses associated with psychological stress reduction and attention restoration following stressful experiences (Bratman, Hamilton, & Daily, 2012 Hartig, Mitchell, de Vries, & Frumkin, 2014). Such effects may be particularly pronounced for those living in urban areas, where exposure to urban vegetated or natural areas, referred to as ‘urban greenspace,’ may be limited. Indeed, research indicates that city residents have a higher level of psychological stress as compared to those living in rural areas (Dhingra et al., 2009, Lambert et al., 2015, Verheij et al., 2008). This is of particular concern given both the increasing concentration of the world’s population in cities (Turner, Nakamura, & Dinetti, 2004) and inequities in exposure and access to urban greenspace (Wolch, Byrne, & Newell, 2014). Understanding the relationship between greenspace and psychological stress among urban residents is thus of utmost concern for the development of interrelated policies on urban health, environmental justice, and greenspace infrastructure (Maller et al., 2006, Sullivan and Chang, 2011, WHO (World Health Organization), 2012).

Most observational studies of urban greenspace and psychological stress or other indicators of mental health, however, have been limited to measures of greenspace exposure based on the residential neighborhood, or where measures of greenspace exposure and stress are asynchronous or are derived from recall-based surveys (e.g. Feda, Seelbinder, Baek, & Raja, 2015; Maas et al., 2006, Markevych et al., 2014). Notably, the focus on the residential neighborhood may not adequately capture the actual exposure to an environmental condition, such as greenspace, and its effect on health, which can occur not only at the home location but also throughout an individual’s activity space, i.e. the routine places visited throughout daily life (Browning and Soller, 2014, Kwan and M.- P., 2012, Mennis and Mason, 2011). Further, recall based methods of recording the effect of contextual conditions on mood or psychological state, such as stress, are prone to error due to the lapse of time between environmental exposure and reporting (Shiffman, Stone, & Hufford, 2008).

In the present study, we aim to address these study design limitations in an investigation of the association between urban greenspace and psychological stress that utilizes in-situ and synchronous activity space-based measurements of greenspace exposure and stress. Unlike the majority of research on greenspace and mental health, which focuses on adults (Beyer et al., 2014, Roe et al., 2013, White et al., 2013), we focus here on a relatively understudied population: urban, African American adolescents. Adolescents in the U.S. report similar rates of stress as adults, which can act as a catalyst for negative health outcomes over the lifespan (APA, 2014). Mechanisms of stress for adolescents may differ from adults, however, as adolescence marks a critical developmental period, and carries a unique set of physical, sociological, and psychological stressors. As compared to adolescents generally, urban, African American adolescents may be particularly prone to additional contextual social and environmental stressors, as many African American urban neighborhoods exhibit concentrated economic disadvantage and disorder, with attendant high levels of crime, substance use, and physical decay (Brenner et al., 2013, Latkin and Curry, 2003, Mennis et al., 2016). Investigating the role of urban greenspace as a potential stress reducer among African American youth can contribute to a better understanding of the complex contextual mechanisms that influence stress among urban adolescents exposed to stressful environmental stimuli.

We use Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA), an approach integrating conventional EMA with Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to capture and link momentary data on exposure to greenspace and psychological stress in the activity spaces of a sample of urban youth residing in Richmond, Virginia. Our primary research question is: Is exposure to urban greenspace associated with lower stress among a sample of urban, primarily African American, adolescents? Additionally, we inquire whether this association differs according to characteristics of the individual adolescent and environmental context of the observation. We employ generalized estimating equations (GEE) to estimate the effect of exposure to urban greenspace on stress, while controlling for demographic characteristics. We employ tests of moderation to investigate whether this association differs according to characteristics of the individual and the environmental contexts within which the association is observed.

Section snippets

How urban greenspace affects stress

The idea of greenspace, or natural landscapes, as a place for respite and stress release for those living in cities has long been held colloquially, even going back to the writings of ancient Romans (Glacken, 1967) and the influential 19th century American urban planner Frederick Law Olmsted (1865). It is only recently, however, that scientists have turned their attention to investigating why, and how, greenspace influences psychological stress, particularly for city dwellers. Several theories

Subject recruitment

The present study uses data from the Social-Spatial Adolescent Study, a longitudinal study focusing on the contextual mechanisms of adolescent substance use. Study participants were recruited between 2012 and 2014, primarily from an adolescent medicine outpatient clinic at a large academic medical institution in Richmond, Virginia providing comprehensive primary and adolescent-specific specialty care services to over 3000 patients annually. Criteria for inclusion in the study were age

Results

The EMA yielded 24,601 responses over the two year period of the study. Of these, 10,193 contained geographic coordinates, a location data capture rate consistent with other GEMA studies in urban areas where buildings and other urban features can attenuate the GPS satellite signal (Watkins et al., 2014). We restricted our sample to EMA observations which contained valid geographic coordinates located within the Richmond, Virginia study region and for subjects for whom there were no missing data

Discussion

The present study extends previous research on greenspace and psychological stress in several ways. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate greenspace exposure and stress using momentary activity space data gathered through GEMA. This approach, which leverages advances in mobile and geospatial technologies with innovative survey techniques, affords data collection on stress and greenspace exposure in real time and in subjects’ natural environments, substantially

Conclusion

We acknowledge several limitations of this study. First, the sample is limited to 179 urban, primarily African American, adolescents recruited from a single city in Virginia. How our findings generalize to other populations of different race/ethnicity or in different urban, suburban, or rural regions is unknown. Second, the stress variable used here is a relatively simple measure of self-reported stress on a continuous 1–9 scale. More sophisticated multi-item indices of stress, physiological

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant No. 1R01 DA031724-01A1 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, or the National Institutes of Health.

References (76)

  • A. Kazmierczak

    The contribution of local parks to neighborhood social ties

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2013)
  • K.G. Lambert et al.

    Brains in the city: Neurobiological effects of urbanization

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2015)
  • J. Maas et al.

    Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health

    Health and Place

    (2009)
  • M. Mason et al.

    Young adolescents' perceived activity space risk, peer networks, and substance use

    Health & Place

    (2015)
  • J. Mennis et al.

    The spatial accuracy of Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA): Error and bias due to subject and environmental characteristics

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2017)
  • J. Mennis et al.

    Does substance use moderate the association of neighborhood disadvantage with perceived stress and safety in the activity spaces of urban youth?

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2016)
  • R. Mitchell et al.

    Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study

    The Lancet

    (2008)
  • M.J. O’Donnell et al.

    Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study

    The Lancet

    (2016)
  • I.C. Rhew et al.

    Validation of the normalized difference vegetation index as a measure of neighborhood greenness

    Annals of Epidemiology

    (2011)
  • E.A. Richardson et al.

    Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2010)
  • A. Rosengren et al.

    Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study

    The Lancet

    (2004)
  • T. Sugiyama et al.

    Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2008)
  • W.C. Sullivan et al.

    Gaia meets Asclepius: Creating healthy places

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2014)
  • C.J. Tucker

    Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation

    Remote Sensing of Environments

    (1979)
  • R.S. Ulrich et al.

    Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments

    Journal of Environmental Psychology

    (1991)
  • A.E. van den Berg et al.

    Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2010)
  • D. Wang et al.

    The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2015)
  • J.R. Wolch et al.

    Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’

    Landscape and Urban Planning

    (2014)
  • D. Younan et al.

    Environmental determinants of aggression in adolescents: Role of urban neighborhood greenspace

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • American Psychological Association (2014). American Psychological Association Survey Shows Teen Stress Rivals That of...
  • T. Astell-Burt et al.

    Do low-income neighborhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities

    BMC Public Health

    (2014)
  • K.M.M. Beyer et al.

    Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: Evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    (2014)
  • G.N. Bratman et al.

    The impacts and function of nature experiences on human cognitive function and mental health

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (2012)
  • G.N. Bratman et al.

    Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2015)
  • A.B. Brenner et al.

    Neighborhood context and perceptions of stress over time: An ecological model of neighborhood stressors and intrarpersonal and interpersonal resources

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (2013)
  • D.K. Brown et al.

    View nature scenes positively affects recovery of autonomic function following acute-mental stress

    Environmental Science & Technology

    (2013)
  • C.R. Browning et al.

    Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development

    Cityscape

    (2014)
  • P.J. Curran et al.

    The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text