Derangement of transcription factor profiles during in vitro differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells
Introduction
Formation of the neutrophil granulocyte takes place in the bone marrow. A number of transcription factors play a critical role during this process and mutations of transcription factor genes may lead to aberrant maturation of neutrophils. Chromosomal translocations involving Runx1 (also called AML1) [1], and mutations or deregulation of C/EBPα [2], [3], [4] is frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Furthermore, mutations of PU.1 have in some cases been associated with AML [5] and disruption of C/EBPɛ has been observed in patients with specific granule deficiency [6].
Gene disruption studies in mice have also identified several transcription factors essential for neutrophil development. Lack of definitive hematopoiesis is observed in Runx1−/− or c-myb−/− fetuses, demonstrating their importance for all hematopoietic lineages, including neutrophils [7], [8], [9]. Mice deficient in C/EBPα completely lack mature neutrophils and eosinophils, whereas all other hematopoietic lineages are present, and function normally [10]. Immature myeloid precursor cells are found in the blood of C/EBPα knock-out mice, demonstrating that C/EBPα is essential for neutrophil differentiation [10]. Conditional knock-outs of C/EBPα have demonstrated that C/EBPα is essential for the transition from the common myeloid progenitor (CMP) to the granulocyte/macrophage restricted progenitor (GMP), but not for GMPs to terminally differentiate to mature neutrophils [11]. C/EBPɛ-deficient mice also fail to develop fully mature neutrophils and eosinophils, only atypical hyposegmented neutrophils were present [12]. Transcripts for azurophil granule proteins were detected in the bone marrow, whereas an almost complete lack of transcripts for specific granule proteins was noted [12], [13], [14]. Mice deficient in PU.1 also generate neutrophils with a block in differentiation [15], [16], [17]. Conditional knock-outs have demonstrated that PU.1 is essential for the generation of CMPs, and for the terminal maturation of GMPs to mature neutrophils [18], [19].
Analysis of knock-out mice is valuable if one wish to demonstrate the requirement of a given transcription factor for myeloid differentiation. However, due to the inherent property of knock-out studies this method only allows one to determine the earliest point of differentiation where the transcription factor in question is essential. Furthermore, as it is becoming evident that not only the presence of a transcription factor, but also its overall concentration [20], [21] – as well as its concentration relative to that of other factor transcription factors [22] – is important for lineage decision and differentiation, model systems to investigate these issues are also required. Cellular systems to study transcription factor regulation during myeloid differentiation in vitro may therefore be of great value provided the models faithfully mimick the in vivo profile of transcription factor expression.
Two human leukemic cell lines, HL60 and NB4, are widely used as models for neutrophil differentiation. The HL60 cell line was established in 1977 from a patient suffering from AML, FAB M2 [23]. The cells grow continuously as myeloblasts and can differentiate to morphologically mature looking neutrophils after addition of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) [24]. The differentiation is not complete since specific granules and gelatinase granules are not formed and transcripts for matrix proteins contained in these granules are not detectable [25], [26]. Membrane proteins of these granules are synthesized but are routed to the plasma membrane [27]. Constitutive expression of the specific granule protein NGAL in HL60 cells results in an accumulation of NGAL in the azurophil granules when the cells are at the myeloblast stage. However, when differentiation of HL60 cells is induced, newly synthesized NGAL is routed extracellularly and does not accumulate in granules, reflecting the inability of more mature HL60 cells to synthesize granules and retain granule proteins [25], [27].
The NB4 cell line was established in 1991 from a patient suffering from acute promyelocyte leukemia (APL) having the t(15;17) translocation [28]. Morphologically, the cells are characterized as promyelocytes and can be stimulated to differentiate to neutrophils by ATRA. Like HL60 cells, specific and gelatinase granules are not formed during in vitro differentiation of NB4 cells and mRNA for specific granule matrix proteins cannot be detected [29]. Also like in HL60 cells, membrane proteins of specific and gelatinase granules are synthesized when neutrophil maturation is induced and routed to the plasma membrane [30].
We have previously used a method for separation of neutrophil precursors from human bone marrow into three populations of different maturity. These are myeloblasts (MB) + promyelocytes (PM), myelocytes (MC) + metamyelocytes (MM), and band cells (BC) + segmented neutrophil cells (SC), respectively. By analyzing these populations by Northern and Western blotting, a highly individualized expression of 14 transcription factors important for neutrophil differentiation was demonstrated during in vivo granulopoiesis [31].
The purpose of this study was to correlate the expression-pattern of transcription factor mRNAs in HL60 and NB4 cells during in vitro differentiation, to the in vivo pattern referred to above and to determine whether these two leukemic cell lines may be used as model systems for transcription factor regulation during granulopoiesis.
Section snippets
In vitro differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells
HL60 cells (CCL-240) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and NB4 cells were generously provided by Dr. M. Lanotte [28]. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 with glutamax-1 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Invitrogen), 100 units/ml penicillin (Invitrogen), and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). In vitro differentiation of HL60 was induced by addition of 10−6 M ATRA (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 1.3% DMSO and of NB4 by
In vitro differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells and purification by immunomagnetic separation
To investigate the expression of transcription factors during myelopoiesis in vitro, differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells was induced by addition of 1.3% DMSO + 10−6 M ATRA and 10−6 M ATRA, respectively. Differentiation was not synchronized, as a mixture of cells of different maturity was observed at all times during in vitro differentiation. Even after 6 days of in vitro differentiation some immature cells could be identified although a large number of cells were morphologically mature. To obtain
Discussion
We wished to compare transcription factor mRNA profiles during in vitro differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells to the pattern observed in vivo. The mRNA profiles previously observed in vivo were very distinct, and steep up- and down-regulations of key factors were observed concomitantly with the transition from one cell population to another [31]. Furthermore, the protein profiles were found to match the mRNA profiles in vivo[31]. When in vitro differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells was induced,
Acknowledgements
The expert technical assistance of Inge Kobbernagel is greatly appreciated. The authors wish to thank Pia Klausen for fruitful suggestions to the experiments. This work was supported by grants from The Danish Cancer Society, The Danish Medical Research Council, Copenhagen University Hospital (H:S), and The Danish Foundation for Cancer Research.
References (47)
- et al.
Heterozygous PU.1 mutations are associated with acute myeloid leukemia
Blood
(2002) - et al.
AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis
Cell
(1996) - et al.
A functional c-myb gene is required for normal murine fetal hepatic hematopoiesis
Cell
(1991) - et al.
Enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell repopulating capacity and self-renewal in the absence of the transcription factor C/EBP alpha
Immunity
(2004) - et al.
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein epsilon is critical for effective neutrophil-mediated response to inflammatory challenge
Blood
(1999) - et al.
Myeloid transcription factor C/EBPepsilon is involved in the positive regulation of lactoferrin gene expression in neutrophils
Blood
(1999) - et al.
Neutrophils deficient in PU.1 do not terminally differentiate or become functionally competent
Blood
(1998) - et al.
The ETS family transcription factor PU.1 is necessary for the maintenance of fetal liver hematopoietic stem cells
Blood
(2004) - et al.
Distinctive and indispensable roles of PU.1 in maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiation
Blood
(2005) - et al.
Sorting of the specific granule protein, NGAL, during granulocytic maturation of HL-60 cells
Blood
(1997)
NB4, a maturation inducible cell line with t(15;17) marker isolated from a human acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3)
Blood
NB4 cells show bilineage potential and an aberrant pattern of neutrophil secondary granule protein gene expression
Blood
The in vivo profile of transcription factors during neutrophil differentiation in human bone marrow
Blood
Modulation of mRNA expression of a novel human myeloid-selective CCAAT/enhancer binding protein gene (C/EBP epsilon)
Blood
A retinoic acid-responsive human zinc finger gene, MZF-1, preferentially expressed in myeloid cells
J Biol Chem
A novel temporal expression pattern of three C/EBP family members in differentiating myelomonocytic cells
Blood
Retinoic acid regulates C/EBP homologous protein expression (CHOP), which negatively regulates myeloid target genes
Blood
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies indicate a role for CCAAT enhancer binding proteins alpha and epsilon (C/EBP alpha and C/EBP epsilon) and CDP/cut in myeloid maturation-induced lactoferrin gene expression
Blood
Regulation of neutrophil and eosinophil secondary granule gene expression by transcription factors C/EBP epsilon and PU.1
Blood
C/EBPepsilon directly interacts with the DNA binding domain of c-myb and cooperatively activates transcription of myeloid promoters
Blood
CCAAT displacement protein (CDP/cut) recognizes a silencer element within the lactoferrin gene promoter
Blood
Repressor activity of CCAAT displacement protein in HL-60 myeloid leukemia cells
J Biol Chem
Sp1 and C/EBP are necessary to activate the lactoferrin gene promoter during myeloid differentiation
Blood
Cited by (9)
MiRNA-130a regulates C/EBP-ε expression during granulopoiesis
2014, BloodCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, cells of the pEGP-miR-130a clone showed a more immature morphology with large round nuclei compared with cells of the pEGP-control clone of which some have a donut-shaped nucleus (Figure 4F). FACS analysis showed higher expression of the neutrophil differentiation marker CD11b23 in the pEGP-control clone than in the pEGP-miR-130a clone (Figure 4G), corroborating the more immature phenotype of MPRO cells with high internal miR-130a level. To discriminate between the effect of miR-130a acting through C/EBP-ε and the effect of miR-130a on the expression of other cell cycle proteins, we stably transfected the myeloblast-derived cell line 32Dcl3, which does not express C/EBP-ε,24 with miR-130a.
Autoregulatory feedback loop in human hematopoietic cells the c-myb proto-oncogene and microRNA-15a comprise an active
2009, BloodCitation Excerpt :With regard to the potential physiologic significance of miR-15a, we found that its expression increased during PMA-induced megakarycytic differentiation of K562 cells (data not shown). A recent study also showed that miR-15a was elevated during ATRA-induced NB4 myeloid differentiation.45,46 It is well documented that c-myb expression is down-regulated during these processes,47 suggesting the possibility that miR-15a may play a biologically relevant role in the inhibition of c-myb expression during hematopoietic cell differentiation.
Studying neutrophil function in vitro: Cell models and environmental factors
2021, Journal of Inflammation ResearchMicroRNA regulation of neutrophil function
2015, MicroRNAs and Other Non-Coding RNAs in Inflammation