Elsevier

Leukemia Research

Volume 35, Issue 3, March 2011, Pages 329-333
Leukemia Research

High dose cytarabine plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 19902

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2010.07.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), an anti-CD33 immunoconjugate, was combined with high dose cytarabine (HiDAC; cytarabine 3 g/m2 over 3 h daily for 5 days) for adults with relapsed or refractory AML. HiDAC plus GO 9 mg/m2 on day 7 and 4.5 mg/m2 on day 14 was not tolerated, but HiDAC followed by GO 9 mg/m2 on day 7 was safe: 12/37 (32%) patients with relapsed AML achieved complete remission. Median overall survival was 8.9 months. No grade 4 hepatic veno-occlusive disease was observed. This regimen merits further study, both in this setting and as a remission consolidation therapy.

Introduction

Therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults remains disappointing. Approximately one-third of adults between the ages of 18–60 years can expect long-term disease-free survival (DFS) with anthracycline plus cytarabine chemotherapy for remission induction, followed by consolidation with intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) [1]. The situation for older adults is worse; even among those who are treated aggressively, only 5–10% will be long-term survivors [2]. While rarely cured solely by additional chemotherapy, patients with relapsed AML can sometimes be rendered into a minimal disease state following reinduction therapy [3]. Such patients can often proceed to a curative HCT either from an allogeneic [4] or autologous [5], [6] source.

The optimal therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory AML in unclear. High dose cytarabine (HiDAC), either alone [7] or in combination with other agents [8] is commonly used. However, increasingly routine use of this therapy during induction [9] and especially during post-remission treatment [10] makes subsequent success less likely. Other agents used to treat patients with relapsed AML include gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) [11] etoposide/mitoxantrone [12], novel nucleoside analogs cladribine [13] or fludarabine [14] and non-cytotoxic agents such as flavopiridol [15] or sirolimus [16]. The wide variation in remission rates (10–50%) after these therapies reflects intrinsic differences among these agents and combinations as well as host factors, such as age, the amount of prior of therapy, and most importantly, the length of the disease-free interval preceding the relapse [17].

The most recently approved agent for the treatment of relapsed AML in adults is GO [18], [19], [20]. GO is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the CD33 antigen, expressed on blast cells from 80% to 90% of patients with AML. The antibody is conjugated to the toxin calicheamicin. When this molecule binds to a CD33-expressing cell, internalization occurs and the calicheamicin toxin is liberated in the acidic microsomal environment. When released, calicheamicin induces double strand DNA breaks and cell death. Pivotal studies were performed in 142 patients with relapsed AML whose first complete remission (CR1) lasted for at least 3 months and generally more than 6 months [18], [19], [20]. A 30% CR rate was reported, although half of these responders had incomplete platelet recovery to <100,000/μl (CRp). These data led to approval by the FDA for patients over age 60 with relapsed AML whose blasts expressed CD33. Major side effects were limited to infusion-related toxicities, reversible hepatic toxicity, and prolonged myelosuppression. Subsequent studies have described severe hepatotoxicity when GO was given alone or in combination with chemotherapy [21], or if an allogeneic HCT was done within 3 months after exposure [22]. GO has been investigated alone or in combination as frontline therapy in patients with AML [23], [24] including large randomized (MRC-15 [25] and SWOG 0106 [26]) trials, and/or as a post-remission strategy (ECOG 1900 [27] and SWOG 0106 trials). The MRC 15 trials used GO at 3 mg/m2 on day 1 of induction and consolidation chemotherapy and the SWOG 0106 trial used 6 mg/m2 on day 4 of induction therapy and then 5 mg/m2 for 3-month doses during maintenance.

The clinical trial reported here combined GO and HiDAC. These two drugs have different mechanism of actions and toxicities. We hypothesized that GO could be given safely immediately after cytarabine because it does not cause mucositis and that initial cytoreduction with HiDAC would yield a low number of residual target cells, thus allowing more concentrated binding of the anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody. Our study determined a tolerable dose of GO that could be given following a standard 5-day regimen of HiDAC. We originally hoped to employ a novel schedule wherein two doses of GO were given 7 days apart in contrast to the standard 14-day interval, but this did not prove to be feasible. We now report the Phase I component of the trial as well as the results obtained in 37 patients with relapsed AML who were treated at the recommended Phase II doses (RPTD) of cytarabine at 3 gm/m2 per day for 5 days plus GO at 9 mg/m2 on day 7.

Section snippets

Trial design

The objective of CALGB study 19902 was to define a tolerable combination of HiDAC and GO in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. One objective was to explore a novel schedule of GO given on day 1 and day 8 instead of the approved schedule that uses day 1 and day 15. Another objective was to determine the response rate of a tolerable schedule of HiDAC + GO in patients with advanced AML. The initial trial design required that patients have relapsed or primary refractory AML. CD33 expression

Study conduct and Phase I results

Sixty patients were enrolled and began study treatment. The patient demographics are depicted in Table 1 (including relapsed or refractory status per cohort) and Table 2. As expected, this was an older group of patients, most of whom were experiencing their first relapse. Only about one-third had received prior high dose ara-C; but the median duration of remission was well under one year. Institutionally derived pretreatment karyotyping data were available for 38 patients: 22 had normal

Discussion

We sought to develop a novel schedule of GO in which patients could receive two doses of the drug only 7 days apart as a way of shortening the overall period of myelosuppression commonly observed with the standard administration given 14 days apart [11], [18], [19], [20]. However, in our initial cohort of patients with advanced AML, we found the degree of leukemic reduction was insufficient to allow delineation of treatment-related hematological toxicity. Thus, the study was amended to

Conflict of Interest

No authors have conflict of interest to report except for D.H. who owns Pfizer stock.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients who enrolled in this study and the physicians, nurses, and clinical research associates at the CALGB institutions that participated. We also thank our protocol editor Michael Kelly and data coordinator Tracey Adams.

The research for CALGB 19902 was supported, in part, by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA31946) to the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Richard L. Schilsky, MD, Chairman) and to the CALGB Statistical Center (Stephen George, PhD, CA33601). The content of

References (28)

  • B.J. Bolwell et al.

    High dose cytarabine: a review

    Leukemia

    (1988)
  • A.J. Mitus et al.

    Improved survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

    J Clin Oncol

    (1995)
  • R.J. Mayer et al.

    Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • E.L. Sievers

    Efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse

    Expert Opin Biol Ther

    (2001)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Randomized phase II trial of cytosine arabinoside with and without the CHK1 inhibitor MK-8776 in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia

      2017, Leukemia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In newly diagnosed AML, AraC-based regimens lead to complete remission (CR) in up to 80% of patients, yet more than half will ultimately relapse [2]. Outcomes of salvage therapy for relapsed and refractory AML patients are worse, with only 23–32% achieving remission with high-dose AraC (HiDAc) alone, and there is scant evidence that adding a second agent improves outcomes [3–6]. The low cure rate among newly diagnosed patients and the limited effectiveness of AraC-based salvage regimens suggest that many patients harbor undetectable residual disease with either de novo or acquired AraC resistance.

    • How I treat refractory and early relapsed acute myeloid leukemia

      2015, Blood
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several phase 1/2 trials have looked at its utility in primary refractory/relapsed disease but larger phase 3 trials in this setting are missing. CR rates between 32% and 55% were observed for combinations of GO with chemotherapy.91-93 Interestingly, data from the MRC 15 trial showed that the addition of GO to induction therapy might be of significant benefit for patients with CBF AML.94

    • Phase I study of dose dense induction and consolidation with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and high dose cytarabine in older adults with AML

      2012, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There have been several studies with GO and in a phase I/II CALGB 19902 study, GO has been combined with HiDAC for induction therapy in older adult patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The authors concluded that a single dose of GO 9 mg/m2 on day 7 after 5 days of HiDAC at 3 gm/m2 is feasible.10 It is also noteworthy that while the benefits of post-remission/consolidation therapy have been established in younger AML patients, their utility in older patients continues to be debated.11

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text