Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 56, Issue 2, May 2007, Pages 247-254
Lung Cancer

A novel triplet regimen with paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine (PACCAGE) as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.12.017Get rights and content

Summary

Phase II study of 3 cycles of triplet induction chemotherapy (response, toxicity) followed by radiotherapy in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Background

Patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer are currently treated with concomitant or sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, the outcome of existing treatment modalities is unsatisfactory. Development of new strategies including more efficient systemic chemotherapy is warranted.

Objective

To study the antitumour activity and toxicity of a triplet combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine as induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy, in locally advanced NSCLC and to evaluate time to progression and survival.

Methods

Three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 by 3 h infusion on day 1), carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/(ml min) by IV bolus on day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 by IV bolus on day 1 and 8) were administered every 3 weeks in reasonably fit patients. Fractionated radiotherapy with curative intent was initiated 4 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration. Toxicity was assessed weekly during cycle 1 and on day 1 and 8 in cycles 2 and 3. Response evaluation was performed at the end of cycle 3.

Results

Forty-eight patients (20 stage IIIA and 28 stage IIIB) received a total of 134 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-two patients received the intended 3 cycles. Thirty patients obtained an objective response (1 complete and 29 partial response) or 62.5% on the intent to treat analysis (95% confidence interval: 49–76%). None of the responders became eligible for surgery. The median time to progression and survival for all patients was 10.1 and 15.7 month, respectively. A significant difference was observed in survival parameters between stage IIIA and stage IIIB patients.

Haematological toxicity grade 3/4, mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, was most prominent on day 15 of the treatment cycles. Haematological support by means of recombinant erythropoietin, red blood cell or platelet transfusion, filgrastim administration or a combination was needed in 21 patients. None of the patients discontinued chemotherapy because of haematotoxicity.

Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity leading to chemotherapy withdrawal occurred early during induction (2 and 1 in cycles 1 and 2, respectively).

Conclusion

Three cycles of the novel triplet combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine (PACCAGE) is an active and feasible induction regimen for patients with locally advanced inoperable NSCLC. Neutropenia and to a lesser extent thrombocytopenia represent the main haematological toxicity. Whether this triplet regimen can improve outcome when compared to specific cisplatin doublet regimens should be evaluated in a phase III study.

Introduction

The treatment of patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC with chemotherapy has evolved during the last decade. Cisplatin based doublet chemotherapy produced a significant but albeit modest improvement in overall survival, quality of life and symptom control as compared to best supportive care [1], [2], [3], [4]. Several new agents have been introduced in the clinic and shown to be active in NSCLC, with response rates of approximately 20% for single drugs and a favourable toxicity profile [5]. In particular, paclitaxel used in different schedules has produced response rates exceeding 20% and a 1-year survival in the range of 40% [6], [7]. Subsequently, paclitaxel has been safely combined with cisplatin [8] and carboplatin [9]. The latter combination has proved active, tolerable and easy to administer and has been included in several phase III trials. Currently a chemotherapy regimen combining a platinum-derivative (either cis- or carboplatin) and one of the more recent drugs (paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine) is considered standard therapy for stage IIIB-IV NSCLC [5], [10]. The modest toxicity of the two-drug combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin and the favourable toxicity profile of gemcitabine lead to the exploration of a three-drug combination with gemcitabine [11]. Phase I–II studies indicated the feasibility of this approach in advanced stage NSCLC: the triplet regimen with paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine was active in this setting at the expense of mainly myelosuppression [12], [13], [14]. A recently published phase II–III trial in stage IIIB–IV NSCLC demonstrated a significant increase in response, time to progression and survival when gemcitabine was added to paclitaxel and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin alone [15].

The integration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in a multidisciplinary program has led to a significant superior survival compared to radiotherapy alone in locally advanced unresectable stage IIIA–IIIB NSCLC [16]. Controversy still exists with respect to the optimal timing of both treatment modalities (sequential or concomitant). Nevertheless if the results of the available randomised studies of sequential versus concomitant chemo-radiotherapy are pooled, the concomitant administration appears to produce a survival advantage at the expense of acute local toxicity mainly esophagitis and pneumonitis [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Most of these results have been published in full and both strategies are an acceptable standard. We report here the results of a phase II study of 3 cycles of the triplet paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine preceding definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable stage IIIA–IIIB NSCLC. Because induction chemotherapy was followed by radiotherapy in eligible patients, time to progression and survival data are detailed as well.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Patients from a single institution older than 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC, clinical stage IIIA or IIIB (without malignant pleural effusion), Karnofsky performance score of 80–100, who were not candidates for curative surgery, who had not undergone previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy, did not suffer from a previous cancer (except for basocellular epithelioma of the skin or in situ cancer of the cervix assumed to be cured with a follow up of more than 5 years)

Treatment delivery

Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Sixteen patients presented with T3 and sixteen with T4 tumors. The patients with T1 (6) and T2 (10) tumors were classified in the stage IIIA or IIIB category based on the mediastinal nodal status (N2 or N3). Forty-seven out of 48 registered patients received at least one course of therapy. One patient was withdrawn from chemotherapy within minutes after the administration of the first dose of paclitaxel because of a grade 3 anaphylactic reaction.

Discussion

The current standard of treatment of patients with locally advanced NSCLC is a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It is presently not clear in which sequence both treatment modalities should be combined (sequentially, concomitantly or both) nor has the optimal chemotherapy regimen been established [16]. A number of randomised studies of which the majority has been published at full length, suggest that concurrent chemoradiotherapy leads to a survival advantage compared to the

Conflict of interest statement

Free drug provided by BMS and E. Lilly and unrestricted grants to the department of Medical Oncology not exceeding 10.000 euro from BMS and E. Lilly.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Mr. A. Dewaele for his valuable help in datamanagement, Mrs. I. Bettens for secretarial assistance, the pharmaceutical companies BMS and E. Lilly Belgium for providing free drugs and support without restrictions.

References (28)

  • J. Von Pauwel et al.

    Phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

    Semin Oncol

    (1996)
  • P. Bonomi

    Review of paclitaxel-carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

    Semin Oncol

    (1999)
  • J.H. Schiller et al.

    Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • K. Kelly

    The role of single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

    Ann Oncol

    (1999)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Final overall results of a study with a novel triplet induction chemotherapy regimen (PACCAGE) followed by consolidation radiotherapy in locally advanced inoperable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

      2009, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      No dose reescalation was allowed if a dose had to be reduced previously. The details of the guidelines and procedures of dose reductions on days 1 and 8 of each cycle according to hematological and nonhematological toxicity were published before.12 Radiotherapy was initiated at least 4 weeks after completion and recovery from induction chemotherapy toxicity.

    • Complete metabolic tumour response, assessed by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (<sup>18</sup>FDG-PET), after induction chemotherapy predicts a favourable outcome in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

      2008, Lung Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Trials assessing the prognostic value of post-treatment 18FDG-PET described a correlation between 18FDG-PET findings and survival concluding that 18FDG-PET may have a role in the prediction of prognosis after treatment [9–14]. In the current explorative study, patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC were treated with three cycles of a novel induction chemotherapy regimen (PACCAGE) followed by consolidation radiotherapy [15]. CT and 18FDG-PET were performed before and after induction chemotherapy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Deceased.

    View full text