Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 112, October 2017, Pages 75-80
Lung Cancer

Research paper
MHC class II expression in lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.030Get rights and content

Highlights

  • MHC Class II was expressed both in NSCLC cell lines and tissues.

  • MHC Class II was not detected in SCLC cell lines or tissue tumor cells.

  • Lower expression of MHC Class II on SCLC may be a means of escaping anti-cancer immunity.

  • Higher MHC Class II expression on TILs was correlated with better prognosis in NSCLC.

Abstract

Background

Immunotherapy is an exciting development in lung cancer research. In this study we described major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II protein expression in lung cancer cell lines and patient tissues.

Methods

We studied MHC Class II (DP, DQ, DR) (CR3/43, Abcam) protein expression in 55 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines, 42 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines and 278 lung cancer patient tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

Seven (12.7%) NSCLC cell lines were positive for MHC Class II. No SCLC cell lines were found to be MHC Class II positive. We assessed 139 lung cancer samples available in the Hirsch Lab for MHC Class II. There was no positive MHC Class II staining on SCLC tumor cells. MHC Class II expression on TILs in SCLC was significantly lower than that on TILs in NSCLC (P  0.001). MHC Class II was also assessed in an additional 139 NSCLC tumor tissues from Medical University of Gdansk, Poland. Patients with positive staining of MHC Class II on TILs had longer regression-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those whose TILs were MHC Class II negative (2.980 years, 95% CI 1.628–4.332 vs. 1.050 years, 95% CI 0.556–1.554, P = 0.028) (3.230 years, 95% CI 2.617–3.843 vs. 1.390 years, 95% CI 0.629–2.151, P = 0.014).

Conclusions

MHC Class II was expressed both in NSCLC cell lines and tissues. However, MHC Class II was not detected in SCLC cell lines or tissue tumor cells. MHC Class II expression was lower on SCLC TILs than on NSCLC TILs. Loss of expression of MHC Class II on SCLC tumor cells and reduced expression on SCLC TILs may be a means of escaping anti-cancer immunity. Higher MHC Class II expression on TILs was correlated with better prognosis in patients with NSCLC.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide [1]. Chemotherapy as a standard first line therapy has a poor prognosis. Targeted therapy offers new treatment opportunities for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [2], [3], [4]. However, only a small population harbors driving mutations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutation could benefit from these targeted therapies. Moreover, acquired resistance to targeted drugs remains big obstacle to prolonging survival [4]. Therefore, other effective therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC are urgently needed.

Recently, anti-PD 1 or anti-PD L1 antibodies have shown promising results in cancers including renal, lung and melanoma [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Unfortunately, less than one quarter of patients are candidates for anti-PD 1/PD L1 therapy, other strategies, such as regulating other checkpoint factors, should be investigated further.

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II could internalize, process, and present an antigen to the helper T-cell. The antigens presented by Class II peptides are derived from extracellular proteins. Loading of a MHC Class II molecule occurs by phagocytosis; extracellular proteins are endocytosed, digested in lysosomes, and the resulting epitopic peptide fragments are loaded onto MHC Class II molecules prior to their migration to the cell surface. MHC Class II is constitutively expressed in professional, immune antigen presenting cells, but may also be induced on other cells by interferon γ [10]. This antigen has a restricted tissue distribution and is present primarily on immune cells such as B-lymphocytes, activated T-lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages, and dendritic cells [11], [12].SCLC cell lines were described as having low or absent expression of MHC Class I major histocompatibility complex antigens [13]. Until now, we didn’t know the expression of MHC Class II in lung cancer. In this study, we described the protein expression of MHC class II in patients with lung cancer and its association with survival.

Section snippets

Cell lines

Two tissue micro arrays (TMAs) containing 55 NSCLC cell lines and 42 SCLC cell lines were produced in the Hirsch Lab. Cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 media with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were harvested, fixed overnight, mixed with 0.9% agarose then allowed to solidify at room temperature for at least 5 min. Each solidified agar pellet was gently placed in a cassette and submerged in 70% ethyl alcohol. The pellets were processed and embedded in paraffin blocks. Cores were taken from each

MHC class II in lung cancer cells and its correlation with E746-A750del, L858R EGFR, ALK fusion and ROS1 rearrangement

Seven (12.7%) NSCLC cell lines were expressed MHC class II (Fig. 1.). None of the SCLC cell lines were found to be MHC Class II, E746-A750del, L858R EGFR, ALK fusion or ROS1-rearrangement positive. There was no correlation between MHC Class II expression and EGFR E746-A750del (P = 0.116), L858R (P = 0.571), ALK fusion (P = 0.341) and ROS1-rearrangement (P = 0.127) in NSCLC cell lines (Table S1.).

MHC class II protein expression in lung cancer tumor tissues

We assessed in one hundred and thirty-nine lung cancer samples from Hirsch Lab for MHC Class II expression.

Discussion

In our study, we assayed the expression of MHC Class II protein on tumor cells and TILs in NSCLC patients and described its association with survival. Additionally, we found MHC Class II was expressed in both NSCLC cell lines and tissues. However, MHC Class II expression was absent in SCLC cell lines and tissue tumor cells. Moreover, SCLC TILs expressed MHC Class II less than NSCLC TILs. Higher MHC Class II expression on TILs was correlated with better prognosis in patients with NSCLC.

MHC Class

Conflicts and interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This project was supported by the IASLC Young Investigator Award, the Pia and Fred R. Hirsch Endowed Chair at the University of Colorado, and Shanghai Pujiang Program (17PJD036). Major disease clinical skills enhancement program of three year action plan for promoting clinical skills and clinical innovation in municipal hospitals, Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center (16CR1001A).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank than Fred R Hirsch and Caicun Zhou for their support.

References (32)

  • L. Cameron et al.

    New treatment options for ALK-Rearranged non-Small cell lung cancer

    Curr. Treat. Options Oncol.

    (2015)
  • C. Thoma

    CheckMate for advanced-stage ccRCC? Nivolumab and cabozantinib aMETEORate poor survival

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2015)
  • L. Hutchinson

    Lung cancer: squiring immunotherapy to CheckMate

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2015)
  • A. Errico Melanoma

    CheckMate 067–frontline nivolumab improves PFS alone or in combination with ipilimumab

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2015)
  • E.B. Walker et al.

    gp100(209-2 M) peptide immunization of human lymphocyte antigen-A2+ stage I-III melanoma patients induces significant increase in antigen-specific effector and long-term memory CD8+ T cells

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2004)
  • J.G. Nuchtern et al.

    Class II MHC molecules can use the endogenous pathway of antigen presentation

    Nature

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text