ReviewManaging depression in older age: Psychological interventions
Introduction
It is well-established that psychological interventions are effective in the treatment of depression in adults, and that includes cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) [1], interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) [2], behavioral activation therapy [3], problem-solving therapy (PST) [4], and possibly psychodynamic therapy [5] and non-directive counseling [6]. Whether psychological therapies are also effective in older adults has been less well-established. Depression in older adults tends to be more chronic than in their younger counterparts. And due to such a chronic nature and developmental stage that increase individual's exposure risk factors (e.g., medical condition, loss and grief, decreasing social support), psychotherapies may be less effective in older adults than in their younger counterparts.
Although several trials with different kinds of psychological treatment have focused specifically on older adults, the field is changing rapidly. In an earlier meta-analysis of these studies, we included 25 randomized trials [7], and other meta-analyses from this period included comparable numbers of studies [8], [9], [10]. Since 2010, however, 15 more randomized trials have been conducted, indicating that the field is expanding rapidly. It may be possible to examine research questions that were not answered sufficiently with meta-analyses of earlier trials. For example, several new trials have focused on life review treatments of depression, and earlier meta-analyses had to be careful in drawing definite conclusions on this type of therapy.
Since the overall meta-analyses focusing on psychological treatments in older adults from 2006 to 2008, no general meta-analyses have been conducted. Meta-analyses that were conducted since focused on specific types of therapies [11], [12], [13], [14]. We decided therefore, to conduct a new meta-analysis of trials on psychological treatments of depression in older adults. Because the number of trials has increased since the previous comprehensive meta-analysis, we focus specifically on subgroup analyses. In these subgroup analyses we can examine whether specific characteristics of the studies are associated with higher or lower effect sizes, for example different types of psychotherapy, types of control groups, recruitment methods, diagnosis, or treatment format.
Section snippets
Identification and selection of studies
We constructed a database of papers on the psychological treatment of depression that has been described in detail elsewhere [15] and that has been used in a series of earlier published meta-analyses (www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org). This database has been continuously updated through comprehensive literature searches (from 1966 to January 2014). In these searches, we examined 14,902 abstracts from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Trials. These abstracts were
Selection of studies and characteristics of included studies
Fig. 1 presents a flowchart describing the inclusion process. Of the 1613 retrieved full-text papers, 1569 were excluded (Fig. 1), while 44 studies met inclusion criteria [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68]. In the included studies, 4409 patients participated (2512 in
Discussion
In this updated meta-analysis of psychological treatments of depression in older adults, we could confirm that these treatments have moderate to high effect on depression, which were maintained at 6 months or longer post-randomization. The effects are probably overestimated because of publication bias and because of the low quality of several of the included studies. In the subgroup analyses, we could confirm that CBT is an effective treatment for older adults, as confirmed in earlier
Contributors
PC had the original idea for this paper. PC and EK did the data extraction and analyses. All authors read all versions of the text of the paper critically and contributed significantly to the content.
Competing interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
CFR was in part supported by NIMH grant P30MH90333. The other authors have received no funding for this article.
Provenance and peer review
Commissioned and externally peer reviewed.
References (73)
- et al.
The efficacy of problem solving therapy in reducing mental and physical health problems: a meta-analysis
Clin Psychol Rev
(2007) - et al.
The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis
Clin Psychol Rev
(2010) - et al.
The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: a meta-analysis
Clin Psychol Rev
(2012) - et al.
Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice
Biol Psychiatry
(2006) - et al.
Problem-solving therapy versus supportive therapy in geriatric major depression with executive dysfunction
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
Depression in homebound older adults: problem-solving therapy and personal and social resourcefulness
Behav Ther
(2013) - et al.
Competitive Memory Training for treating depression and rumination in depressed older adults: a randomized controlled trial
Behav Res Ther
(2011) - et al.
How effective is bibliotherapy for very old adults with subthreshold depression? A randomized controlled trial
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
(2011) - et al.
Home-delivered problem adaptation therapy (PATH) for depressed, cognitively impaired, disabled elders: a preliminary study
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Dialectical behavior therapy for depressed older adults: a randomized pilot study
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
(2003)