Elsevier

Maturitas

Volume 79, Issue 2, October 2014, Pages 160-169
Maturitas

Review
Managing depression in older age: Psychological interventions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.027Get rights and content

Abstract

The number of studies on psychological treatments of depression in older adults has increased considerably in the past years. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of these studies. A total of 44 studies comparing psychotherapies to control groups, other therapies or pharmacotherapy could be included. The overall effect size indicating the difference between psychotherapy and control groups was g = 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.80), which corresponds with a NNT of 3. These effects were maintained at 6 months or longer post randomization (g = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.16–0.37). Specific types of psychotherapies that were found to be effective included cognitive behavior therapy (g = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.29–0.60), life review therapy (g = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36–0.82) and problem-solving therapy (g = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.18–0.74). Treatment compared to waiting list control groups resulted in larger effect sizes than treatments compared to care-as-usual and other control groups (p < 0.05). Studies with lower quality resulted in higher effect sizes than high-quality studies (p < 0.05). Direct comparisons between different types of psychotherapy suggested that cognitive behavior therapy and problem-solving therapy may be more effective than non-directive counseling and other psychotherapies may be less effective than other therapies. This should be considered with caution, however, because of the small number of studies. There were not enough studies to examine the long-term effects of psychotherapies and to compare psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy or combined treatments. We conclude that it is safe to assume that psychological therapies in general are effective in late-life depression, and this is especially well-established for cognitive behavior therapy and problem-solving therapy.

Introduction

It is well-established that psychological interventions are effective in the treatment of depression in adults, and that includes cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) [1], interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) [2], behavioral activation therapy [3], problem-solving therapy (PST) [4], and possibly psychodynamic therapy [5] and non-directive counseling [6]. Whether psychological therapies are also effective in older adults has been less well-established. Depression in older adults tends to be more chronic than in their younger counterparts. And due to such a chronic nature and developmental stage that increase individual's exposure risk factors (e.g., medical condition, loss and grief, decreasing social support), psychotherapies may be less effective in older adults than in their younger counterparts.

Although several trials with different kinds of psychological treatment have focused specifically on older adults, the field is changing rapidly. In an earlier meta-analysis of these studies, we included 25 randomized trials [7], and other meta-analyses from this period included comparable numbers of studies [8], [9], [10]. Since 2010, however, 15 more randomized trials have been conducted, indicating that the field is expanding rapidly. It may be possible to examine research questions that were not answered sufficiently with meta-analyses of earlier trials. For example, several new trials have focused on life review treatments of depression, and earlier meta-analyses had to be careful in drawing definite conclusions on this type of therapy.

Since the overall meta-analyses focusing on psychological treatments in older adults from 2006 to 2008, no general meta-analyses have been conducted. Meta-analyses that were conducted since focused on specific types of therapies [11], [12], [13], [14]. We decided therefore, to conduct a new meta-analysis of trials on psychological treatments of depression in older adults. Because the number of trials has increased since the previous comprehensive meta-analysis, we focus specifically on subgroup analyses. In these subgroup analyses we can examine whether specific characteristics of the studies are associated with higher or lower effect sizes, for example different types of psychotherapy, types of control groups, recruitment methods, diagnosis, or treatment format.

Section snippets

Identification and selection of studies

We constructed a database of papers on the psychological treatment of depression that has been described in detail elsewhere [15] and that has been used in a series of earlier published meta-analyses (www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org). This database has been continuously updated through comprehensive literature searches (from 1966 to January 2014). In these searches, we examined 14,902 abstracts from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Trials. These abstracts were

Selection of studies and characteristics of included studies

Fig. 1 presents a flowchart describing the inclusion process. Of the 1613 retrieved full-text papers, 1569 were excluded (Fig. 1), while 44 studies met inclusion criteria [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68]. In the included studies, 4409 patients participated (2512 in

Discussion

In this updated meta-analysis of psychological treatments of depression in older adults, we could confirm that these treatments have moderate to high effect on depression, which were maintained at 6 months or longer post-randomization. The effects are probably overestimated because of publication bias and because of the low quality of several of the included studies. In the subgroup analyses, we could confirm that CBT is an effective treatment for older adults, as confirmed in earlier

Contributors

PC had the original idea for this paper. PC and EK did the data extraction and analyses. All authors read all versions of the text of the paper critically and contributed significantly to the content.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

CFR was in part supported by NIMH grant P30MH90333. The other authors have received no funding for this article.

Provenance and peer review

Commissioned and externally peer reviewed.

References (73)

  • M. Snarski et al.

    The effects of behavioral activation therapy with inpatient geriatric psychiatry patients

    Behav Ther

    (2011)
  • L.W. Thompson et al.

    Comparison of desipramine and cognitive/behavioral therapy in the treatment of elderly outpatients with mild-to-moderate depression

    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • L.W. Thompson et al.

    Efficacy of psychotherapy in the treatment of late-life depression

    Adv Behav Res Ther

    (1984)
  • A. van Schaik et al.

    Interpersonal psychotherapy for elderly patients in primary care

    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • V.M. Wuthrich et al.

    Randomised controlled trial of group cognitive behavioural therapy for comorbid anxiety and depression in older adults

    Behav Res Ther

    (2013)
  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: a meta-analysis

    Clin Psychol Rev

    (2010)
  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    A meta-analysis of cognitive behavior therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison to other treatments

    Can J Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    Interpersonal psychotherapy of depression: A meta-analysis

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • D. Ekers et al.

    A meta-analysis of randomized trials of behavioral treatment of depression

    Psychol Med

    (2008)
  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    Psychological treatment of late-life depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • M. Pinquart et al.

    Effects of psychotherapy and other behavioral interventions on clinically depressed older adults: a meta-analysis

    Aging Ment Health

    (2007)
  • M. Pinquart et al.

    Treatments for later-life depressive conditions: a meta-analytic comparison of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • K.C. Wilson et al.

    Psychotherapeutic treatments for older depressed people

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • Z.1 Samad et al.

    The effectiveness of behavioural therapy for the treatment of depression in older adults: a meta-analysis

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • M. Pinquart et al.

    Effects of reminiscence interventions on psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis

    Aging Mental Health

    (2012)
  • R.L. Gould et al.

    Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in older people: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2012)
  • M. Krishna et al.

    Is group psychotherapy effective in older adults with depression? A systematic review

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    Psychological treatment of depression: a meta-analytic database of randomized studies

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (2008)
  • L.V. Hedges et al.

    Statistical methods for meta-analysis

    (1985)
  • M. Borenstein et al.

    Introduction to meta-analysis

    (2009)
  • A. Laupacis et al.

    An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment

    N Engl J Med

    (1988)
  • J.P.A. Ioannidis et al.

    Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses

    Br Med J

    (2007)
  • N. Orsini et al.

    Heterogi: Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

    (2005)
  • S. Duval et al.

    Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis

    Biometrics

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text