A mathematical model to study the effects of drugs administration on tumor growth dynamics
Introduction
The in vivo evaluation of the effects of an antitumor drug is an important step in preclinical development of oncology drugs. For this purpose, several experiments are usually performed, in which human tumor cells from immortalized cell lines are inoculated into athymic mice. Some of these animals are then treated with antitumor drugs and the tumor volumes are measured at different times in both treated and untreated mice. The ability of the drug to inhibit tumor growth is usually measured comparing the average tumor weights in treated and control animals at the end of experiment, thus allowing the comparison and ranking of different compounds or different dosages/schedules of the same compound. As discussed in [1], [2], [3] the growth dynamics of inoculated cells can be considered a good model of the tumor growth dynamics in human.
Building a mathematical model of the tumor growth that assesses drug efficacy on the basis of the whole time series of tumor weights instead of adopting a criterion simply based on a single measurement at the end of the treatment is a challenging task. At the same time, a model able to correctly predict experimental data (without actually performing the experiment) would be of great value in order to save time and money in the drug discovery process. To be of practical use, such a model should be able to: (i) describe the observed tumor growth curves using few physically meaningful parameters, identifiable from experimental data; (ii) make predictions of tumor growth kinetics in response to different treatments (i.e. dosages/schedules); (iii) assess drug potency (independently of the dose levels and schedules).
Over the past two decades, in vivo growth kinetics of solid tumors has been extensively studied and several mathematical models have appeared in the literature. Tumor growth is a complicated phenomenon involving several correlated processes and the existing studies reflect different paradigms, ranging from simple and empirical models to more complex functional ones. The former use empirical mathematical equations (e.g. sigmoidal functions such as logistic, Verhulst, Gompertz, and von Bertalanffy) to describe the growth curve of macroscopic variables such as volume, mass or size of cellular population [4], [5]. Their aim is to model the tumor growth even without a mechanistic description of the underlying physiological processes. A drawback of this class of models is that it is not straightforward to predict the modification of the growth curve in response to changes in the drug administration schedule. Functional models, conversely, are based on a set of assumptions about biological growth reflecting a microscopic viewpoint, involving cell cycle kinetics and/or cell–cell interactions [6], [7]. Such models usually represent the cell population in its heterogeneity; in the simplest case the whole population consists of two subpopulations only: the proliferating and the quiescent [8]. More complex models describe population as age-structured and take into account more than two subpopulations related to specific phases of the mitotic cell cycle. In some cases, they take into account also the spatial disposition of tumor cells. These models, based on well-understood biological principles, are generally complex with a much larger number of parameters compared to empirical models [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. As a consequence, it is generally difficult to fit functional models versus experimental data since overparametrization can be avoided only if further ‘microscopic’ observations are available (e.g. flow cytometry, PET, etc.) [14], [15].
This paper analyzes a new mathematical model, identifiable from experiments performed in nude mice as part of the typical drug research and development project, able to assess drug potency and predict tumor growth in response of different treatments.
Section snippets
The experimental setting
We consider experiments for the preclinical evaluation of antitumor drugs, in which fragments of 20–30 mg of tumor, coming from human carcinoma cell lines maintained by subcutaneous transplantation in athymic mice, are implanted in mice. One week after the inoculation, mice show a palpable tumor of approximately 100–200 mm3. Then, mice are selected, randomized and divided into two or more groups (in general each including eight animals). One to six days after the randomization, an anticancer
Model formulation
In this section two models, called unperturbed- and perturbed-growth model, will be formulated in order to fit the experimental tumor growth data in controls and in treated animals, respectively.
Model analysis
In this section the dynamic system (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) describing the perturbed tumor growth is analyzed. In particular, we search for the possible equilibrium points of the system when the drug is administered through an infusion yielding a (steady-state) constant concentration , and we study their stability (both local and global). Then, we obtain the minimum constant concentration that asymptotically guarantees the tumor eradication and define a time efficacy index that
Model identification
The model presented in this paper has been validated on several data sets obtained within industrial research programs and partially published in [20]. In the following, some experimental data relative to an anticancer candidate are used to illustrate the model and test its validity.
Discussion
In this paper we have analyzed a new model recently proposed to evaluate the effects of antitumor drugs on tumor growth in animal models [20]. The model, based on only five physiologically relevant parameters, can be identified from typical experiments performed during the preclinical development of oncology drugs. Three parameters (w0, λ0, λ1) describe the tumor kinetics in absence of a drug treatment, whereas the other two parameters (k1, k2) describe the effects of the drug. As shown in this
Acknowledgments
This work was in part supported by MIUR-PRIN Project ‘New methods and algorithms for identification and adaptive control of technological systems’ and by MIUR-FIRB Project RBNE01HWWR. We thank V. Croci and E. Pesenti for their support, in particular for what concerns the experimental part of this study.
References (21)
- et al.
Use of a surrogate marker (human secreted alkaline phosphatase) to monitor in vivo tumor growth and anticancer drug efficacy in ovarian cancer xenografts
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2000) - et al.
Generalized two-parameter equation of growth
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(1993) - et al.
Conceptual frameworks for mathematical modeling of tumor growth dynamics
Math. Comput. Modell.
(1996) - et al.
A mathematical model to study the effects of drug resistance and vasculature on the response of solid tumors to chemotherapy
Math. Biosci.
(2000) - et al.
Cancer treatment by telomerase inhibitors: predictions by a kinetic model
Math. Biosci.
(2003) - et al.
Gompertzian growth and cell population dynamics
Math. Biosci.
(2003) - et al.
A theoretical analysis of interval drug dosing for cell-cycle-phase-specific drugs
Math. Bio.
(1992) - et al.
A mathematical model of cycle-specific chemotherapy
Math. Comput. Modell.
(1995) Avascular growth, angiogenesis and vasculare growth in solid tumors: the mathematical modelling of the stages of tumor development
Math. Comput. Modell.
(1996)- et al.
Asynchronous exponential growth in an age structured population of proliferating and quiescent cells
Math. Biosci.
(2002)
Cited by (78)
Long-life control of tumor growth via synchronizing to a less severe case
2021, Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlDerivation of an optimal trajectory and nonlinear adaptive controller design for drug delivery in cancerous tumor chemotherapy
2019, Computers in Biology and MedicineEvaluation and translation of combination therapies in oncology – A quantitative approach
2018, European Journal of PharmacologyPhase transitions in tumor growth: III vascular and metastasis behavior
2016, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsModel-based prediction of effective target exposure for MEN1611 in combination with trastuzumab in HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients
2023, CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology