Chromatin and epigenetic determinants of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) signaling

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.026Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

The oestrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) is a transcription factor that potentiates the response to diverse stimuli, including oestrogen and growth factors, in various tissue types. Its recruitment to the DNA is directly regulated by the chromatin landscape, inclusive of chromatin compaction and epigenetic modifications. In this review we discuss our current understanding of the interplay between ESR1 signaling and the chromatin landscape. We present how the chromatin landscape primes the lineage-specific response and contributes to stimuli-specific signaling. Finally, we discuss recent efforts to decipher the relationship between genetic and epigenetic as it relates to ESR1 signaling in breast cancer.

Introduction

Our genome holds the genetic code that potentiates its interaction with DNA binding proteins, including transcription factors such as the estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) (Kumar et al., 1987, Kumar and Chambon, 1988, ENCODE Project Consortium et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012). The vast majority of DNA motifs recognized by transcription factors are short sequences (ranging in size between 5 and 19 nucleotides long) that are commonly found across the genome (Wingender, 1988, Sandelin et al., 2004, Bilu and Barkai, 2005, Neph et al., 2012). However, the DNA in eukaryotic cells is progressively folded into a higher complexity structure called chromatin, where nucleosomes form the basic unit. This ensures that the genome can be stored within the finite space provided by the nucleus (Fussner et al., 2011) but also imposes restriction on DNA accessibility that affects DNA motif recognition by transcription factors with direct consequences on transcriptional regulation.

Nucleosomes consist of approximately 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins, where two members of the four core histones, namely H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, are typically present (Luger et al., 1997). Their N-terminal tail protrudes outside from the nucleosomes which renders them accessible for post-translational modifications (PTM) by chromatin modifiers, either “writers” or “erasers” (Jenuwein and Allis, 2001, Henikoff and Shilatifard, 2011). Known PTMs include phosphorylation, ubiquitination, isomerization, deamination, ADP ribosylation, acetylation and methylation (Kouzarides, 2007). At least seven, nine and 23 different residues in the N-terminal tails of H2A or H2B, H4 and H3, respectively, can be post-translationally modified (Kouzarides, 2007, Dawson and Kouzarides, 2012). The diverse combinations of these PTMs on a single nucleosome or on a series of neighboring nucleosomes have given rise to the concept of the epigenetic code (Jenuwein and Allis, 2001), where each unique combination of PTMs associates with distinct functional features of the genome (Ernst and Kellis, 2010, Ernst et al., 2011). For instance, nucleosomes trimethylated on lysine 4 and 27 of histone 3 (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3) associate with poised promoters while the acetylation of K27 combined with H3K4me3 preferentially maps to promoters engaged in transcription (Mikkelsen et al., 2007). Mono- and di-methylation of lysine 4 of histone 3 (H3K4me1/me2) is enriched at transcription factor-bound enhancers (Heintzman et al., 2007, Lupien et al., 2008, Ernst et al., 2011), and directs cell type-specific transcription factor binding (Lupien et al., 2008, Heintzman et al., 2009, ENCODE Project Consortium et al., 2012). Genome-wide mapping of these epigenetic modifications has started to reveal the complex epigenetic nature of the human genome and is allowing for its annotation beyond coding sequences (Ernst and Kellis, 2010, Ernst et al., 2011).

Nucleosomes found across the human genome exhibit various degrees of mobility. They can also be repositioned in response to transcriptional activity (Bintu et al., 2012). This allows for the DNA found between nucleosomes, known as linker DNA, to be made accessible to DNA binding proteins such as transcription factors (Schneider and Grosschedl, 2007, Bell et al., 2011, Thurman et al., 2012). Different families of chromatin remodelers and pioneer factors can actively reposition nucleosomes (Hargreaves and Crabtree, 2011, Magnani et al., 2011b). These frequently co-localize to the chromatin with transcription factors to facilitate their binding through nucleosome remodeling (Wang et al., 2012, Li et al., 2012b). Assays such as DNase-seq or FAIRE-seq can profile the extent of chromatin remodeling resulting in openness across the genome (Song et al., 2011). Chromatin openness profiling combined with epigenetic mapping and transcription across a large collection of cell lines has led to systematic characterization of over 80% of our genome as being biochemically active and potentially involved in regulating expression (ENCODE Project Consortium et al., 2012).

In this review, we discuss how the chromatin landscape relates to ESR1 signaling. Specifically, we describe how binding is achieved through a coordinated effort involving specialized transcription factors along with histone modifications, epigenetic regulatory factors and chromatin remodelers. Finally, we discuss how defects in the epigenetic machinery can influence the development and proliferation of ESR1-positive breast cancer.

Section snippets

Chromatin accessibility modulates ESR1 signaling

Many transcription factors bind their target sequence in a developmentally restricted time and at discrete positions along the genome (Shen et al., 2012). Others, such as the nuclear receptor ESR1, are recruited to the chromatin of differentiated cells in response to extracellular stimuli. While ESR1 can be activated by a wide-range of stimuli, its response following estrogen stimulation has been the most exhaustively studied. Estrogen induces the recruitment of ESR1 preferentially to regions

Pioneer factors restrict ESR1 binding to the chromatin

Genome-wide maps of DHS are cell type-specific and reflect changes in chromatin compaction occurring across the genome throughout lineage commitment (Sheffery et al., 1982). Mechanisms allowing for alterations in DHS therefore need to be in place. While the vast majority of transcription factors cannot bind regions of compacted chromatin, a few exceptions exist. For example, some transcription factors are preferentially associated with regions of heterochromatin (Thurman et al., 2012). Another

Epigenetic modifications as intermediates between pioneer factors and chromatin openness

Distinct epigenetic signatures defined by unique combinations of histone PTMs correlate with regulatory elements found away from gene promoters, namely enhancers (Heintzman et al., 2007, Heintzman et al., 2009, Lupien et al., 2008, Ernst and Kellis, 2010, Ernst et al., 2011). Some of these PTMs, including H3K4me1 and H3K4me2, are present on nucleosomes surrounding these enhancers regardless of whether they are poised or actively engaged in transcriptional regulation (Heintzman et al., 2007,

ESR1-mediated epigenetic changes and chromatin remodeling post-activation

The definition of epigenetics has evolved to include more than the non-genetic information that is inherited. It now commonly encompasses all the modifications to the chromatin that impact DNA-templated processes, such as DNA replication, transcription and DNA repair (Dawson and Kouzarides, 2012). While some epigenetic modifications are commonly found prior to ESR1 recruitment (e.g. H3K4me1/2 and H3K9me2) (Lupien et al., 2008), a number of PTMs, including acetylation, methylation and

Stimulus-specific deposition of epigenetic modifications define the active ESR1 binding sites

Several molecules other than estrogen, such as growth factors, genestein and bisphenol A, can activate ESR1. These induce a set of ESR1 binding sites that are partially distinct from estrogen-induced ESR1 binding (Lupien et al., 2010, Gertz et al., 2012). However, the majority of ESR1 bound sites are shared across the different sources of stimulation. This contrasts with the transcriptional response, which significantly differs following growth factors versus estrogen stimulation (Lupien et

The chromatin architecture and ESR1 signaling

ESR1 is preferentially recruited at regulatory elements distant from promoters of target genes upon estrogen stimulation (Carroll et al., 2005, Carroll et al., 2006, Lin et al., 2007, Welboren et al., 2009, Lupien et al., 2010, Gertz et al., 2012, Ross-Innes et al., 2012, Xiao et al., 2012). Such regulatory elements, namely enhancers, modulate target gene expression by either allowing for the recruitment of transcriptional complexes that transit to the promoter of the target gene (Wang et al.,

Genetic alterations disrupt chromatin factors and can impinge on ESR1 signaling

Genetic alterations, including mutations (germline or somatic) and genetic variants (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) or structural variants) can change the interplay between the chromatin and the transcriptional machinery. Genome re-sequencing studies have recently identified mutations in chromatin factors in various types of solid tumors (Rodríguez-Paredes and Esteller, 2011). Pioneer factors are significantly mutated in ESR1-positive breast cancers (Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012,

Concluding remarks

The intricate relationship between chromatin and transcriptional processes is gradually revealing itself. Far from being a passive template, the chromatin landscape, defined by epigenetic modifications and the state of chromatin compaction, can be regarded as a major regulator of transcriptional regulation of significance to disease development (Feng et al., 2010, Baylin and Jones, 2011, Akhtar-Zaidi et al., 2012, ENCODE Project Consortium et al., 2012). The study of nuclear receptors, such as

References (118)

  • T. Kouzarides

    Chromatin modifications and their function

    Cell

    (2007)
  • V. Kumar et al.

    The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer

    Cell

    (1988)
  • V. Kumar et al.

    Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor

    Cell

    (1987)
  • R.B. Lanz et al.

    A steroid receptor coactivator, SRA, functions as an RNA and is present in an SRC-1 complex

    Cell

    (1999)
  • G. Li et al.

    Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation

    Cell

    (2012)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Foxa2 and H2A.Z mediate nucleosome depletion during embryonic stem cell differentiation

    Cell

    (2012)
  • X.-F. Liu et al.

    Recruitment of distinct chromatin-modifying complexes by tamoxifen-complexed estrogen receptor at natural target gene promoters in vivo

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2004)
  • M. Lupien et al.

    FoxA1 translates epigenetic signatures into enhancer-driven lineage-specific transcription

    Cell

    (2008)
  • L. Magnani et al.

    Pioneer factors: directing transcriptional regulators within the chromatin environment

    Trends in Genetics: TIG

    (2011)
  • R. Métivier et al.

    Estrogen receptor-alpha directs ordered, cyclical, and combinatorial recruitment of cofactors on a natural target promoter

    Cell

    (2003)
  • R. Mo

    Identification of the MLL2 Complex as a Coactivator for Estrogen Receptor

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2006)
  • Y.F. Pan et al.

    Regulation of estrogen receptor-mediated long range transcription via evolutionarily conserved distal response elements

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2008)
  • G. Reid et al.

    Cyclic, proteasome-mediated turnover of unliganded and liganded ERalpha on responsive promoters is an integral feature of estrogen signaling

    Molecular Cell

    (2003)
  • J.-M. Renoir

    Estradiol receptors in breast cancer cells: associated co-factors as targets for new therapeutic approaches

    Steroids

    (2012)
  • L. Salmena et al.

    A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language?

    Cell

    (2011)
  • Y. Shang et al.

    Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency in estrogen receptor-regulated transcription

    Cell

    (2000)
  • Y. Shi et al.

    Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1

    Cell

    (2004)
  • S.T. Smale

    Pioneer factors in embryonic stem cells and differentiation

    Current Opinion in Genetics & Development

    (2010)
  • B.C. Smith et al.

    Chemical mechanisms of histone lysine and arginine modifications

    Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta

    (2009)
  • B. Akhtar-Zaidi et al.

    Epigenomic enhancer profiling defines a signature of colon cancer

    Science (New York, NY)

    (2012)
  • M. Al-Dhaheri et al.

    CARM1 is an important determinant of ERα-dependent breast cancer cell differentiation and proliferation in breast cancer cells

    Cancer Research

    (2011)
  • D.H. Barnett et al.

    Estrogen receptor regulation of carbonic anhydrase XII through a distal enhancer in breast cancer

    Cancer Research

    (2008)
  • S.B. Baylin et al.

    A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome – biological and translational implications

    Nature Reviews Cancer

    (2011)
  • O. Bell et al.

    Determinants and dynamics of genome accessibility

    Nature Reviews Genetics

    (2011)
  • Y. Bilu et al.

    The design of transcription-factor binding sites is affected by combinatorial regulation

    Genome Biology

    (2005)
  • R. Bonneville et al.

    A hidden Markov model to identify combinatorial epigenetic regulation patterns for estrogen receptor α target genes

    Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)

    (2012)
  • V. Bourdeau

    Genome-wide identification of high-affinity estrogen response elements in human and mouse

    Molecular Endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)

    (2004)
  • Cancer Genome Atlas Network

    Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Nature

    (2012)
  • J.S. Carroll et al.

    Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites

    Nature Genetics

    (2006)
  • F.F. Costa

    Non-coding RNAs: Meet thy masters

    BioEssays

    (2010)
  • R. Cowper-Sal Lari et al.

    Breast cancer risk-associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression

    Nature Genetics

    (2012)
  • J. DiRenzo et al.

    BRG-1 is recruited to estrogen-responsive promoters and cooperates with factors involved in histone acetylation

    Molecular and Cellular Biology

    (2000)
  • J. Eeckhoute et al.

    Positive cross-regulatory loop ties GATA-3 to estrogen receptor alpha expression in breast cancer

    Cancer Research

    (2007)
  • J. Eeckhoute et al.

    Cell-type selective chromatin remodeling defines the active subset of FOXA1-bound enhancers

    Genome Research

    (2009)
  • M.J. Ellis et al.

    Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition

    Nature

    (2012)
  • ENCODE Project Consortium et al.

    An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Nature

    (2012)
  • J. Ernst et al.

    Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome

    Nature Biotechnology

    (2010)
  • J. Ernst et al.

    Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types

    Nature

    (2011)
  • S. Feng et al.

    Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development

    Science (New York, NY)

    (2010)
  • C.E. Foulds et al.

    Research resource: expression profiling reveals unexpected targets and functions of the human steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA) gene

    Molecular Endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)

    (2010)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Sex hormone fluctuation and increased female risk for depression and anxiety disorders: From clinical evidence to molecular mechanisms

      2022, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, there is also evidence of an interaction of estrogen’s non-genomic and genomic mechanisms (Vasudevan and Pfaff, 2008). While estrogen mainly acts by changing gene expression, which typically involves epigenetic mechanisms such as chromatin remodeling (Magnani and Lupien, 2014), these mechanisms have been largely described in cancer cell lines, and remained poorly understood in the brain until recently. We and others have demonstrated significant gene expression changes across the estrous cycle in the hippocampus (DiCarlo et al., 2017; Iqbal et al., 2020; Jaric et al., 2019b), the PFC (Duclot and Kabbaj, 2015), and the hypothalamus (Vastagh and Liposits, 2017).

    • The functional genome: epigenetics and epigenomics

      2022, Genomic and Precision Medicine: Oncology, Third Edition
    • The prevalence of estrogen receptor-1 mutation in advanced breast cancer: The estrogen receptor one study (EROS1)

      2019, Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Estrogen-ER complex will activate the receptor and induce conformational changes, allowing the complex to bind to particular DNA sequences. Meanwhile, co-repressors and co-activators could influence the process of gene transcription [13]. Therefore, anti-estrogens act primarily to block ER or deplete endogenous estrogen preventing ER activation and tumor growth.

    • The Functional Genome: Epigenetics and Epigenomics

      2017, Genomic and Precision Medicine: Foundations, Translation, and Implementation: Third Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Division of Cancer, Cancer Research Centre, Imperial College, London, UK.

    View full text