Point of viewNew definition of sepsis and septic shock: What does it give us?Nueva definición de sepsis y shock séptico: ¿qué nos ofrece?
Section snippets
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References (12)
- et al.
The third International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)
JAMA
(2016) - et al.
Mortality related to Zealand, 2000–2012
JAMA
(2014) - et al.
American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis
Crit Care Med
(1992) - et al.
The natural history of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)
JAMA
(1995) - et al.
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome score at admission independently predicts mortality and length of stay in trauma patients
J Trauma
(2000) - et al.
Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in surgical patients
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (10)
Optimizing artificial intelligence in sepsis management: Opportunities in the present and looking closely to the future
2024, Journal of Intensive MedicineSepsis-3: More specific is better?
2019, Medicina ClinicaLife-support tools for improving performance of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Hour-1 bundle
2018, Medicina IntensivaBlood stream infection in an intensive care unit, a comparative study on the impact of infection control trained versus untrained nursing staff
2021, Microbes and Infectious DiseasesDeveloping machine-learning prediction algorithm for bacteremia in admitted patients
2021, Infection and Drug Resistance
© 2016 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.