Elsevier

Metabolism

Volume 63, Issue 9, September 2014, Pages 1115-1124
Metabolism

Clinical Science
Effects of 12 weeks high dose vitamin D3 treatment on insulin sensitivity, beta cell function, and metabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and vitamin D insufficiency – a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2014.06.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

Vitamin D insufficiency is common in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Observational studies suggest that vitamin D plays a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. However, results of intervention studies have been inconsistent. We investigated the effects of improving vitamin D status on insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials/methods

A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial was conducted. Sixteen patients with type 2 diabetes and hypovitaminosis D were recruited. Eight patients received colecalciferol and (280 μg daily for 2 weeks, 140 μg daily for 10 weeks) and 8 patients received identical placebo tablets for 12 weeks. Before and after intervention, patients underwent IVGTT, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, assessment of baseline high-frequency insulin pulsatility, glucose-entrained insulin pulsatility, DXA scans, 24-hour-ambulatory blood pressure monitorings, and fasting blood samples.

Results

Serum-25(OH) vitamin D and serum-1,25(OH)2 vitamin D increased significantly after 12 weeks in the intervention group (p = 0.01, p = 0.004). Serum-25(OH) vitamin D was also significantly higher in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.02) after intervention. Although no significant changes in insulin sensitivity, inflammation, blood pressure, lipid profile, or HbA1c were found, we observed borderline (p between 0.05 and 0.10) improvements of insulin secretion, in terms of c-peptide levels, first phase incremental AUC insulin and insulin secretory burst mass.

Conclusions

Improvement in vitamin D status does not improve insulin resistance, blood pressure, inflammation or HbA1c, but might increase insulin secretion in patients with established type 2 diabetes.

Introduction

Vitamin D deficiency is a worldwide health problem and the finding that most organs and immune cells in the body have vitamin D receptors has provided new insights into the non-skeletal effects of vitamin D [1]. A relationship between lack of vitamin D and development of type 1 diabetes has been reported [2], [3], [4] and several observational studies suggest a role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. In the Nurse's Health Study low vitamin D intakes were associated with a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes [5] and serum 25OHD concentrations were inversely related to the prevalence of diabetes in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994) [6] as well as to insulin resistance in a smaller cross sectional study [7]. In a 10-year prospective study an inverse association between baseline serum 25OHD and future glycemia and insulin resistance was found [8]. Despite supporting evidence from abundant observational studies the results of intervention studies with vitamin D on glucose metabolism and other components of the metabolic syndrome have been inconsistent [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. The available trials are conducted in different settings with differences in subject populations, length of intervention and forms of vitamin D supplementation. In addition, most studies have used indirect measures of insulin secretion and sensitivity (HOMA) and are unable to show relevant increase in serum 25OHD [19], [23]. Most studies regarding the potential effects of vitamin D on glucose metabolism have examined normal subjects or subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Whether vitamin D has an impact on metabolic control and complications in patients with established diabetes has not been well addressed. It is however an area of great importance as many individuals with diabetes are vitamin D insufficient [6], [23].

Also only limited and conflicting data exist concerning the relationship between vitamin D status and systemic inflammation in type 2 diabetes [5], [12], [24].

This study was designed to investigate the effects of improved vitamin D status on insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and on inflammatory markers in vitamin D insufficient patients with type 2 diabetes. As vitamin D status has been associated with plasma lipid concentrations, blood pressure [19], [22], [25], and bone mineral density (BMD) [26] these variables were also measured.

Section snippets

Methods

The study design was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Danish participants aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited from a primary care and a secondary care diabetes clinic. Exclusion criteria were as follows: Serum 25OHD level ≥ 50 nmol/L; serum urea > 12 mmol/L; serum total calcium > 2.52 mmol/L, a history of coronary infarction, sarcoidosis, malabsorption, primary hyperparathyroidism or malignancy. Women, who were pregnant, lactating or not

Results

One hundred and ninety-two patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited and screened for vitamin D insufficiency (25OHD ≤ 50 nmol/L). Thirty-two subjects qualified for participation and of those 16 accepted to be enrolled in the intervention trial. One patient in the vitamin D group was excluded shortly after inclusion due to renal insufficiency. It was not possible to include another subject as the intervention period was restricted to December, January, February, and March. Baseline

Discussion

Our findings indicate that increasing serum 25OHD levels from around 31 to 104 nmol/L over a 12 week period does not improve insulin sensitivity, glycemic control, inflammatory parameters, or blood pressure in patients with established type 2 diabetes. There are however indications that vitamin D supplementation might have an effect on insulin secretion as we found a significant increase in incremental AUC of insulin and a trend toward an increase in c-peptide in the vitamin D supplemented group

Author contributions

U. K. collected, analyzed and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. L.M. designed the study, interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. C.J. analyzed and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. N.M. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. B.C. collected and analyzed data. L. R. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript L.W. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. L.O. designed the study, collected and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by funding from the FOOD Study Group/Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries and Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs, Denmark, “Fonden af 17-12-1981”, “Den Sundhedsvidenskabelige Forskningsfond, Region Midtjylland” and “Hospitalsenheden Silkeborg Forskningspulje”.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

We owe great thanks to Marijke Vocks for performing the DXA scans and the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Medical laboratory technicians A Mengel and L Buus are thanked for excellent technical assistance and we are grateful to H Kampmann for her effort in recruiting the patients.

References (49)

  • L.C. Stene et al.

    Use of cod liver oil during pregnancy associated with lower risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring

    Diabetologia

    (2000)
  • A.G. Pittas et al.

    Vitamin D and calcium intake in relation to type 2 diabetes in women

    Diabetes Care

    (2006)
  • R. Scragg et al.

    Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, diabetes, and ethnicity in the third national health and nutrition examination survey

    Diabetes Care

    (2004)
  • N.G. Forouhi et al.

    Baseline serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D is predictive of future glycemic status and insulin resistance: the Medical Research Council Ely Prospective Study 1990–2000

    Diabetes

    (2008)
  • O. Gedik et al.

    Effects of vitamin D deficiency and repletion on insulin and glucagon secretion in man

    Diabetologia

    (1986)
  • L. Lind et al.

    Long-term treatment with active vitamin D (alphacalcidol) in middle-aged men with impaired glucose tolerance. Effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity, glucose tolerance and blood pressure

    Diabetes Res

    (1989)
  • A.M. Borrisova et al.

    The effect of vitamin D3 on insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients

    Int J Clin Pract

    (2003)
  • A.G. Pittas et al.

    The effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose and markers and inflammation in nondiabetic adults

    Diabetes Care

    (2007)
  • J. Nagpal et al.

    A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the short term effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on insulin sensitivity in apparently healthy, middle-aged, centrally obese men

    Diabet Med

    (2009)
  • P. Von Hurst et al.

    Vitamin D supplementation reduces insulin resistance in South Asian women living in New Zealand who are insulin resistant and vitamin D deficient – a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

    Br J Nutr

    (2009)
  • C. Luo et al.

    Hypovitaminosis D in Chinese type 2 diabetes: lack of impact on clinical metabolic status and biomarkers of cellular inflammation

    Diab Vasc Dis Res

    (2009)
  • R. Jorde et al.

    Supplementation with cholecalciferol does not improve glycemic control in diabetic subjects with normal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels

    Eur J Nutr

    (2009)
  • G. Grimnes et al.

    Vitamin D, insulin secretion, sensitivity, and lipids

    Diabetes

    (2011)
  • A.G. Pittas et al.

    Vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review

    Ann Intern Med

    (2010)
  • Cited by (114)

    • The role of vitamin D in type 2 diabetes

      2023, Feldman and Pike's Vitamin D: Volume Two: Disease and Therapeutics
    • The effects of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with abnormal glucose homeostasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      2021, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      General characteristics of these articles are summarized in Supplementary Table 4. All trials were randomized controlled parallel trials which were conducted in the USA [17,28,49,58], Finland [54], Denmark [39], Korea [45], Norway [50], Israel [31], UAE [46], Italy [30], Iran [15,27,32,34,35,37,38,40,42,43,47,48,52,53,56,57,59,60], Singapore [33], UK [16,36], Malaysia [61], India [51], Ireland [41], News Zealand [55], Saudi Arabia [29] and Lebanon [14]. These studies were published between 2010 and 2020.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicting or financial interests: Nothing to declare.

    ☆☆

    Clinical Trial Registration Number: ID: NCT00812578.

    View full text