Key messages
- •
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy is feasible in place of BPCT and has a low complication rate.
- •
Ultrasound provides a better understanding of the anatomy of the neck, prevents vascular puncture, and helps guide the
Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) is a commonly performed bedside procedure in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Several studies have demonstrated that PCT is a safe and cost-effective alternative to open, surgical tracheostomy.1, 2, 3 Bronchoscopic guidance during PT may be useful in avoiding injury to surrounding structures, high placement of the tube, injury to the posterior tracheal wall and in confirming endotracheal placement.4, 5 However, bronchoscopy does not identify the vascular structures or the thyroid gland in the neck region and thus does not prevent complications linked to local organ lesions (punctured vessels or a punctured thyroid) and in patients with acute brain injury, it can cause acute elevations in intracranial pressure.
Preliminary reports suggest that sonographic delineation of anatomy prior to tracheal puncture during PT may help prevent bleeding from pre-tracheal vascular structures and placement of the tracheal tube above the first tracheal ring.6, 7 The use of real-time ultrasonography, with actual visualization of the needle path up to the anterior tracheal wall should further decrease the risk of puncture above the first tracheal ring as well as the risk of injury to surrounding structures and the posterior tracheal wall. Real-time guidance during PT may be particularly useful when factors that increase the technical difficulty of the procedure (morbid obesity, difficult anatomy, cervical spine precautions) are present. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no published data comparing the US guided and bronchoscopic guided percutaneous tracheostomy. Hence, the objectives of our study were to compare the efficacy of these two methods and to evaluate the incidence of complications in intensive care units.
This study was a prospective, single centre randomised control trial (RCT) study of 74 consecutive patients. All patients (or, for unconscious patients, the next of kin) gave their written informed consent to participation. We enrolled all patients who were hospitalized in the ICU and HDU on whom PCT was indicated. Exclusion criteria were as follows: age under 18 years, coagulation disorders (platelet count of below 80,000 mm−3 and an international normalized ratio of at least 1.5), and
Seventy four patients were prospectively enrolled between March 2012 and December 2013. Twenty-six patients were obese -median BMI of 34 kg/m2 (32–38) – and five of the latter were morbidly obese. The median ages were 58 years (50–66) (mean 61 yrs, 1.2SD) in the (Bronchoscopic assisted Percutaneous Tracheostomy (BPCT)) group and 62 years (56–64) (mean 58 yrs, 1.6SD) in the Ultrasound assisted percutaneous tracheostomy (USPCT) group (P = 0.62) (Table 2). Of the 74 patients, 60 patients (81%) had
Our results demonstrate that PCT can be performed under real-time US guidance as efficacious if not with better results in comparison bronchoscopic guided PCT and with a short completion time. Several studies have emphasized the value of pre-PCT US examination of the neck region to reduce the incidence of complications.9 Recently, Rajajee et al demonstrated the feasibility of US guidance during the implementation of PCT in a population of neuro-intensive care patients.10 USPCT has many
US-guided PCT can be performed in safely in critically ill patients, and the incidence of complications is low. Use of US provides a better understanding of the anatomy of the neck, prevents vascular puncture, and helps guide the tracheostomy procedure.
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy is feasible in place of BPCT and has a low complication rate. Ultrasound provides a better understanding of the anatomy of the neck, prevents vascular puncture, and helps guide theKey messages
All authors have none to declare.
The success of the procedure at the first attempt is significantly greater with Doppler ultrasound: 94.9% (168/177) versus 90.4% (160/177). There is, however, great heterogeneity between these studies, as the randomization procedure is not always well described [70,71] and the definition of complications is not uniform; the strength of the recommendation (2 + ) is related to the as-yet infrequent use of ultrasound with tracheotomy and to the quality of the randomized trials;
Available online 12 March 2015