ReviewThe role of the cerebral cortex in postural responses to externally induced perturbations
Introduction
A broadly distributed neural network controls upright stability in humans. While the relative contribution of distinct parts of the nervous system to maintain balance remains unclear it is now well established that even the most advanced regions of the neural hierarchy play some role in balance control. Most remarkable is the accumulating evidence that the cerebral cortex plays an important role in balance including compensatory reactions to unexpected postural challenge. This represents an important departure from the historical framework that placed postural regulation largely in the domain of subcortical networks.
A seemingly effortless ability to stay upright in healthy humans belies the sophisticated mechanisms acting to preserve an elevated centre of mass over a small bipedal base of support. However in many disease states, particularly those involving neurological disruption, the challenge of this task is exposed rendering numerous clinical populations vulnerable to falls. With significant societal and individual costs related to falls (e.g. severe injury and even death) this represents a major health care concern (Baker et al., 2011, Carroll et al., 2005, Kannus et al., 2005). Thus illuminating the underlying neural mechanisms for controlling balance is essential for developing targeted therapies to mitigate fall risk. As expected, considerable effort has gone into exploring factors that impact balance such as the role of different sensory cues in triggering corrective actions (Bolton and Misiaszek, 2009, Macpherson et al., 2007, Stapley et al., 2002) or spinal and brainstem mechanisms acting to stabilize the body (Bolton and Misiaszek, 2012, Honeycutt and Nichols, 2010, Macpherson and Fung, 1999, Mori, 1987). Conversely, much less research has investigated the role of the cerebral cortex in balance. This gap has likely been encouraged by the long-held belief that postural responses are mostly managed sub cortically (Magnus, 1926, Sherrington, 1910). Of course, this view has been reasonable given that reduced animal preparations retain an impressive capacity for generating complex righting reactions (Honeycutt and Nichols, 2010). Moreover, the comparably slow pace of sensory-cued voluntary acts versus the onset of automated postural responses has influenced the assumption that much of the neural processing related to generating balance reactions originates sub-cortically. While subcortical networks are critical in generating compensatory behaviour more recent investigations have demonstrated that the cerebral cortex makes a meaningful contribution to compensatory balance reactions.
The major shift towards recognising an important role for the cerebral cortex in balance control has been discussed previously (Jacobs and Horak, 2007, Maki and McIlroy, 2007) and the reader is referred to these comprehensive reviews. A critical distillation of these past reviews is that the cerebral cortex can: (1) Modulate upcoming potential postural responses via central set based on intention and knowledge of perturbation or environmental characteristics, (2) provide online monitoring of balance status and (3) modulate late-phase or change-in-support responses characteristics perhaps through direct control.
The present review extends upon past work to highlight some of the more recent advances. This includes updated information regarding cortical contributions to the perception (and prediction) of instability as well as a role in shaping the motor response. Where possible an indication of the impact of particular brain regions in responding to external perturbations will be provided. Moreover, compelling evidence now exists that postural threat is associated with accelerated engagement of cortical networks thus challenging previously assumed speed of transmission barriers to why the cerebral cortex could not play a role in rapid postural responses. This review will present the emerging evidence for a cortical role in reactive balance emphasizing research that directly measures cortical neurophysiology in association with externally induced postural responses. Moreover, suggestions for future research are provided. Overall, an updated framework is advanced for how the cerebral cortex may influence both the online generation of compensatory reactions as well as contributing to a priori setting of the central nervous system (CNS) state to influence such control.
Section snippets
What is a compensatory reaction?
Compensatory balance responses are highly sophisticated, whole-body reactions rapidly generated by the nervous system to resist a loss of equilibrium. The initial triggered stage of the response, the automatic postural reaction (APR), is intimately linked to the sensory volley from a fall, evident by the direction specificity of the resultant muscle pattern and the fact that the motor response scales with the perturbation magnitude (Macpherson and Horak, 2013). These postural responses are
Indirect support for a cortical role in postural responses to externally induced perturbations
From earlier reviews on this topic (Jacobs and Horak, 2007, Maki and McIlroy, 2007) several lines of evidence offered indirect support for the cortical contribution to postural recovery. Namely, past research demonstrated that when the cerebral cortex is either damaged or preoccupied with a cognitively demanding task postural performance is disrupted. A summation of this work is that compensatory behaviour ultimately demands the participation of cortical networks. More recent findings provide
Direct measures of cortical neurophysiology related to externally induced postural responses
The most direct evidence of potential cortical involvement comes from recording neural activity temporally coupled to induced instability and the onset of compensatory balance reactions. This has been shown in animal studies using direct recording from cortical neurons (Beloozerova et al., 2003b, Beloozerova et al., 2005) and in human studies using brain imaging techniques such as EEG (Adkin et al., 2006, Jacobs et al., 2008, Marlin et al., 2014, Mochizuki et al., 2008, Mochizuki et al., 2009,
Evidence for accelerated speed of processing
A major barrier to recognizing a cortical role in compensatory balance has been the temporal disparity between volitional versus compensatory movement onsets. Certainly a cortical contribution to postural reactions would not be consistent with processing delays associated with typical voluntary reactions. Yet from the chair-tilt studies just described one can see that when movements were triggered by the perturbation, muscle onsets were greatly accelerated while still traversing a motor
Potential roles for the cerebral cortex in balance: Future directions
While there is a growing appreciation for a cortical contribution to balance control in humans a pronounced gap remains in understanding exactly how this works. Certainly, cortical mechanisms serving balance have not been explored with the same meticulousness as subcortical righting mechanisms. This is likely due to the comparably recent recognition of a significant cortical contribution to balance control but also the greater difficulty in directly exploring this role. For example a typical
Conclusion
Balance is managed through a distributed neural network and there is now appreciation for a meaningful role of the cerebral cortex within this network. Certainly, the cerebral cortex does not act in isolation when influencing postural recovery but relies heavily on interactions with cortico-basal ganglia and cortico-cerebellar loops (Jacobs and Horak, 2007) in addition to the earlier mentioned spinal and brainstem righting mechanisms. The increasing volume of studies that link cognitive
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank W. E. McIlroy for his insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
References (127)
- et al.
The influence of postural threat on the cortical response to unpredictable and predictable postural perturbations
Neurosci. Lett.
(2008) - et al.
Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature
Maturitas
(2013) - et al.
The effect of response type (motor output versus mental counting) on the intracerebral distribution of the slow cortical potentials in an externally cued (CNV) paradigm
Brain Res. Bull.
(2007) - et al.
Transient inhibition of primary motor cortex suppresses hand muscle responses during a reactive reach to grasp
Neurosci. Lett.
(2011) Visual and auditory evoked phase resetting of the alpha EEG
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
(1997)- et al.
Effects of spatial-memory decay and dual-task interference on perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions in the absence of online visual feedback
Hum. Mov. Sci.
(2013) - et al.
Cerebral evoked potentials associated with the compensatory reactions following stance and gait perturbation
Neurosci. Lett.
(1984) - et al.
Stance perturbation-evoked potentials in old people with poor gait and balance
Clin. Neurophysiol.
(1999) - et al.
Cortical changes underlying balance recovery in patients with hemiplegic stroke
Neuroimage
(2014) - et al.
A review of standing balance recovery from stroke
Gait Posture
(2005)