Review
The role of the cerebral cortex in postural responses to externally induced perturbations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Rapid balance recovery responses are influenced by the cerebral cortex.

  • Due to arousal, cortical processes can be hastened to contribute to the response.

  • The cortex appears to covertly set the nervous system in advance to avoid falls.

  • Effective balance responses in complex environments require cortical contributions.

Abstract

The ease with which we avoid falling down belies a highly sophisticated and distributed neural network for controlling reactions to maintain upright balance. Although historically these reactions were considered within the sub cortical domain, mounting evidence reveals a distributed network for postural control including a potentially important role for the cerebral cortex. Support for this cortical role comes from direct measurement associated with moments of induced instability as well as indirect links between cognitive task performance and balance recovery. The cerebral cortex appears to be directly involved in the control of rapid balance reactions but also setting the central nervous system in advance to optimize balance recovery reactions even when a future threat to stability is unexpected. In this review the growing body of evidence that now firmly supports a cortical role in the postural responses to externally induced perturbations is presented. Moreover, an updated framework is advanced to help understand how cortical contributions may influence our resistance to falls and on what timescale. The implications for future studies into the neural control of balance are discussed.

Introduction

A broadly distributed neural network controls upright stability in humans. While the relative contribution of distinct parts of the nervous system to maintain balance remains unclear it is now well established that even the most advanced regions of the neural hierarchy play some role in balance control. Most remarkable is the accumulating evidence that the cerebral cortex plays an important role in balance including compensatory reactions to unexpected postural challenge. This represents an important departure from the historical framework that placed postural regulation largely in the domain of subcortical networks.

A seemingly effortless ability to stay upright in healthy humans belies the sophisticated mechanisms acting to preserve an elevated centre of mass over a small bipedal base of support. However in many disease states, particularly those involving neurological disruption, the challenge of this task is exposed rendering numerous clinical populations vulnerable to falls. With significant societal and individual costs related to falls (e.g. severe injury and even death) this represents a major health care concern (Baker et al., 2011, Carroll et al., 2005, Kannus et al., 2005). Thus illuminating the underlying neural mechanisms for controlling balance is essential for developing targeted therapies to mitigate fall risk. As expected, considerable effort has gone into exploring factors that impact balance such as the role of different sensory cues in triggering corrective actions (Bolton and Misiaszek, 2009, Macpherson et al., 2007, Stapley et al., 2002) or spinal and brainstem mechanisms acting to stabilize the body (Bolton and Misiaszek, 2012, Honeycutt and Nichols, 2010, Macpherson and Fung, 1999, Mori, 1987). Conversely, much less research has investigated the role of the cerebral cortex in balance. This gap has likely been encouraged by the long-held belief that postural responses are mostly managed sub cortically (Magnus, 1926, Sherrington, 1910). Of course, this view has been reasonable given that reduced animal preparations retain an impressive capacity for generating complex righting reactions (Honeycutt and Nichols, 2010). Moreover, the comparably slow pace of sensory-cued voluntary acts versus the onset of automated postural responses has influenced the assumption that much of the neural processing related to generating balance reactions originates sub-cortically. While subcortical networks are critical in generating compensatory behaviour more recent investigations have demonstrated that the cerebral cortex makes a meaningful contribution to compensatory balance reactions.

The major shift towards recognising an important role for the cerebral cortex in balance control has been discussed previously (Jacobs and Horak, 2007, Maki and McIlroy, 2007) and the reader is referred to these comprehensive reviews. A critical distillation of these past reviews is that the cerebral cortex can: (1) Modulate upcoming potential postural responses via central set based on intention and knowledge of perturbation or environmental characteristics, (2) provide online monitoring of balance status and (3) modulate late-phase or change-in-support responses characteristics perhaps through direct control.

The present review extends upon past work to highlight some of the more recent advances. This includes updated information regarding cortical contributions to the perception (and prediction) of instability as well as a role in shaping the motor response. Where possible an indication of the impact of particular brain regions in responding to external perturbations will be provided. Moreover, compelling evidence now exists that postural threat is associated with accelerated engagement of cortical networks thus challenging previously assumed speed of transmission barriers to why the cerebral cortex could not play a role in rapid postural responses. This review will present the emerging evidence for a cortical role in reactive balance emphasizing research that directly measures cortical neurophysiology in association with externally induced postural responses. Moreover, suggestions for future research are provided. Overall, an updated framework is advanced for how the cerebral cortex may influence both the online generation of compensatory reactions as well as contributing to a priori setting of the central nervous system (CNS) state to influence such control.

Section snippets

What is a compensatory reaction?

Compensatory balance responses are highly sophisticated, whole-body reactions rapidly generated by the nervous system to resist a loss of equilibrium. The initial triggered stage of the response, the automatic postural reaction (APR), is intimately linked to the sensory volley from a fall, evident by the direction specificity of the resultant muscle pattern and the fact that the motor response scales with the perturbation magnitude (Macpherson and Horak, 2013). These postural responses are

Indirect support for a cortical role in postural responses to externally induced perturbations

From earlier reviews on this topic (Jacobs and Horak, 2007, Maki and McIlroy, 2007) several lines of evidence offered indirect support for the cortical contribution to postural recovery. Namely, past research demonstrated that when the cerebral cortex is either damaged or preoccupied with a cognitively demanding task postural performance is disrupted. A summation of this work is that compensatory behaviour ultimately demands the participation of cortical networks. More recent findings provide

Direct measures of cortical neurophysiology related to externally induced postural responses

The most direct evidence of potential cortical involvement comes from recording neural activity temporally coupled to induced instability and the onset of compensatory balance reactions. This has been shown in animal studies using direct recording from cortical neurons (Beloozerova et al., 2003b, Beloozerova et al., 2005) and in human studies using brain imaging techniques such as EEG (Adkin et al., 2006, Jacobs et al., 2008, Marlin et al., 2014, Mochizuki et al., 2008, Mochizuki et al., 2009,

Evidence for accelerated speed of processing

A major barrier to recognizing a cortical role in compensatory balance has been the temporal disparity between volitional versus compensatory movement onsets. Certainly a cortical contribution to postural reactions would not be consistent with processing delays associated with typical voluntary reactions. Yet from the chair-tilt studies just described one can see that when movements were triggered by the perturbation, muscle onsets were greatly accelerated while still traversing a motor

Potential roles for the cerebral cortex in balance: Future directions

While there is a growing appreciation for a cortical contribution to balance control in humans a pronounced gap remains in understanding exactly how this works. Certainly, cortical mechanisms serving balance have not been explored with the same meticulousness as subcortical righting mechanisms. This is likely due to the comparably recent recognition of a significant cortical contribution to balance control but also the greater difficulty in directly exploring this role. For example a typical

Conclusion

Balance is managed through a distributed neural network and there is now appreciation for a meaningful role of the cerebral cortex within this network. Certainly, the cerebral cortex does not act in isolation when influencing postural recovery but relies heavily on interactions with cortico-basal ganglia and cortico-cerebellar loops (Jacobs and Horak, 2007) in addition to the earlier mentioned spinal and brainstem righting mechanisms. The increasing volume of studies that link cognitive

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank W. E. McIlroy for his insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

References (127)

  • T. Hamano et al.

    The cortical generators of the contingent negative variation in humans: a study with subdural electrodes

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1997)
  • C.B. Holroyd et al.

    Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1998)
  • J.V. Jacobs et al.

    Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2008)
  • B.H. Jansen et al.

    Phase synchronization of the ongoing EEG and auditory EP generation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • P. Kannus et al.

    Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • E.C. King et al.

    Does the “eyes lead the hand” principle apply to reach-to-grasp movements evoked by unexpected balance perturbations?

    Hum. Mov. Sci.

    (2011)
  • B. Lakhani et al.

    Does the movement matter?: Determinants of the latency of temporally urgent motor reactions

    Brain Res.

    (2011)
  • M. Lamarche et al.

    Intracerebral recordings of slow potentials in a contingent negative variation paradigm: an exploration in epileptic patients

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1995)
  • P. Luu et al.

    Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2004)
  • B.E. Maki et al.

    Preventing falls in older adults: new interventions to promote more effective change-in-support balance reactions

    J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.

    (2008)
  • A. Mansfield et al.

    Determinants of limb preference for initiating compensatory stepping poststroke

    Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.

    (2012)
  • A.W. McCollough et al.

    Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory

    Cortex

    (2007)
  • W.E. McIlroy et al.

    Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1995)
  • W.E. McIlroy et al.

    Changes in early ‘automatic’ postural responses associated with the prior-planning and execution of a compensatory step

    Brain Res.

    (1993)
  • M. Mihara et al.

    Role of the prefrontal cortex in human balance control

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • W.H. Miltner et al.

    Implementation of error-processing in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a source analysis of the magnetic equivalent of the error-related negativity

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • G. Mochizuki et al.

    Perturbation-evoked cortical activity reflects both the context and consequence of postural instability

    Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • G. Mochizuki et al.

    Generalizability of perturbation-evoked cortical potentials: independence from sensory, motor and overall postural state

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2009)
  • G. Mochizuki et al.

    Cortical responses associated with the preparation and reaction to full-body perturbations to upright stability

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2008)
  • S. Mori

    Integration of posture and locomotion in acute decerebrate cats and in awake, freely moving cats

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1987)
  • M. Pijnappels et al.

    Tripping without falling; lower limb strength, a limitation for balance recovery and a target for training in the elderly

    J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.

    (2008)
  • A.L. Adkin et al.

    Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2006)
  • L. Alibiglou et al.

    The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex

    J. Physiol.

    (2012)
  • N.L. Baker et al.

    Hip fracture risk and subsequent mortality among Alzheimer's disease patients in the United Kingdom, 1988–2007

    Age Ageing

    (2011)
  • I.N. Beloozerova et al.

    Activity of pyramidal tract neurons in the cat during postural corrections

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2005)
  • I.N. Beloozerova et al.

    Activity of different classes of neurons of the motor cortex during postural corrections

    J. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • I.N. Beloozerova et al.

    Postural control in the rabbit maintaining balance on the tilting platform

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • D.A. Bolton et al.

    Effects of ankle extensor muscle afferent inputs on hip abductor and adductor activity in the decerebrate walking cat

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2012)
  • D.A. Bolton et al.

    Contribution of hindpaw cutaneous inputs to the control of lateral stability during walking in the cat

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2009)
  • D.A. Bolton et al.

    Contribution of primary motor cortex to compensatory balance reactions

    BMC Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • A. Burleigh et al.

    Influence of instruction, prediction, and afferent sensory information on the postural organization of step initiation

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1996)
  • A. Carlsen et al.

    Prepared movements are elicited early by startle

    J. Mot. Behav.

    (2004)
  • N.V. Carroll et al.

    The cost of falls among the community-dwelling elderly

    J. Manage. Care Pharm.

    (2005)
  • C.S. Carter et al.

    Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance

    Science

    (1998)
  • T.Y. Chen et al.

    Cognitive function as a prospective predictor of falls

    J. Gerontol. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.

    (2012)
  • V. Dietz et al.

    Cerebral potentials and leg muscle e.m.g. responses associated with stance perturbation

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • J.J. Eng et al.

    Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • M. Franca et al.

    Corticospinal facilitation during observation of graspable objects: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • W.H. Gage et al.

    Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2007)
  • J.J. Gibson

    The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

    (1979)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text