Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 22, Issue 2, June 2004, Pages 530-540
NeuroImage

Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.034Get rights and content

Abstract

The interplay of “top-down” and “bottom-up” regulated mechanisms is of particular relevance for the rapid (re-)focusing of attention to environmental changes. The purpose of the study was to explore the differential contributions of frontoparietal attentional networks involved in top-down and stimulus-driven processing to the detection of “target” and “distractor” events in a visual three-stimulus oddball paradigm. Thirteen healthy subjects underwent separate event-related potential (ERP) and whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements during the oddball task. The targets, which were difficult to detect, elicited a classical posterior P3b whereas the distractor stimuli were followed by a centro-frontal P3a ERP. The fMRI data showed activation of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) bilaterally and right prefrontal cortex associated with both the target and distractor conditions. This network has previously been described as an attentional system that is predominantly stimulus driven and that responds to rare events. Furthermore, target processing produced bilateral perisylvian activity, which has been related to the “retrieval mode”. Processing of the distractors activated the frontal eye fields (FEFs) and bilateral superior parietal cortex, areas engaged in attention switching and voluntary allocation of attention. Additional left prefrontal activation suggested an involvement of the cortical system for working memory encoding. Our results thus demonstrate that distractor and target processing engage a common neuronal system for the detection of rare events, but also task-specific subsystems related to attention and memory processes.

Section snippets

Subjects

Thirteen right-handed subjects (six females and seven male: mean age, 29; SD, 6.53 years; age range, 19–42) were recruited from an academic environment. All subjects were free from neurological and psychiatric disorders and gave informed consent to participation in the study. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Study design (stimuli and procedure)

A three-stimulus oddball paradigm was tested separately in EEG and fMRI sessions. A session included two different task types (circle task and square task) that differed

Behavioral data

Table 2 summarizes the behavioral results. The descriptive statistic indicated that the mean hit rates, response times, and the error rates were satisfactory and comparable to the results of the visual “difficult” condition of Comerchero and Polich (1999). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the EEG and fMRI sessions in the behavioral data. To test this, we performed repeated measurement t tests of mean response time, hit rate, and error rate based on an a priori alpha

Discussion

The main goal of this study was to distinguish the neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive processes that are shared by target and distractor detection from those that are specific to one of the tasks. The same subjects underwent EEG and fMRI measurements while performing an identical oddball task. The behavioral data showed that the rate of successfully recognized targets was nearly identical during EEG and fMRI measurements, indicating that (a) the task was sufficiently difficult to demand

Conclusion

We investigated the interplay of the brain networks for top-down and stimulus-driven attentional control during a visual oddball paradigm. Both target and distractor detection were characterized by the engagement of a ventrolateral frontoparietal network, which indicates a common mechanism of rare-event detection in both conditions. A second dorsolateral frontoparietal network was engaged particularly in the distractor condition. This finding is compatible with a top-down regulated

Acknowledgements

C.B. was supported by an Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (AFI) grant. We thank Ruxandra Sireteanu and Konrad Maurer for constant support and advice and Michael Russ for advice on technical questions.

References (61)

  • E Halgren et al.

    Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1995)
  • Y.-W Jeon et al.

    P3a from passive visual stimulus task

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2001)
  • T.L Jernigan et al.

    Brain activation during word identification and word recognition

    Neuroimage

    (1998)
  • R.T Knight

    Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1984)
  • D.E.J Linden et al.

    Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • K.D Merboldt et al.

    Functional MRI of the human amygdala?

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • D Prvulovic et al.

    Functional imaging of visuospatial processing in Alzheimer's disease

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • C.C Ruff et al.

    The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in conflict processing: evidence from reverse stroop interference

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • M.D Rugg et al.

    The role of the prefrontal cortex in recognition memory and memory for source: an fMRI study

    Neuroimage

    (1999)
  • D.B Smith et al.

    Auditory averaged evoked potentials in man during selective binaural listening

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysio.l

    (1970)
  • N.K Squires et al.

    Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1975)
  • E Wojciulik et al.

    The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • F Barcelo et al.

    Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty

    NeuroReport

    (2002)
  • G.M Boynton et al.

    Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • R Cabeza et al.

    Neural bases of learning and memory: functional neuroimaging evidence

    Curr. Opin. Neurol.

    (2000)
  • V.P Clark et al.

    Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2000)
  • M Corbetta et al.

    Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

    Nat. Rev., Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • K.R Daffner et al.

    The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events

    Brain

    (2000)
  • K.R Daffner et al.

    Disruption of attention to novel events after frontal lobe injury in humans

    J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • R Desimone et al.

    Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (256)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to the work.

    View full text