Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process
Highlights
► Creativity involves both the generation and evaluation of ideas. ► Participants alternated between the two during a novel fMRI creativity paradigm. ► Creative generation was associated with medial temporal lobe activation. ► Creative evaluation activated both the executive and default networks. ► Creativity recruits a unique pattern of opposing neural and cognitive processes.
Introduction
What did Leonardo da Vinci, Albert Einstein, and Thomas Edison possess that allowed them to produce works and ideas that changed how we live our lives and understand the world? Creativity is a quintessential and uniquely human characteristic manifested in art galleries, concert halls, and science laboratories, as well as in everyday activities (Runco, 2004). Often defined in terms of its product, creativity is the ability to produce ideas that are both novel (original and unique) and useful (appropriate and meaningful) (Amabile and Tighe, 1993, Besemer and Treffinger, 1981, Bruner, 1962, Gardner, 1989, Sternberg, 1985). Paralleling this twofold definition of creativity, psychological findings have suggested a twofold creative process that includes generative and evaluative components (Basadur et al., 1982, Campbell, 1960, Finke et al., 1992, Israeli, 1962, Wallas, 1926). For example, one model of the creative process proposes that it begins with the generation of crudely formed ideas and associations, followed by their exploration through evaluation and testing (Basadur et al., 1982, Finke et al., 1992). Similarly, the creative process has been described as the “mutation” of a thought into many different variants to generate ideas and the evaluation of the ideas to select the “fittest” or best variant (Campbell, 1960). Thus, the dichotomy between generation and evaluation appears to be ubiquitous in psychological theories of the creative process, with novel ideas produced during generative phases and their utility assessed during subsequent evaluative phases. This dichotomy is also present in artists' accounts of their own creative process, which they often describe as alternating between rough sketching of ideas and critiquing those ideas to guide the next cycle of sketching and critiquing (Fox, 1997, McMullan, 2010 Dec 2, Victore, 1997). The neural correlates of this distinction, however, have remained largely unknown, and revealing them could further our understanding of creativity and its component processes.
Do different neural networks and brain regions contribute differentially to creative generation and evaluation? While earlier neuroscientific studies of creativity emphasized large-scale brain distinctions such as hemispheric differences (Bekhtereva et al., 2000, Bekhtereva et al., 2001, Carlsson et al., 2000, Finkelstein et al., 1991, Martindale et al., 1984, Sperry, 1964) and frontal versus parietal lobe engagement in creative thinking (Bekhtereva et al., 2004, Chavez-Eakle et al., 2007, Fink et al., 2009, Fink and Neubauer, 2006, Geake and Hansen, 2005, Jung et al., 2010, Miller et al., 1998, Miller et al., 2000, Molle et al., 1996, Molle et al., 1999, Razoumnikova, 2000, Razumnikova, 2007, Starchenko et al., 2003), recent findings point to the possible involvement of specific networks and brain regions in the different components of the creative process.
One network that appears to contribute to creative thinking through its robust association with cognitive control is the executive network. Including, most prominently, the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), the executive network is specifically recruited during conditions of high cognitive control (Desimone and Duncan, 1995, Miller and Cohen, 2001). The DLPFC and dACC are known to be activated during a variety of creative tasks, including piano improvisation (Bengtsson et al., 2007, Berkowitz and Ansari, 2008), creative story generation (Bekhtereva et al., 2000, Bekhtereva et al., 2001, Howard-Jones et al., 2005), word association (Bekhtereva et al., 2004), divergent thinking (Carlsson et al., 2000, Seger et al., 2000), fluid analogy formation (Geake and Hansen, 2005), insight problem solving (Geake and Hansen, 2005, Kounios et al., 2008, Subramaniam et al., 2009), and visual art design (Kowatari et al., 2009). During these creative tasks, high cognitive control enables a deliberate, analytic mode of information processing that facilitates the evaluation of the utility of novel ideas (Howard-Jones and Murray, 2003) and allows individuals to focus on the pertinent task details and to select the relevant generated ideas (Dorfman et al., 2008, Gabora, 2010, Heilman et al., 2003, Lepine et al., 2005, Vartanian et al., 2007). Therefore, the executive network may contribute specifically to the evaluative mode of creative thought.
Another network that plays an important role during creative thought is the default network. It includes, most prominently, the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC)/precuneus, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) (Raichle et al., 2001), which are frequently activated in creativity experiments. For example, enhanced TPJ activity has been found during divergent thinking tasks (Fink and Neubauer, 2006, Grabner et al., 2007), creative story generation (Bekhtereva et al., 2004), hypothesis generation (Jin et al., 2006), fluid analogy formation (Geake and Hansen, 2005), and remote associate insight problems (Jung-Beeman et al., 2004, Subramaniam et al., 2009). Creative story generation also recruits the MPFC (Howard-Jones et al., 2005), while insight problems activate both the MPFC and PCC/precuneus (Geake and Hansen, 2005, Jung-Beeman et al., 2004, Kounios et al., 2008, Subramaniam et al., 2009). Moreover, Limb and Braun (2008) found activation of the default network and deactivation of the executive network during improvisation by professional jazz pianists. However, with the exception of Limb and Braun's (2008) study, only parts of the default network, rather than the whole network, have been associated with creativity tasks.
There are two possibilities regarding the default network's role in creative generation and evaluation. On the one hand, because it is specifically activated during conditions of low cognitive control (Raichle et al., 2001, Shulman and Fiez, 1997), it may facilitate an associative mode of processing that supports the generation of novel ideas (Dorfman et al., 2008, Howard-Jones and Murray, 2003, Vartanian et al., 2007), thereby contributing to creative generation more than to creative evaluation. On the other hand, the default network may contribute more to creative evaluation than to generation, through its role in affective and visceroceptive evaluative processes demonstrated during emotional paradigms. It is activated during the evaluation of emotional reactions (Fossati et al., 2003, Ochsner et al., 2004, Ruby and Decety, 2004) and internally generated affective information (Damasio et al., 2000, Gusnard et al., 2001, Lane et al., 1997, Zysset et al., 2002), which may facilitate the formation and awareness of “gut reactions” that individuals monitor during creative work (de Bono, 2000).
In addition to default network regions, medial temporal lobe (MTL) memory regions such as the hippocampus and the parahippocampus have also frequently been reported during creativity experiments, although they have received relatively little attention to date. For example, the hippocampus exhibits greater recruitment during visual art design (Kowatari et al., 2009) and divergent thinking (Fink et al., 2009). In general, studies have linked the MTL to memory retrieval (Squire et al., 2004) and associative processing (Eichenbaum, 2000). The MTL is activated during the formation and retrieval of semantic and episodic associations (Aminoff et al., 2007, Bar et al., 2008, Henke et al., 1997, Henke et al., 1999, Rombouts et al., 1997), as well as during mental simulations of past, future, and novel events that require the recombination of stored associations (Addis et al., 2007, Botzung et al., 2008, Hassabis et al., 2007, Okuda et al., 2003, Szpunar et al., 2009). The associative function of the MTL implies that it may be particularly important for creative thought by facilitating the generation of novel ideas and associations and the recombination of old ones.
While all three aforementioned networks appear to play important roles in creative thought, their distinct contributions to the different components of the creative process remain unclear. On the basis of the previously reviewed neuroscientific findings, we could hypothesize that: (i) the MTL memory network may contribute to associative processes that would enable creative generation; (ii) the default network may contribute either to creative generation through its role in low cognitive control or to creative evaluation through its role in affective and visceral evaluative processing; and (iii) the executive network may contribute to the analytical evaluative processes required during creative evaluation.
To identify the specific contributions of various brain areas to the creative process, we developed a novel paradigm that separated and alternated between generative and evaluative modes during the performance of a visual book cover design task, used as a creativity exercise in visual arts and design programs. To complete the task, participants used a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-compatible drawing tablet (Tam et al., 2010) that allowed them to actively draw and write their ideas and evaluations while in an fMRI scanner. By doing so, the study used an approach closer to real-life creative activities compared to previous studies, most of which required participants to only imagine their solutions and designs during creativity tasks (Fink et al., 2007).
Section snippets
Participants
The participants (N = 15, after one exclusion; 9 females; M = 22.14 years, SD = 2.25 years) were undergraduates from the Emily Carr University of Art and Design (ECUAD; Vancouver, BC, Canada). All were right-handed with normal or corrected-to-normal vision, had no psychiatric history, and were screened for MRI compatibility. All protocols were approved by the University of British Columbia (UBC; Vancouver, BC, Canada) Clinical Research Ethics Board and the UBC MRI Research Center. The participants gave
Results
To identify the brain regions that demonstrated relatively increased recruitment during the different conditions, each condition was compared to the opposite condition (generate > evaluate and evaluate > generate). There was greater activation when participants were generating ideas than when evaluating them (Fig. 3a, Table 1) in the MTL, specifically the left hippocampus (peak x, y, z = − 32, − 40, − 4; Z = 4.40), right hippocampus (peak x, y, z = 36, − 26, − 12; Z = 3.92), left parahippocampus (Brodmann area
Discussion
The current study examined the hypothesis that creative generation and evaluation are associated with the recruitment of distinct neural processes. To do this, the study employed a novel paradigm that allowed us to separate and alternate between these two fundamental components of the creative process. Consistent with the hypothesized preferential role of the MTL in creative generation, participants showed stronger activation in the MTL, including the hippocampus and parahippocampus, when they
Conclusions
By distinguishing between the processes of creative generation and evaluation, the current study allowed for a more fine-grained characterization of the contributions of various brain areas to the creative process. Furthermore, by allowing participants to draw and write while being scanned, the study also provided a more ecologically valid examination of the creative process. However, a number of questions remain to be answered by future studies. Although the participants were given the
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants to K.C. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC 05–5918) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI F06-0032). We thank Simon Graham and Fred Tam for technical assistance with the development and implementation of the fMRI-compatible tablet, and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
References (136)
- et al.
Remembering the past and imagining the future: common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration
Neuropsychologia
(2007) The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2007)- et al.
Training in creative problem solving: effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization
Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform.
(1982) - et al.
Generation of novel motor sequences: the neural correlates of musical improvisation
NeuroImage
(2008) - et al.
How green is the grass on the other side? Frontopolar cortex and the evidence in favor of alternative courses of action
Neuron
(2009) - et al.
Experiencing past and future personal events: functional neuroimaging evidence on the neural bases of mental time travel
Brain Cogn.
(2008) - et al.
The role of frontopolar cortex in subgoal processing during working memory
NeuroImage
(2002) - et al.
Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching
Neuron
(2003) - et al.
On the neurobiology of creativity: differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects
Neuropsychologia
(2000) - et al.
Cerebral blood flow associated with creative performance: a comparative study
NeuroImage
(2007)
Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning
NeuroImage
Neural basis of spontaneous thought processes
Cortex
Prefrontal organization of cognitive control according to levels of abstraction
Brain Res.
Creativity and speed of information processing: a double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks
Pers. Individ. Differ.
A dual-networks architecture of top-down control
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Eeg alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
Creativity meets neuroscience: experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking
Methods
Neural correlates of intelligence as revealed by fmri of fluid analogies
NeuroImage
The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment
Neuron
Semantic divergence and creative story generation: an fmri investigation
Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.
Differences in brain information transmission between gifted and normal children during scientific hypothesis generation
Brain Cogn.
The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity
Neuropsychologia
Eeg alpha-asymmetry and creativity
Pers. Individ. Differ.
Effects of focal brain lesions on visual problem-solving
Neuropsychologia
Enhanced dynamic complexity in the human eeg during creative thinking
Neurosci. Lett.
Functional neuroanatomy of deductive inference: a language-independent distributed network
NeuroImage
Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the tower of london: fmri and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception
Neuropsychologia
Thinking of the future and past: the roles of the frontal pole and the medial temporal lobes
NeuroImage
Questions of creativity
The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations
Cereb. Cortex
Scenes unseen: the parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se
J. Neurosci.
Study of the brain organization of creativity: 2. Positron-emission tomography data
Hum. Physiol.
Study of the brain organization of creativity: 3. Brain activation assessed by the local cerebral blood flow and eeg
Hum. Physiol.
Pet study of brain maintenance of verbal creative activity
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Analysis of creative products: review and synthesis
J. Creat. Behav.
Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: a functional mri study
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
The conditions of creativity
The brain's default network
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
Analogical reasoning and prefrontal cortex: evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms
Cereb. Cortex
Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes
Psychol. Rev.
Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data
Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.
Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance
Science
The contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition
Rev. Neurosci.
The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex
Psychobiology
Evaluating self-generated information: anterior prefrontal contributions to human cognition
Behav. Neurosci.
Experience sampling during fmri reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness
Nat. Neurosci.
Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions
Nat. Neurosci.
Cited by (426)
How tourism memory boosts creativity? The role of openness to experience
2024, Tourism ManagementThe contribution of divergent and convergent thinking to visual creativity
2023, Thinking Skills and CreativityA systematic framework of creative metacognition
2023, Physics of Life ReviewsComparisons of convergent thinking: A perspective informed by culture and neural mechanisms
2023, Thinking Skills and Creativity