Membrane excitability and excitation–contraction uncoupling in muscle fatigue
Introduction
The actuation of muscle fiber contraction is a complex process involving several distinct steps. It is initiated by the interplay of various brain regions and propagates over the spinal cord to primary motor neurons, which elicit an action potential at the neuromuscular junction. From there, an action potential wave has to spread along the sarcolemma to excite the complete surface of the muscle fiber. At openings of the transverse tubular system the excitation wave propagates deep into the fiber where electrical excitation is subsequently transduced into contraction by a process called excitation–contraction coupling. This is mainly mediated by Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). At all stages of this complex process, beginning from the motivation to perform limb or body movement, across the initiation and coordination of stimulation of motor neurons, downstream to the muscle fiber itself and its subcellular domains, failure might occur which could be objectively expressed as weakness and might be perceived as fatigue [1]. Activation of a muscle fiber goes along with a sequence of distinct alterations in the physical state of cells followed by their recovery. Repetitive activation, as during exercise, can result in the prolonged persistence of an activated state with incomplete recovery between stimuli. If the rate of stimulation is higher than the rate of recovery, the accumulation of remainders can constitute a striking homeostatic challenge. An accumulation like the tetanic increase of sarcoplasmic Ca2+ concentration might be desirable or detrimental, since it increases force but might also trigger excitation–contraction (EC) uncoupling [2]. Myogenic fatigue ultimately develops if the rate of muscle stimulation is higher than the rate of complete recovery. Homeostatic impairments occur at least on four different levels with different time scales: (i) electrical dis- and recharge of the membrane during the action potential, (ii) changes of Na+, K+ and Cl− concentrations, (iii) Ca2+ transients, and (iv) metabolic changes. The action potential represents a rapid discharge of the membrane capacity and its somewhat slower recharge. Since depolarizing currents are mediated by different charge carriers (Na+) than repolarizing currents (K+ and Cl−), every action potential is associated with changes of ion concentrations [3]. The complete restoration of ionic homeostasis is slower than the action potential itself and is not complete within the refractory period. Therefore, fast repetitive stimulation can represent a profound challenge to ionic homeostasis. It compromises excitability and needs mechanisms that upregulate K+ uptake and Na+ extrusion or an adaptive reduction of electrical membrane stability in order to avoid excitation failure. On a similar time-scale changes of free Ca2+ concentration occur. Ca2+ serves as a messenger that activates the contractile machinery but in addition has different signaling functions. The signal Ca2+ transmits (initiation of contraction or cell-signaling) depends on its spatial and temporal occurrence. A strong rise of the EC-coupling signal might be overwhelming and disrupt the microdomains of spatially and temporally organized information processing units within muscle fibers [2].
The contribution of reduced excitability to the development of muscle fatigue depends on the type, intensity and duration of exercise. Especially short bouts of high-intense muscle activity might lead to a decline of fiber excitability. More typical modes of exercise are affected by metabolic or other causes of fatigue. In such cases excitability is essentially maintained by several regulatory mechanisms within muscles. The preservation of excitability has to be traded off against the risk of Ca2+ overload which disturbs the physiological signaling to the contractile machinery and other Ca2+-dependent signal proteins by the activation of proteases that uncouple the excitation–contraction interface [2]. Here we concentrate on electrical excitation of muscle fibers and excitation–contraction coupling in relation to the development of muscular fatigue during exercise. The paper is based on the comprehensive reviews by Ament et al. [1] and Allen et al. [3]. If not quoted otherwise, statements are reasoned by these reviews.
Section snippets
The balance between loss and maintenance of excitability
In respect of electrical excitation, a muscle fiber can be structurally and functionally separated into three distinct compartments: the neuromuscular junction, the sarcolemma and the T-tubular system. Each of these main domains is specialized to serve a distinct function. Their integrated cooperation ensures a reliable and precise electrical response to nerve stimulation. The neuromuscular junction is optimized to elicit a propagating wave of electrical excitation on the sarcolemma with a high
Excitation–contraction uncoupling in muscle fatigue
The breakdown of ATP during exercise leads to an accumulation of inorganic phosphate (Pi) in the cytoplasm and the release of Mg2+ from its complex with ATP [1]. Mg2+ is able to counteract the release of Ca2+ from the SR. Pi also inhibits Ca2+ release by building Ca2+–Pi complexes within the SR and by phosphorylating ryanodine receptors (RyRs), the Ca2+ release channels of the SR. These mechanisms reduce the Ca2+ transient caused by electrical excitation and therefore represent a form of
Concluding remarks
Muscle fatigue evolves due to the slow kinetics of complete recovery from single twitches which is leading to the accumulation of remainders during repetitive stimulation. With regard to sarcolemmal and T-tubular membrane excitability this is expressed by a continuous increment of inactivated voltage-gated Na+ channels, the extracellular and T-tubular accumulation of K+ and changes of Na+ and Cl− concentrations as well as membrane depolarization. These changes synergistically challenge
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgement
The work was supported by research Grants from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2010_A27) and the BMBF (IonoNeuroNet). Frank Lehmann-Horn is endowed Senior Research Professor of the non-profit Hertie-Foundation.
References (16)
- et al.
ATP released by electrical stimuli elicits calcium transients and gene expression in skeletal muscle
J Biol Chem
(2009) - et al.
Exercise and fatigue
Sports Med
(2009) Mechanisms of excitation–contraction uncoupling relevant to activity-induced muscle fatigue
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab
(2009)- et al.
Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mechanisms
Physiol Rev
(2008) - et al.
An analysis of the relationships between subthreshold electrical properties and excitability in skeletal muscle
J Gen Physiol
(2011) - et al.
Voltage-gated ion channels and hereditary disease
Physiol Rev
(1999) - et al.
Chloride conductance in the transverse tubular system of rat skeletal muscle fibres: importance in excitation–contraction coupling and fatigue
J Physiol
(2008) - et al.
Fatigue preconditioning increases fatigue resistance in mouse flexor digitorum brevis muscles with non-functioning K(ATP) channels
J Physiol
(2010)
Cited by (11)
Biomolecules of Muscle Fatigue in Metabolic Myopathies
2024, BiomoleculesNeuromuscular recovery from botulism involves multiple forms of compensatory plasticity
2023, Frontiers in Cellular NeuroscienceDecreased excitability of motor axons contributes substantially to contraction fatigability during neuromuscular electrical stimulation
2021, Applied Physiology, Nutrition and MetabolismAcute and chronic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and postural balance: a review
2020, European Journal of Applied PhysiologyImplementation and experimental validation of surface electromyogram and force model of Tibialis Anterior muscle for examining muscular factors
2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine