Trigger Finger: Adult and Pediatric Treatment Strategies

The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives.

Randomized clinical study.

Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (n = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (n = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups.

There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (p < 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (p = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (p = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis.

MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.

Although ‘congenital’ or paediatric trigger thumb is commonly seen in the paediatric age group, adult presentation is very rare. However it is crucial to acknowledge the occurrence of unusual manifestations of paediatric trigger thumbs, since paediatric trigger thumbs are considered a separate disease entity compared to the commonly seen stenosing tenosynovitis in adults.

We report a case of a 18-year-old young lady presenting with atraumatic locked trigger thumb, which was successfully treated surgically with intra-operative finding confirming abnormally thickened flexor pollicis longus tendon signifying a paediatric trigger thumb pathology.

Adult and paediatric trigger thumbs have different aetiology, with thickened A1 pulley and tendon sheath being the culprit in adults, whereas in paediatric thumbs thickened tendon nodules (Notta's node) are usually the causes of triggering.

This uncommon presentation in this case report is atypical in the age group presentation of paediatric trigger thumb, and should be distinguished from the usual trigger thumb pathology in adults. Although a transient period of extension lag in the early post-operative period may be evident, it can still be successfully treated with surgical release.

The design and efficacy of orthotic intervention to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger vary widely.

To identify types of orthoses (including relative motion), effectiveness, and outcome measurements used to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger.

Systematic review.

The study was undertaken according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registry, number CRD42022322515. Two independent authors electronically and manually searched, and screened 4 databases; selected articles following pre-set eligibility criteria; assessed the quality of the evidence using the Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study; and extracted the data.

Of the 11 articles included, 2 involved pediatric trigger finger and 9 adult trigger finger. Orthoses for pediatric trigger finger positioned finger(s), hand, and/or wrist of children in neutral extension. In adults, a single joint was immobilized by the orthosis, blocking either the metacarpophalangeal joint or the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint. All studies reported positive results with statistically significant improvements and medium to large effect size to almost every outcome measure, including the Number of Triggering Events in Ten Active Fist 1.37, Frequency of Triggering from 2.07 to 2.54, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure from 0.46 to 1.88, Visual Analogue Pain Scale from 0.92 to 2.00, and Numeric Rating Pain Scale from 0.49 to 1.31. Severity tools and patient-rated outcome measures were used with the validity and reliability of some unknown.

Orthoses are effective for non-surgical management of pediatric and adult trigger finger using various orthotic options. Although used in practice, evidence for the use of relative motion orthosis is absent. High-quality studies based on sound research questions and design using reliable and valid outcome measures are needed.

A1 pulley stretching is recognized as a clinically beneficial treatment for trigger finger. It is thought to lead to an increase in the cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region, thus improving trigger finger symptoms. The purpose of the present study was thus to evaluate the resultant forces during stretching that increase the CSA of the A1 pulley luminal region using fresh-frozen cadavers.

Using seven fingers from three fresh-frozen cadavers to replicate A1 pulley stretching, we investigated the resultant forces during stretching that increase the cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region. The traction forces of the flexor digitorum profundus tendons were increased in steps to 150 N, and the cross-sectional area and height of the A1 pulley luminal region were measured using ultrasonography.

The cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region increased with step-wise increases in the flexor digitorum profundus traction. On average, the cross-sectional area and height of the A1 pulley luminal region showed increases of 31.4% and 43.6%, respectively, compared to the unloaded condition.

These results confirmed that A1 pulley stretching increases the cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region. A1 pulley stretching has the potential to reduce the severity of trigger finger in patients facing surgery.

Patients with Green's classification grade 2 or 3 A1-pulley trigger digit (TD) were recruited and randomized to receive the proximal interphalangeal joint–blocking orthosis (PIPJ-BO) or metacarpophalangeal joint–blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO).

TD is a common hand condition that can affect one's performance in activities of daily living. Conservative management of TD involves prescription of orthoses to facilitate recovery. No studies have evaluated the effectiveness of PIPJ-BO, optimal orthosis wear regime, and other factors affecting orthotic effectiveness.

To compare the effectiveness of PIPJ-BO vs MCPJ-BO in TD management.

Outcome measures included pain numerical rating scale, Green's classification grading, and Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Orthosis wear duration was also collated. Patients were followed up for 2 months, and changes between initial and final assessment score within each group and between both groups were analyzed.

Thirty-five patients with 43 TD were included in final analysis. Twenty-three TD were allocated PIPJ-BO while 20 with MCPJ-BO. Pain reduction was observed in both groups, but reduction was greater in PIPJ-BO group (P = .02). About 47.83% in PIPJ-BO group and 40% in MCPJ-BO group improved by at least 1 Green's classification grade. There was only significant improvement in Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score for PIPJ-BO group (P = .0007), and duration of orthosis wear was significantly longer in the PIPJ-BO group (P = .0010). Advancing age was found to have higher rate of orthosis failure.

Findings suggest that both orthoses are effective in reducing pain and disability and improve in triggering symptoms, with PIPJ-BO being more superior. Moreover, PIPJ-BO is less restrictive, has better cosmesis and allowed better functional performance than MCPJ-BO.

PIPJ-BO is more effective than MCPJ-BO in pain reduction and achieved better functional outcome. Orthosis wear of 24 hours for more than 8 weeks is recommended.