Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 112, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 349-356
Ophthalmology

Original article
Clinical phenotypes in carriers of Leber congenital amaurosis mutations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.023Get rights and content

Objective

To determine the clinical phenotypes in carriers with probable disease-causing sequence variations in 1 of 6 genes established to cause Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA).

Design

Observational prospective comparative study.

Participants

Thirty carriers with various probable disease-causing sequence variations in 1 of 6 genes known to cause LCA.

Methods

After the establishment of various disease-causing sequence variations in 37 (33.6%) of 110 patients with LCA, we examined a number of carriers who were either parents or offspring and who were willing to participate in our study. Evaluations included assessment of visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, and full-field electroretinogram (ERG) measurements.

Main outcome measures

Dilated fundus examination and full-field ERGs.

Results

Of the 30 carriers with probable disease-causing sequence variations for LCA, 5 (16.7%) carriers had an AIPL1 variation, 4 (13.3%) CRB1, 0 (0%) CRX, 5 (16.7%) GUCY2D, 9 (30%) RPE65, and 7 (23.3%) carriers had a RPGRIP1 variation. Twenty-nine (96.7%) carriers had 20/20 or better visual acuity in their better seeing eye with correction. Drusenlike deposits were more selectively observed in carriers with mutations in the AIPL1, CRB1, RPE65, and RPGRIP1 genes, whereas mild peripheral chorioretinal atrophy was only observed in AIPL1 and RPE65 carriers. A reduced dark-adapted isolated rod ERG response and/or maximal combined cone and rod response was recorded in carriers with mutations in the AIPL1, GUCY2D, and RPGRIP1 genes. A reduced light-adapted ERG response to a single-flash and/or 32-Hz flicker was recorded in carriers with mutations in the AIPL1, CRB1, GUCY2D, and RPGRIP1 genes. Overall, our cohort of LCA carriers did not describe significant subjective visual difficulties, including nyctalopia and/or photosensitivity.

Conclusions

The variation of phenotypic expression in carriers among 5 LCA genotypes indicates that there is considerable phenotypic overlap. However, phenotypic trends were noted in carriers' fundus findings and ERG responses for each genetic subtype. Observations of phenotypic associations with specific disease-causing sequence variations in carriers have potential practical value for molecular screening strategies of patients with LCA.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Informed consent was obtained from all carriers or their legal guardians in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois Medical Center approved this project. Two of the authors (JAG, GAF) examined 30 carriers from families with various LCA genotypes for both fundus and ERG abnormalities.

Electroretinograms were obtained by either of 2 procedures previously described.14, 15 All ERGs were performed according to International Society for

Results

Classical genetic teaching dictates that recessive mutations cause a phenotype in the affected patient, because both copies of the defective gene are present, but not in the carrier parents and/or children, who carry only 1 copy of the defective allele and are presumably protected by the wild-type allele. Nevertheless, in our cohort, we found that 22 of the 30 LCA carriers (73.3%) had a phenotype determined from detailed ERG measurements and/or careful retinal examination.

Thirty carriers, 17

Discussion

A limited number of reports have previously observed fundus and/or ERG abnormalities in LCA carriers associated with mutations in the AIPL122 (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:5109, 2004), GUCY2D,18 RPE6523, 24 (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41[suppl]:4, 2000), and the RPGRIP1 genes (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:4728, 2004). As in previous reports, we observed a spectrum of clinical phenotypic expression in our cohort of 30 LCA carriers representing 5 different LCA genotypes. To date, reported

References (30)

  • A.I. den Hollander et al.

    Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa with Coats-like exudative vasculopathy are associated with mutations in the crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1) gene

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2001)
  • C.L. Freund et al.

    De novo mutations in the CRX homeobox gene associated with Leber congenital amaurosis

    Nat Genet

    (1998)
  • S.G. Jacobson et al.

    Retinal degenerations with truncation mutations in the cone-rod homeobox (CRX) gene

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1998)
  • E. Silva et al.

    A CRX null mutation is associated with both Leber congenital amaurosis and a normal ocular phenotype

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2000)
  • I. Perrault et al.

    Retinal-specific guanylate cyclase gene mutations in Leber's congenital amaurosis

    Nat Genet

    (1996)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Clinical Perspective: Treating RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy

      2021, Molecular Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      RPE65-IRDs thus serve as a model of a phenotypic continuum modulated by disease severity, a relatively common occurrence in IRDs. Individuals heterozygous for these loss-of-function RPE65 mutations can have minimal fundus changes (yellow-white dots, RPE depigmentation, localized peripheral chorioretinal atrophy), but otherwise normal vision.24 There are an estimated 1,000–2,000 individuals in the US with RPE65-IRDs.

    • The ciliary protein Rpgrip1l in development and disease

      2018, Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, mutations in RPGRIP1L and RPGRIP1 result in different mouse and human ciliopathies (Tables S1, S2 and S3). RPGRIP1 mutations lead to eye defects in mice and humans (Abouzeid et al., 2016; Booij et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2013; Coppieters et al., 2014; Dryja et al., 2001; Fakhratova, 2013; Fernández-Martínez et al., 2011; Galvin et al., 2005; Gerber et al., 2001; Hameed et al., 2003; Han et al., 2017; Hanein et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2017, 2016, 2013; Imani et al., 2018; Kikuchi et al., 2015; Li et al., 2011, 2009; McKibbin et al., 2010; Neveling et al., 2013; Roepman et al., 2005; Sanchez-Navarro et al., 2018; Saqib et al., 2015; Seong et al., 2008; Suzuki et al., 2014; Tiwari et al., 2016; Vallespin et al., 2007; Verma et al., 2013; Walia et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016, 2013; Won et al., 2009; Zernant et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2003), RPGRIP1L mutations affect the development of the brain, the eyes, the lung, the heart, the kidneys, the liver, the limbs, and the skin (Alazami et al., 2012; Arts et al., 2007; Besse et al., 2011; Brancati et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2015; Delous et al., 2007; Doherty et al., 2010; Fahim et al., 2011; Gerhardt et al., 2013; Halbritter et al., 2012; Khanna et al., 2009; Laclef et al., 2015; Otto et al., 2011; Stratigopoulos et al., 2014; Summers et al., 2017; Szymanska et al., 2012; Vierkotten et al., 2007; Wolf et al., 2007). Patients bearing mutations in RPGRIP1 suffer from Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Cone Rod Dystrophy (CRD), Inherited Retinal Dystrophy (IRD) and Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) (Abouzeid et al., 2016; Booij et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2013; Coppieters et al., 2014; Dryja et al., 2001; Fakhratova, 2013; Fernández-Martínez et al., 2011; Galvin et al., 2005; Gerber et al., 2001; Hameed et al., 2003; Han et al., 2017; Hanein et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2017, 2016, 2013; Imani et al., 2018; Kikuchi et al., 2015; Li et al., 2011, 2009; McKibbin et al., 2010; Neveling et al., 2013; Roepman et al., 2005; Sanchez-Navarro et al., 2018; Saqib et al., 2015; Seong et al., 2008; Suzuki et al., 2014; Tiwari et al., 2016; Vallespin et al., 2007; Verma et al., 2013; Walia et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016, 2013; Zernant et al., 2005), while patients with mutations in RPGRIP1L suffer from Meckel syndrome (MKS), Joubert syndrome (JBTS), Cerebellar Vermis Aplasia Oligophrenia Congenital Ataxia Coloboma Hepatic Fibrosis (COACH), Nephronophtisis (NPHP), Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS), Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) (Alazami et al., 2012; Arts et al., 2007; Brancati et al., 2008; Chaki et al., 2011; Delous et al., 2007; Doherty et al., 2010; Fahim et al., 2011; Halbritter et al., 2012; Khanna et al., 2009; Otto et al., 2011; Summers et al., 2017; Szymanska et al., 2012; Wolf et al., 2007).

    • Genotype-functional-phenotype correlations in photoreceptor guanylate cyclase (GC-E) encoded by GUCY2D

      2018, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      An interesting question regarding the effect of GUCY2D mutation on retinal function is whether individuals who carry heterozygous recessive mutations develop any mild signs of retinal disease. Aiming to answer this question, clinical analysis of parents of LCA1 patients has been reported (Galvin et al., 2005; Koenekoop et al., 2002), with a total of four parents who are heterozygous for identified GUCY2D mutations (ages 40–55 years). Some of the patients reported mild and recent visual impairment (including difficulties driving at night and photoaversion during the day) with best-corrected visual acuity that was normal or subnormal and with normal appearance of the retina.

    • Pathobiology of the Outer Retina: Genetic and Nongenetic Causes of Disease

      2014, Pathobiology of Human Disease: A Dynamic Encyclopedia of Disease Mechanisms
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 240288.

    Supported in part by a center grant from The Foundation Fighting Blindness, Owings Mills, Maryland (GAF, EMS); The Grant Healthcare Foundation, Chicago, Illinois; an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York; and Foundation Fighting Blindness Canada, Toronto, Canada, and FRSQ Canada, Montreal, Canada (RKK).

    View full text