Original articleThe Predisposing Pathology and Clinical Characteristics in the Scottish Retinal Detachment Study
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
The Scottish Retinal Detachment study was a prospectively recruited epidemiology study, the methodology of which has been described in detail.4 Between November 1, 2007, and October 31, 2009, we established a comprehensive system in which each primary RRD case presenting to 1 of the 6 vitreoretinal surgical centers in Scotland was approached for study inclusion. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Multicenter Research and Ethics Committee
Results
A total of 1202 incident cases of primary RRD were recruited in Scotland over the 2-year study period. In 1130 cases, data were available on the clinical features of RRD. In total, PVD was present in 87.6% of cases (990/1130), with single or multiple HST RRD accounting for 98.5% of this group (975/990) and GRT RRD accounting for 1.5% of this group (15/990). Posterior vitreous detachment was absent in 12.4% of cases (140/1130), and these comprised RH RRD in 40% (56/140), retinal dialysis in
Discussion
This study represents some of the most extensive and detailed data ever compiled on the epidemiology of RRD and provides important clinical information for vitreoretinal surgeons and useful data for healthcare resource planning.
In our series, both PVD-present and PVD-absent RRD were more common in men. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with PVD demonstrated a higher proportion of right eyes affected and a peak incidence in the sixth decade of life. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
References (25)
- et al.
Risk factors for retinal detachment after cataract surgery: a population-based case-control study
Ophthalmology
(1996) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an overview
Surv Ophthalmol
(1998)- et al.
Retinal detachment in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 through 1995
Ophthalmology
(1999) - et al.
The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978
Am J Ophthalmol
(1982) Risk factors for idiopathic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Am J Epidemiol
(1993)- et al.
The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of primary retinal detachment in Scotland: a two-year prospective population-based study
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
(2010) - et al.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Scotland: research design and methodology
BMC Ophthalmol
(2009) - et al.
Ethnic differences in the demand incidence of retinal detachments in two districts in the West Midlands
Eye (Lond)
(2003) - et al.
Epidemiological study of nontraumatic phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Ophthalmic Res
(2000) - et al.
Retinal detachment in Chinese, Malay and Indian residents in Singapore: a comparative study on risk factors, clinical presentation and surgical outcomes
Int Ophthalmol
(2001)
Northern New Zealand Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study: epidemiology and risk factors
Clin Experiment Ophthalmol
Demand incidence of retinal detachment in Brazil
Eye (Lond)
Cited by (104)
The genetics and disease mechanisms of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
2023, Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchDiagnosis and management of degenerative retinoschisis and related complications
2022, Survey of OphthalmologyCitation Excerpt :Byer reported that in his clinical practice asymptomatic schisis-detachments outnumbered the progressive, symptomatic variety by 178 to 118 and estimated PSSRD as a complication in only 0.05% of cases of degenerative RS. While a Scottish study found RS associated with 1.6% of primary rhegmatogenous RDs,63 Xue and coworkers calculated an annual incidence of PSSRD of only 0.85 per million in the United Kingdom (UK).96 On clinical exam, degenerative RS is characterized by a smooth, transparent elevation of the inner retinal layers that often has a pitted appearance.
Face-down positioning or posturing after pars plana vitrectomy for macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
2024, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Manuscript no. 2010-929.
Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
This study was supported by a major Ophthalmology grant from the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh, the Royal Blind School Edinburgh/Scottish War Blinded, the W.H. Ross Foundation for the Prevention of Blindness and the Chief Scientist Office Scotland (CZB/4/705). The authors received (a proportion of their) financial support from the Department of Health through the award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health.
Competing interests: None declared.
A list of members of the Scottish RD Study Group is available at http://aaojournal.org.