Review article
Congenital rubella syndrome—major review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2008.03.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Congenital rubella syndrome is a rare disorder with devastating ocular and systemic consequences. Although efforts to eradicate the disease have been in place for some time, some areas of the world continue to be affected by this disease. The burden of the disease weighs heavily on patients and society; therefore, vaccination and other preventative strategies should continue to be strongly encouraged.

Section snippets

Historical background of rubella and CRS

In 1752 and 1758, respectively, 2 German physicians, De Bergen and Orlow, discovered the modern day German measles, then known as Röthel.1 It was not until 1866 that the name rubella was given to the disease by the Scottish physician Veale, who further elaborated on its clinical characteristics and significance.2 About a century later in 1941, an Australian ophthalmologist, N. McAlister Gregg, observed that there was resounding evidence of pregnant mothers with rubella transmitting congenital

Epidemiology of CRS

The absolute risk of CRS among children born to mothers infected during pregnancy varies greatly depending on the study, ranging from 1.7 per 1,000 live births in Israel, 0.7 in Oman, 2.2 in Panama, 1.5 in Singapore, and 1.7 in Jamaica.25 Rubella is a worldwide disease, with peak age incidence less than 10 years of age, causing 70% to 90% of the adult population to have been introduced to the disease with those individuals now possessing rubella antibodies. However, vaccination is still

Pathogenesis of CRS

The significance of rubella derives from its teratogenic effects on the fetus when rubella affects pregnant women. The rubella virus is a member of the togavirus family, and the genus, Rubivirus. It is closely related to alphaviruses but differs in that it is not transmitted by vectors. The rubella virus is roughly spherical with a diameter of 60 to 70 nm. It is composed of an icosahedral nucleocapsid containing a single-stranded RNA genome; this is surrounded by a complex lipid envelope.27, 40

Systemic manifestations

The term congenital rubella syndrome is used, as defined by South and Sever,15 to denote any combination of the findings known to result from gestational rubella. The classic CRS is characterized by the combination of cardiac, ocular, and hearing defects, although the active rubella virus in a fetus can infect virtually any organ. As many as 50% of CRS infants will appear normal at birth, but abnormalities of the central nervous system may develop with time.25, 51 The main defects of the

Ocular manifestations

The fetal eye commonly is affected via the bloodstream, although the lymphatic system may also play a minor role in infection transmission.9, 61 Because the fetus does not have cell-mediated or humoral immune defenses until around the 20th week of gestation, the rubella virus can pass virtually unchallenged via the capillary network to every part of the developing eye.9 The ocular pathologies most commonly observed with CRS are nuclear cataracts, microphthalmia, and pigmentary retinopathy.

Diagnosis of rubella during pregnancy

In women affected with rubella during pregnancy, a prenatal diagnosis of a rubella-infected fetus may be beneficial. However, counseling of these women may be difficult because the rate of CRS is always lower than that of the maternal infection rate and because not every infection leads to fetal damage.72

There are 2 accepted forms of early diagnosis, amniocentesis and fetal blood testing. Both tests should be performed 6 to 8 weeks after maternal infection but yield the best reliability if the

Economic consequences

The rubella vaccination program in the United States has resulted in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality and in cost savings over time. In the United States alone, the lifetime cost of treating a patient with CRS is estimated at more than $200,000.75 In other countries, the cost varies, from $63,900 in Guyana, about $50,000 in Barbados, and approximately $14,000 in Jamaica.75, 76 It is estimated that even with the current vaccination strategies in place, 1,500 cases of CRS will

Conclusion

Congenital rubella syndrome is a devastating condition that has multiple consequences for any society, both medical and financial. As such, the implications of this disease are imperative for clinicians and politicians alike to comprehend. To date, preventative strategies have made large differences, but there is still much more work to be done.

References (77)

  • W.P. Boger

    Late ocular complications in congenital rubella syndrome

    Ophthalmology

    (1980)
  • L.Z. Cooper et al.
  • H. Veale

    History of an epidemic of Rotheln with observations on its pathology

    Edin Med J

    (1866)
  • N.M. Gregg

    Congenital cataract following German measles in the mother

    Trans Ophthalmol Soc Aust

    (1941)
  • J.O. Klein et al.

    Current concepts of infections of the fetus and newborn infant

  • J.C. Overall

    Viral infections of the fetus and neonate

  • B.J. Freij et al.

    Chronic infections

  • G.N. Holland

    Infectious disease

  • C. Swan et al.

    Final observations on congenital defects in infants following infectious diseases during pregnancy, with special reference to rubella

    Med J Aust

    (1946)
  • J.F. O'Neill

    The ocular manifestations of congenital infection: a study of the early effect and long-term outcome of maternally transmitted rubella and toxoplasmosis

    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc

    (1998)
  • Harley RD. Discussion comments. In: Boniuk V, Bouiuk M, eds. The prevalence of phthisis bulbi as a complication of...
  • J.L. Sever et al.

    Rubella epidemic, 1964: effect on 6,000 pregnancies

    Am J Dis Child

    (1965)
  • L.Z. Cooper et al.

    Neonatal thrombocytopenic purpura and other manifestations of rubella contracted in utero

    Am J Dis Child

    (1965)
  • S.M. Wolff

    Rubella syndrome

  • M.A. South et al.

    Teratogen update: the congenital rubella syndrome

    Teratology

    (1985)
  • A.J. Rudolph et al.

    Transplacental rubella infection in newly born infants

    JAMA

    (1965)
  • R.H. Green et al.

    Studies on the experimental transmission, clinical course, epidemiology and prevention of rubella

    Trans Assoc Am Physicians

    (1964)
  • S.M. Wolff

    The ocular manifestations of congenital rubella

    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc

    (1972)
  • J. Sigurjonsson

    Rubella and congenital cataract blindness

    Med J Aust

    (1962)
  • A. Rakowsky et al.

    Rubella (German measles)

  • M.L. Lindegren et al.

    Update: rubella and congenital rubella syndrome, 1980-1990

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1991)
  • S.H. Lee et al.

    Resurgence of congenital rubella syndrome in the 1990s: report on missed opportunities and failed prevention policies among women of childbearing age

    JAMA

    (1992)
  • B.J. Frij et al.

    Maternal rubella and the congenital rubella syndrome

    Clin Perinatol

    (1988)
  • J. Arnold

    Ocular manifestations of congenital rubella

    Curr Opin Ophthal

    (1995)
  • E. Miller

    Rubella in the United Kingdom

    Epidemiol Infect

    (1991)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Rubella

  • J.D. Cherry

    Rubella

  • M.A. Burgess

    Rubella reinfection: What risk to the fetus?

    Med J Aust

    (1992)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Predicting congenital rubella syndrome in Japan, 2018–2019

      2019, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text