Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles
Introduction
Paranormal beliefs are widespread among Western people: in North America, more than half of adults believe in psychic powers and extrasensory perception (Orenstein, 2002; Rice, 2003). Some studies indicate that education decreases paranormal beliefs but the empirical evidence is sparse and contradictory (a review: Vyse, 1997). Moreover, the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between paranormal beliefs and education have not been empirically analyzed.
In most studies that have included participants from a wide variety of educational levels, paranormal beliefs have been less prevalent among the more educated (Orenstein, 2002; Otis & Alcock, 1982; Za’rour, 1972). Besides amount of education, the kind of majors people have seems to matter: University students of natural and social sciences, and psychology and medicine students in particular, tend to have less paranormal beliefs than students of art and humanities (Gray & Mill, 1990; Grimmer & White, 1992; Pasachoff, Cohen, & Pasachoff, 1970; Za’rour, 1972). Many studies have also shown contradictory findings: In comparison with students of social science, students of natural science have either held more (Jahoda, 1968), less (Pasachoff et al., 1970), or equal amount of (Salter & Routledge, 1971) beliefs.
Several methodological issues are relevant when considering the results regarding disciplinary differences in paranormal beliefs. First, many of the above mentioned studies date back to four decades, and may not reflect the effect of current education. Second, the methods and results of the earliest studies are not reported in much detail, which hampers their comparison with more recent findings. Third, the sample sizes have typically been small, restricting the reliability of results concerning the frequency of paranormal beliefs in different disciplines. Fourth, the range of studied disciplines has been highly restricted.
Why students of different educational levels and university disciplines show different levels of paranormal belief is yet poorly understood. The few researchers who have brought up the issue have proposed that university students have less paranormal beliefs than students of lower educational levels because their education provides them with critical thinking abilities (Otis & Alcock, 1982; Za’rour, 1972). Likewise, these researchers have proposed that students of art and humanities have more paranormal beliefs than other students because they lack the need to evaluate arguments critically. Critical and analytical thinking is thus assumed to be the generative mechanism through which education influences paranormal beliefs. This is possible because some studies suggest that belief in the paranormal is related to poor critical thinking and low rationality (Gray & Mill, 1990; Musch & Ehrenberg, 2002). Other studies have, however, failed to find such a connection (Roe, 1999). One study even showed a positive relationship between analytical thinking and paranormal beliefs (Wolfradt, Oubaid, Straube, Bischoff, & Mischo, 1999). The contradiction is further deepened by results of some early studies showing relative stability of paranormal beliefs during the years of higher education (Jahoda, 1968; Parida, 1962; Pasachoff et al., 1970; Salter & Routledge, 1971). To untangle the discrepancies between the previous studies, we examined whether analytical thinking and length of education are negatively related to paranormal beliefs, how level and field of education are related to paranormal beliefs, and whether analytical thinking mediates these relationships.
Besides analytical thinking, intuitive thinking may influence the relationship between paranormal beliefs and disciplines. We hypothesized that intuitive thinking is positively related to paranormal beliefs because in thinking intuitively and in justifying paranormal beliefs assessment of information is based on personal experiences and in neither case justification with objective evidence is required; Intuitions and beliefs are rather self-evidently valid (Epstein, Pacini, Denes-Raj, & Heier, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000). Positive connection between intuitive thinking and paranormal beliefs has been reported in earlier work (Epstein et al., 1996; Wolfradt et al., 1999). As intuitive thinking, paranormal beliefs, and creativity all seem related with each other (Gianotti, Mohr, Pizzagalli, Lehmann, & Brugger, 2001), it is possible that intuitive thinking contributes to the enhanced amount of paranormal beliefs in students of creative disciplines such as art and humanities. Thus, we examined whether disciplinary differences in paranormal beliefs are mediated by intuitive thinking.
Finally, we examined gender differences in paranormal beliefs and possible explanations for such differences. Earlier work indicates that women hold more paranormal beliefs than men, with few exceptions such as belief in extraterrestrial life forms (Rice, 2003; Tobacyk & Pirttilä-Backman, 1992; Vyse, 1997). Because men seem to think more analytically and less intuitively than women (Lieberman, 2000; Pacini & Epstein, 1999), we examined whether intuitive and analytical thinking mediate the relationship between gender and paranormal beliefs.
In sum, the following questions and hypotheses were addressed: First, how frequent are paranormal beliefs among Finnish students? Second, do paranormal beliefs vary according to level of education, discipline, and length of the present education? We assumed that university students have less paranormal beliefs than students of vocational school, and that length of education is negatively connected with paranormal beliefs. Third, we hypothesized that belief in the paranormal is connected negatively with analytical thinking and positively with intuitive thinking. Fourth, we predicted that the educational level difference and the effect of length of education on paranormal beliefs are mediated by analytical thinking, and that disciplinary differences in paranormal beliefs are mediated by analytical and intuitive thinking. Fifth, we hypothesized that women hold more paranormal beliefs and are more intuitive and less analytical than men, and that the differences in paranormal beliefs between genders are mediated by analytical and intuitive thinking.
Section snippets
Participants
The participants (N = 3141) were 16–60 years old (M = 24 years, SD = 4.5 years; 6% over age 30) Finnish students, of whom 74% were women. Of the 2414 university students, 77% were women, as well as 63% of the 727 students of vocational school or vocational high school (upper level of vocational school). The participants were from various disciplines as indicated in Table 2. University students (M = 23.85) and vocational school students (M = 23.93) did not differ according to their age, t(3124) = −.38, ns.
Differences in paranormal beliefs between genders and students of two educational levels
Frequencies of paranormal beliefs are presented in Table 1. The most common beliefs were traditional religious beliefs, which, according to the results of a pair-wise t-test, were significantly more common than the next most popular belief, spiritualism, t(3140) = 29.54, p < .001. With regard to the other paranormal beliefs, each of them differed significantly (p < .001) in popularity from the next popular belief, except for spiritualism and extraordinary life forms, t(3141) = 1.62, ns, which did not
Discussion
Previous studies have predominantly indicated that higher educational level and education in certain disciplines such as natural science are related to skepticism toward paranormal beliefs (a review: Vyse, 1997). The reasons have, however, only been speculated about. Moreover, the few studies that have addressed these issues have been limited to a few disciplines. This study extended the previous research by including students from many disciplines and from two educational levels, and by
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by a grant from the Academy of Finland (200828). We thank Kaisa Aunola for statistical help.
References (24)
- et al.
Top-down purification of Tobacyk’s Revised Paranormal Belief Scale
Personality and Individual Differences
(2000) - et al.
Thinking styles, schizotypal traits and anomalous experiences
Personality and Individual Differences
(1999) - et al.
Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1996) - et al.
Associative processing and paranormal belief
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
(2001) - et al.
Critical abilities, graduate education (biology vs. English), and belief in unsubstantiated phenomena
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science
(1990) - et al.
Nonconventional beliefs among Australian science and nonscience students
The Journal of Psychology
(1992) Scientific training and the persistence of traditional beliefs among West African university students
Nature
(1968)Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach
Psychological Bulletin
(2000)- et al.
Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal
British Journal of Psychology
(2002) Religion and paranormal belief
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
(2002)
Factors affecting extraordinary belief
The Journal of Social Psychology
The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs and the ratio-bias phenomenon
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (172)
Valuing epistemic rationality bolsters the effect of analytic thinking on skepticism toward pseudo-profound bullshit
2024, Personality and Individual DifferencesA framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
2023, Advances in Experimental Social PsychologyBelieving is seeing: The link between paranormal beliefs and perceiving signal in noise
2022, Consciousness and CognitionSuperstitious beliefs, locus of control, and feeling at risk in the face of Covid-19
2022, Personality and Individual DifferencesSocial Worldviews Predict the General Factor of Paranormal and Generic Conspiracist Beliefs
2023, Spanish Journal of PsychologyExamining the relationship between metacognitive trust in thinking styles and supernatural beliefs
2024, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology