Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.009Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined connections between paranormal beliefs and educational level, discipline, length of education, gender, and analytical and intuitive thinking. Finnish students (N = 3141) from 14 university and six vocational school disciplines filled in an Internet-based questionnaire. The results showed that university students had less paranormal beliefs than vocational school students, which was partially due to university students’ stronger preference for analytical thinking. Of the university students, those majoring in medicine and psychology held the least beliefs and the students of education and theology held the most beliefs. Length of university education was, however, only slightly negatively associated with paranormal beliefs. Intuitive thinking was positively connected with paranormal beliefs. Women’s higher intuitiveness and lower analytical thinking partially explained their higher amount of beliefs compared to men.

Introduction

Paranormal beliefs are widespread among Western people: in North America, more than half of adults believe in psychic powers and extrasensory perception (Orenstein, 2002; Rice, 2003). Some studies indicate that education decreases paranormal beliefs but the empirical evidence is sparse and contradictory (a review: Vyse, 1997). Moreover, the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between paranormal beliefs and education have not been empirically analyzed.

In most studies that have included participants from a wide variety of educational levels, paranormal beliefs have been less prevalent among the more educated (Orenstein, 2002; Otis & Alcock, 1982; Za’rour, 1972). Besides amount of education, the kind of majors people have seems to matter: University students of natural and social sciences, and psychology and medicine students in particular, tend to have less paranormal beliefs than students of art and humanities (Gray & Mill, 1990; Grimmer & White, 1992; Pasachoff, Cohen, & Pasachoff, 1970; Za’rour, 1972). Many studies have also shown contradictory findings: In comparison with students of social science, students of natural science have either held more (Jahoda, 1968), less (Pasachoff et al., 1970), or equal amount of (Salter & Routledge, 1971) beliefs.

Several methodological issues are relevant when considering the results regarding disciplinary differences in paranormal beliefs. First, many of the above mentioned studies date back to four decades, and may not reflect the effect of current education. Second, the methods and results of the earliest studies are not reported in much detail, which hampers their comparison with more recent findings. Third, the sample sizes have typically been small, restricting the reliability of results concerning the frequency of paranormal beliefs in different disciplines. Fourth, the range of studied disciplines has been highly restricted.

Why students of different educational levels and university disciplines show different levels of paranormal belief is yet poorly understood. The few researchers who have brought up the issue have proposed that university students have less paranormal beliefs than students of lower educational levels because their education provides them with critical thinking abilities (Otis & Alcock, 1982; Za’rour, 1972). Likewise, these researchers have proposed that students of art and humanities have more paranormal beliefs than other students because they lack the need to evaluate arguments critically. Critical and analytical thinking is thus assumed to be the generative mechanism through which education influences paranormal beliefs. This is possible because some studies suggest that belief in the paranormal is related to poor critical thinking and low rationality (Gray & Mill, 1990; Musch & Ehrenberg, 2002). Other studies have, however, failed to find such a connection (Roe, 1999). One study even showed a positive relationship between analytical thinking and paranormal beliefs (Wolfradt, Oubaid, Straube, Bischoff, & Mischo, 1999). The contradiction is further deepened by results of some early studies showing relative stability of paranormal beliefs during the years of higher education (Jahoda, 1968; Parida, 1962; Pasachoff et al., 1970; Salter & Routledge, 1971). To untangle the discrepancies between the previous studies, we examined whether analytical thinking and length of education are negatively related to paranormal beliefs, how level and field of education are related to paranormal beliefs, and whether analytical thinking mediates these relationships.

Besides analytical thinking, intuitive thinking may influence the relationship between paranormal beliefs and disciplines. We hypothesized that intuitive thinking is positively related to paranormal beliefs because in thinking intuitively and in justifying paranormal beliefs assessment of information is based on personal experiences and in neither case justification with objective evidence is required; Intuitions and beliefs are rather self-evidently valid (Epstein, Pacini, Denes-Raj, & Heier, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000). Positive connection between intuitive thinking and paranormal beliefs has been reported in earlier work (Epstein et al., 1996; Wolfradt et al., 1999). As intuitive thinking, paranormal beliefs, and creativity all seem related with each other (Gianotti, Mohr, Pizzagalli, Lehmann, & Brugger, 2001), it is possible that intuitive thinking contributes to the enhanced amount of paranormal beliefs in students of creative disciplines such as art and humanities. Thus, we examined whether disciplinary differences in paranormal beliefs are mediated by intuitive thinking.

Finally, we examined gender differences in paranormal beliefs and possible explanations for such differences. Earlier work indicates that women hold more paranormal beliefs than men, with few exceptions such as belief in extraterrestrial life forms (Rice, 2003; Tobacyk & Pirttilä-Backman, 1992; Vyse, 1997). Because men seem to think more analytically and less intuitively than women (Lieberman, 2000; Pacini & Epstein, 1999), we examined whether intuitive and analytical thinking mediate the relationship between gender and paranormal beliefs.

In sum, the following questions and hypotheses were addressed: First, how frequent are paranormal beliefs among Finnish students? Second, do paranormal beliefs vary according to level of education, discipline, and length of the present education? We assumed that university students have less paranormal beliefs than students of vocational school, and that length of education is negatively connected with paranormal beliefs. Third, we hypothesized that belief in the paranormal is connected negatively with analytical thinking and positively with intuitive thinking. Fourth, we predicted that the educational level difference and the effect of length of education on paranormal beliefs are mediated by analytical thinking, and that disciplinary differences in paranormal beliefs are mediated by analytical and intuitive thinking. Fifth, we hypothesized that women hold more paranormal beliefs and are more intuitive and less analytical than men, and that the differences in paranormal beliefs between genders are mediated by analytical and intuitive thinking.

Section snippets

Participants

The participants (N = 3141) were 16–60 years old (M = 24 years, SD = 4.5 years; 6% over age 30) Finnish students, of whom 74% were women. Of the 2414 university students, 77% were women, as well as 63% of the 727 students of vocational school or vocational high school (upper level of vocational school). The participants were from various disciplines as indicated in Table 2. University students (M = 23.85) and vocational school students (M = 23.93) did not differ according to their age, t(3124) = −.38, ns.

Differences in paranormal beliefs between genders and students of two educational levels

Frequencies of paranormal beliefs are presented in Table 1. The most common beliefs were traditional religious beliefs, which, according to the results of a pair-wise t-test, were significantly more common than the next most popular belief, spiritualism, t(3140) = 29.54, p < .001. With regard to the other paranormal beliefs, each of them differed significantly (p < .001) in popularity from the next popular belief, except for spiritualism and extraordinary life forms, t(3141) = 1.62, ns, which did not

Discussion

Previous studies have predominantly indicated that higher educational level and education in certain disciplines such as natural science are related to skepticism toward paranormal beliefs (a review: Vyse, 1997). The reasons have, however, only been speculated about. Moreover, the few studies that have addressed these issues have been limited to a few disciplines. This study extended the previous research by including students from many disciplines and from two educational levels, and by

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from the Academy of Finland (200828). We thank Kaisa Aunola for statistical help.

References (24)

  • R. Lange et al.

    Top-down purification of Tobacyk’s Revised Paranormal Belief Scale

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2000)
  • U. Wolfradt et al.

    Thinking styles, schizotypal traits and anomalous experiences

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (1999)
  • S. Epstein et al.

    Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1996)
  • L.R.R. Gianotti et al.

    Associative processing and paranormal belief

    Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

    (2001)
  • T. Gray et al.

    Critical abilities, graduate education (biology vs. English), and belief in unsubstantiated phenomena

    Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

    (1990)
  • M.R. Grimmer et al.

    Nonconventional beliefs among Australian science and nonscience students

    The Journal of Psychology

    (1992)
  • G. Jahoda

    Scientific training and the persistence of traditional beliefs among West African university students

    Nature

    (1968)
  • M.D. Lieberman

    Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2000)
  • J. Musch et al.

    Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal

    British Journal of Psychology

    (2002)
  • A. Orenstein

    Religion and paranormal belief

    Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

    (2002)
  • L.P. Otis et al.

    Factors affecting extraordinary belief

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (1982)
  • R. Pacini et al.

    The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs and the ratio-bias phenomenon

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1999)
  • Cited by (172)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text