Original researchImpact of the Chronic Care Model on medication adherence when patients perceive cost as a barrier
Introduction
Poor adherence to prescribed medications is a significant problem for patients with chronic illness. Most estimates suggest that only 50% of patients with diabetes or other conditions take their medication regularly [1], [2], [3]. Using electronic pharmacy records, a recent study found that 22% of patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed a new medication either never picked up the initial prescription or only filled it once [4]. Medication non-adherence contributes to deteriorating symptoms, worsens overall disease burden, and leads to unnecessary hospital admissions and higher health care costs [5].
Previous studies demonstrate that patient characteristics such as age, sex, race, and education are associated with medication adherence [1], [5]. In addition, financial burdens such as low income or socioeconomic status, lack of prescription drug coverage, and high out-of-pocket costs are also significant adherence barriers across a variety of physical and mental health conditions [6], [7], [8]. There is some evidence that non-economic factors may help mitigate the likelihood of reducing medication use in response to financial pressures [2], [6], [9], [10]. Piette and colleagues have proposed a conceptual framework to describe the influence of patient, medication, clinician, and health system factors on individuals’ responses to medication costs [2]. This framework suggests that cost-related medication non-adherence should be evaluated within a broader context that takes into account the role of organizational and social dimensions such as health system factors, patient self-efficacy and patient–provider communication.
The Chronic Care Model (CCM) describes a set of 6 clinical practice elements designed to optimize management of chronic illness – community linkages, organizational support, self-management support, delivery system design, decision support, and clinical information systems. The CCM was developed out of a perceived need to address the gap in evidence-based medicine regarding chronic illness care and effective clinical practice [11]. The goal of treatment aligned with CCM principles is to create “an informed, activated patient interacting with a prepared, proactive practice team, resulting in productive encounters and improved outcomes” [12]. Such activated patients can potentially overcome cost burdens and improve their medication adherence [2], as suggested by recent work in patients with both diabetes and bipolar disorder [13], [14].
Evidence to date suggests that interventions based on the CCM are associated with improved clinical outcomes in terms of quality of life, symptom reduction, and biological markers [15]. A few prior studies have examined whether specific features of the CCM, such as self-management support and improved patient–provider communication, are positively associated with medication adherence [14], [16], [17], [18]. However, limited evidence has addressed whether implementation of the CCM as a whole might positively influence medication adherence or the interaction with perceived medication cost barriers. To the best of our knowledge, no studies of the CCM have used medication adherence as a primary outcome. We hypothesized that the CCM targets and reflects several of the non-cost factors proposed by Piette et al. and therefore modify patients’ decisions regarding medication use due to perceived cost pressures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether receipt of services more consistent with the CCM is positively associated with better medication adherence among patients with chronic disease. Furthermore, we wished to examine whether experiences of better chronic illness care attenuated the relationship between medication adherence and cost burdens.
Section snippets
Setting and subjects
This analysis uses baseline data obtained from a large cluster-randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve treatment delivery via the CCM and diabetes outcomes in community clinics (for full study details, see Parchman et al. [19]). Beginning in 2007, forty small, autonomous, community-based primary care practices in South Texas were recruited to participate in this trial. These practices are representative of typical small primary care practices serving patients with type 2 diabetes,
Results
O the 2392 surveys collected, 76% (n = 1823) of respondents endorsed having one or more chronic diseases and all were included in this analysis. Patient characteristics are reported in Table 1. Mean patient age was approximately 52 years (SD 16.7), with 65% females and 50% of Hispanic race/ethnicity, while nearly one-third completed some college. The average number of chronic diseases was 2.4 (SD 2.6). The majority of patients with chronic disease had excellent, very good, or good medication
Discussion
In this study of patients with a chronic illness receiving care in small primary care clinics, prescription costs and perceptions of care experiences were significantly associated with medication adherence. Overall, the relationship between cost burden and medication adherence was only slightly modified by the degree to which these chronic illness care was experienced. However, given the high prevalence of poor adherence among chronically ill individuals and intervention challenges, this
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have any conflicts of interests, financial or in terms of personal relationships, that could potentially bias this work.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Nedal Arar, Raymond Palmer, and Laurel Copeland for additional suggestions and contributions to this manuscript. This project was supported by funding provided through award number NIH/NIDDK R18DK075692 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases or the
References (30)
- et al.
Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review
JAMA
(2002) A conceptually based approach to understanding chronically ill patients’ responses to medication cost pressures
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2006)Adherence to Long-term Therapies: Evidence for Action
(2003)New prescription medication gaps: a comprehensive measure of adherence to new prescriptions
Health Serv. Res.
(2009)- et al.
Adherence to medication
N. Engl. J. Med.
(2005) Factors influencing cost-related nonadherence to medication in older adults: a conceptually based approach
Value Health
(2010)- et al.
Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk
Am. J. Public Health
(2004) - et al.
Self-restriction of medications due to cost in seniors without prescription coverage
J. Gen. Intern. Med.
(2001) Cost-related nonadherence to medications among patients with diabetes and chronic pain: factors beyond finances
Diabetes Care
(2009)The role of patient–physician trust in moderating medication nonadherence due to cost pressures
Arch. Intern. Med.
(2005)
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Health Aff. (Millwood)
Interventions to improve chronic illness care: evaluating their effectiveness
Disease Manage.
Diabetes and medication adherence: the association between perceived drug costs and the therapeutic alliance
Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence, and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a STARNet study
Ann. Family Med.
Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium
Health Aff. (Millwood)
Cited by (24)
The relationship between hypertensive patients' satisfaction with hypertension care and their antihypertensive medication adherence
2023, Journal of Vascular NursingRisk Factors for 30-Day Readmission in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease
2017, American Journal of MedicineCitation Excerpt :A chronic care model with patient centeredness (PCMH)30 may help address these challenges,31-33 but prospective studies in a larger cohort of adult sickle cell disease patients are needed to help validate these identified modifiable risk factors, and other yet-unidentified factors contributing to their high 30-day readmission rate.
A systematic literature review of psychosocial and behavioral factors associated with initial medication adherence: A report of the ISPOR medication adherence & persistence special interest group
2013, Value in HealthCitation Excerpt :Such organizational interventions introduced at the commencement of treatment rather than later can yield substantial benefits. Out-of-pocket costs are difficult to address, yet individuals perceiving that their treatment is more patient-centered do experience lower cost-related adherence problems [50]. Unlike numerous studies associating poor adherence in general to negative ramifications, only a few of these publications linked initial nonadherence to clinical outcomes.
Analyzing the effects of shared decision-making, empathy and team interaction on patient satisfaction and treatment acceptance in medical rehabilitation using a structural equation modeling approach
2013, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Besides physiological outcome parameters (e.g., reduced symptoms, improved functional capacity and pain control), positive effects of SDM have also been mentioned for mental health outcomes [1,13,18,64]. Study findings show an increase in patients’ satisfaction, compliance and treatment acceptance [7], an increase in transfer to everyday life [1,13] and an improvement in quality of life and medication adherence [65,66], as well as a reduction of decision conflicts, anxiety [6] and medication costs [65]. Additionally, improvements in physician–patient communication, risk perception, and patient knowledge have been reported [15].
Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study
2023, BMC Health Services ResearchReferral to Adolescent Weight Management Interventions: Qualitative Perspectives From Providers
2023, Journal of Pediatric Psychology