The Dutch cancer information helpline: More critical patients after 10 years
Introduction
Since 25 years, people in the Netherlands have the possibility to contact the information helpline of the Dutch Cancer Society. This helpline aims to increase knowledge about cancer and decrease taboos and fears concerning cancer. Trained oncology educators with a medical or paramedical background provide psychosocial support and information about cancer in a personal conversation, and people can receive written information (e.g. brochures). The helpline is open for the public during office hours and additionally can be contacted 24 h a day for ordering brochures. The primary target groups of the helpline are the general public, patients and family or friends of cancer patients. In 1994, a study evaluated the experiences and impact of this helpline [1]. Since the last study, the information helpline went through some changes. In order to more efficiently provide callers with information and support, a voice response system (VRS) was developed and installed in 1995. The VRS substitutes a part of the conversation between the caller and the educator, namely the introduction and the part where people can order information brochures. The present study was conducted in order to assess experiences and impact of the Dutch national cancer information helpline as well as assessing differences in evaluation and impact with the 1994 Study.
Information helplines can generally be divided in two groups. The most basic and least labour-intensive helplines use tapes with recorded health messages [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The function of these indirect helplines is to provide information and communication is directed only one-way towards the caller. Specific questions of the callers are not directly answered. Direct helplines use educators who can react directly to the callers’ questions and reactions, resulting in interpersonal communication [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Besides providing general information, direct helplines also provide more personal and individualised information as well as psychosocial support. The Dutch information helpline is a combination of the two types; since 1995, the helpline uses recorded messages (VRS) as well as educators for more interpersonal communication.
Earlier studies on cancer helplines show that three major target groups can be distinguished, namely patients, relatives and friends of patients, and the general public. Cancer patients and relatives and friends are the largest groups [1], [7], [8], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The large majority of the callers are female, varying from 67% [5] to almost 80% [7], [13], [16], [17], [18]. The mean age is relatively low and is often inversely related to the age incidence of cancers [1], [13], [19]; i.e. although the cancer incidence rises with age, the mean age of the respondents is relatively low. Further, patients are highest in age and the general public has the lowest age [1], [15], [19]. People who contact information helplines are mostly more educated than the average population [1], [20], [21], [22].
Several studies evaluated helplines. Overall satisfaction with the helplines was reported by at least 90% of the respondents [1], [16], [18], [21], [22]. Lechner and De Vries [1] reported that most callers’ expectations were largely or completely met. With respect to the emotional impact of the call, research showed a decrease in tension and anxiety after respondents’ call to the helpline [1], [16], [18], [19], [20], [22]. Overall satisfaction was predicted by the callers’ evaluation of the received information and the communication skills of the educators [1], [16]. Lechner and De Vries [1] reported that for the general public and relatives/friends, the received information seemed to be the more important predictor, whereas for patients the communication skills was most important. Regarding the satisfaction of the caller's expectations, both communication skills and the received information were significant predictors for all target groups. Lastly, only the educator's communication skills could significantly predict the impact on anxiety for relatives/friends and patients. McGuire's Persuasion-Communication Theory [23] assumes that successful communication is dependent on several input factors within communication, which are also important concepts within the integrated model for exploring motivational and behavioural change (the I-Change Model) [24], [25]: the quality of the message or information, the channel or medium, and the source. Applied to the present study, the message includes the information about cancer provided to the callers; the channel or medium is the telephone and the sources of communication are the helpline educators with their communication skills. For the present study, the outcome of successful communication is defined as the overall satisfaction with the information helpline or a decrease in anxiety or concern.
The first purpose of this paper is to describe the differences between the three target groups (patients, relatives/friends, and general public) regarding the input factors (i.e. information, communication skills of the educators, and telephone aspects) and the outcomes (satisfaction, anxiety, and meeting expectations). The second goal is to analyse the extent to which the outcome measures for the three target groups are explained by the different input factors.
Section snippets
Methods
To examine and evaluate experiences and impact of the helpline, two measurements were used, which were similar to the ones used by Lechner and De Vries [1]. First, during the actual call with the helpline, several demographic data were recorded by means of a standardised computerized registration form. Callers were asked about the target group to which they belonged, gender and age, the type of cancer, and the stage of cancer of the caller. These data were used to analyse significant
Characteristics of the sample and response
From December 2003 until March 2004, 1367 persons called the Dutch cancer information helpline, of which 1128 callers (83%) agreed to participate in the present study by completing a postal questionnaire. Of these 1128, 665 respondents returned the questionnaire, resulting in a total response of 59%. Although we found no significant differences in age, sex, or target group between responders and non-responders, relatively more callers with an upcoming treatment for their cancer responded to the
Discussion
The present study assessed experiences with and impact of the Dutch national cancer information helpline. Caller demographics were comparable with other studies on measuring impact of information helplines. In most studies, patients and relatives/friends of patients are the largest group [1], [7], [8], [13], [14], [15], [16], women comprise the majority of the callers [1], [16], [17], [19], and patients have the highest age [1], [15], [19].
Callers evaluated the different telephone aspects
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society. The authors are grateful to Cora Honing and Ronald Knipping and the helpline educators for their help with this project. We thank Margien Veling for her help in the data-gathering process.
References (27)
- et al.
The dutch cancer information helpline; experience and impact
Patient Educ Couns
(1996) - et al.
An evaluation of demographic differences in the utilization of a Cancer Information Service
Soc Sci Med
(1983) - et al.
Telephone counseling in psychosocial oncology: a report from the cancer information and counseling line
Patient Educ Couns
(2002) - et al.
Meeting information needs of significant others: use of the Cancer Information Service
Patient Educ Couns
(1990) The patient from receiver of information to informed decision-maker
Patient Educ Couns
(1998)- et al.
Aids: public response to a telephone information system
J Cancer Educ
(1989) - et al.
Measuring response to a cancer information telephone facility: Can-Dial
Am J Public Health
(1976) - et al.
Can-Dial: an experiment in health education and cancer control
Public Health Rep
(1976) - et al.
Cancer information by telephone: a two-year evaluation
Health Educ Mon
(1977) - et al.
The Cancer Information Service as a laboratory for research: the first 15 years
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
(1993)
History of the Cancer Information Service
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
The first 15 years: what has been learned about Cancer Information Service and the implications for the future
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
Promoting smoking cessation in the United States: effect of public service announcements on the Cancer Information Service telephone line
J Natl Cancer Inst
Cited by (12)
Demographic characteristics, call details and psychosocial support needs of the family/friends of someone diagnosed with cancer who access Australian Cancer Council telephone information and support services
2017, European Journal of Oncology NursingCitation Excerpt :Further research is required to target health professionals to increase awareness of this service to support persons with cancer and their family/friends and to help bridge the current, frequently cited communication gap between health care providers and families affected by cancer (Ekberg et al., 2014; Morra et al., 2007; Reid and Porter, 2011). The vast majority of calls to the Cancer Council 13 11 20 service were from women, aged 40–59 years and of middle to high socio-economic background, which is consistent with the international literature reporting on cancer telephone support usage by patients and family members/friends (Arnaboldi et al., 2010; Dean and Scanlon, 2007; Marcus et al., 2002; Morra et al., 2007; Reid and Porter, 2011; Reubsaet et al., 2006). This highlights the need for future research to investigate potential barriers or other available sources of support, that may explain why some groups are underrepresented in terms of accessing information and support from cancer telephone support services in Australia, as well as internationally.
Closing calls to a cancer helpline: Expressions of caller satisfaction
2015, Patient Education and CounselingDo cancer helplines deliver benefits to people affected by cancer? A systematic review
2014, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Traditionally, the success of cancer helplines has been measured in terms of caller use, satisfaction, and acceptability. Satisfaction surveys [33–37] suggest that the majority of helpline callers are generally satisfied with the information they received, the way their call was managed, and the consultant's knowledge and approach. While evidence of caller satisfaction and acceptability are important indicators of service delivery, these outcomes do not demonstrate whether cancer helplines are effecting a change in the callers’ psychosocial well-being.
Evaluation of the Dutch AIDS STI information helpline: Differential outcomes of telephone versus online counseling
2012, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :The follow-up questionnaire evaluated whether they had acted on the advice they had received. Measures were based on those used by Bos and colleagues [5] and Reubsaet and colleagues [4]. Participants were asked to indicate their gender, age, level of education, and ethnic background.
Are cancer helplines effective in supporting caregivers? A systematic review
2019, Supportive Care in CancerTelephone hotline for aging: Information needs, quality of service, and insights
2018, International Social Work