Patient Perception, Preference and ParticipationInformation needs and preferences of women as they proceed through radiotherapy for breast cancer
Introduction
A lack of information and support prior to commencing cancer treatment causes psychological distress to both patients and their families [1], [2]. Patients who are poorly informed are likely to be dissatisfied with their care, have difficulty coping and also experience a reduced sense of well-being [3], [4]. Furthermore, a lack of information may lead to increased uncertainty, unnecessary anxiety and distress and may also have a negative impact on the patients’ treatment decisions [1]. Previous studies suggest that the provision of information may be correlated to a number of dependent variables, including: patient anxiety and depression; coping and self efficacy; and knowledge [1], [5], [6], [7].
Patient anxiety and depression following a cancer diagnosis is often high. Two studies conducted in the United Kingdom and Australia [8], [9] found that 45–46% of breast cancer patients experience borderline clinically relevant levels of anxiety [10] and 10–12% experience borderline clinically relevant levels of depression post-treatment using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADs). Research is required to determine how these anxiety levels change as patients’ information needs are met and they progress through radiotherapy.
Public awareness of radiotherapy and its role in cancer treatment is limited [11]. Uptake of radiotherapy may be increased if patients have a better understanding of radiotherapy and are provided with adequate information at appropriate times following their diagnosis. Previous studies have identified that the following radiotherapy related topics should be discussed with patients prior to radiotherapy: radiotherapy in general, the goals of treatment, their cancer diagnosis, treatment side-effects, when tests and physical exams would be performed and treatment alternatives [12], [13], [14], [15]. However, these studies did not examine these topics in detail or assess when information should be provided. Harrison et al. [16] expanded on these studies by surveying 125 breast cancer patients at four time points: during the first week of treatment, during the third week of treatment, at the end of treatment and one month after treatment. Participants reported that disease and treatment related information was important at all time points. Although this study investigated the timing of information during radiotherapy, it did not assess the specific radiotherapy related concerns and information needs of patients. It is likely that patients have concerns and information needs that are directly related to the experience of receiving radiotherapy as well as their cancer in general. In our earlier work we therefore developed and piloted two scales to measure patient concerns and information needs during radiotherapy [17].
Several randomised controlled trials [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] were conducted using different educational interventions (e.g. written material, videos, one-on-one meetings, group education sessions) with breast cancer patients to determine whether they can decrease patient anxiety and depression and improve patient satisfaction and knowledge. However, only two studies found they were able to reduce anxiety. The first, conducted by D’Haese et al. [23] examined whether staggered information provided at two time points (following first visit to radiotherapy and on third or fourth day of treatment) (n = 37) reduced patient anxiety, compared with provision of all information on the first visit (n = 31). Patients were provided with an information booklet and teaching sheets. Those who received staggered information received the information booklet on the first occasion and teaching sheets on the second. The state-trait anxiety inventory [24] was used to measure patients’ levels of anxiety before their treatment planning appointment, during the second week of treatment and during the last week of treatment. Patients were significantly less anxious if they were provided with staggered information rather than all information at one time point. However, this study was limited because the baseline measurement of anxiety was taken after patients had been provided with the information booklet. The second study by Thomas et al. [19] found that they were able to significantly reduce patient anxiety when they provided an educational video prior to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The educational video provided a comprehensive description of therapy, an indication of the associated risks and patients’ personal accounts of treatment, side effects and management. Patients completed questionnaires (including the hospital anxiety and depression scale) after their consultation with their oncologist and three weeks after commencing their treatment. Results showed that the video significantly reduced patient anxiety (p = 0.001). Although, this was a significant result, it is unknown whether patients felt significantly less anxious prior to their treatment planning appointment or treatment commencement. Furthermore, the information provided in the video focused on general information about radiotherapy and its associated side effects and failed to provide patients with information about the procedures they were about to undergo or detailed information about what the experience is like. Additionally, the provision of the video did not facilitate providing patients with tailored information or allow patients to be involved in discussing their fears, concerns and decisions as they progressed through treatment [16], [25].
In order to tailor information for breast cancer patients we need to have an understanding of their specific information needs and preferences for different types and sources of information as they progress through radiotherapy. To date, there has been a lack of quantitative research that provides a detailed account of breast cancer patients’ information needs and preferences as they progress through their radiotherapy treatment. Our previous qualitative research provides a summary of the possible information needs that patients may have as they progress through treatment [26]. The aims of this study were to: (1) Prioritise breast cancer patients’ radiotherapy related information needs and concerns as they progress through treatment; (2) determine which information needs are currently not being met; (3) ascertain which information sources patients prefer; and (4) explore whether the provision of information reduces patient anxiety and depression over time. The following research questions were identified: (1) what concerns do patients have about radiotherapy as they progress through treatment; (2) what are patients’ highest information needs as they progress through treatment and how do these information needs change over time; (3) which information needs are currently not being met; (4) which information sources do patients prefer; and (5) how do patients’ anxiety and depression levels change as they progress through treatment.
Section snippets
Methods
Ethics approval was gained from Curtin University of Technology and the two clinical facilities where patients were recruited.
Results
One-hundred and twenty-three women participated in this study. The response rate was 80% (123 out of 153). The main reason for non-participation was lack of time. Of the 123 participants, 122 returned surveys at Time 1, 110 returned surveys at Time 2, 107 returned surveys at Time 3, and 115 returned surveys at Time 4. Participants were not excluded if they missed completing one questionnaire. The mean age of participants was 54 years old (SD 8.26, Min = 35, Max = 78). The demographics are shown in
Patients information needs and concerns
This study provides an understanding of patients’ highest information needs and concerns as they progress through radiotherapy. Although health professionals might assume that patients’ concerns would decrease after treatment commencement, the only concern that significantly declined in importance was the impact treatment would have on the patient's life. Additional discussions with patients about their particular concerns, may help to alleviate these concerns prior to treatment. In our
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
The lead author of this manuscript was supported by a National Breast Cancer Foundation postdoctoral research fellowship while conducting this study. Funding was obtained to conduct this study from the Cancer Council of WA and the Nicholas Outterside Memorial Trust run by the Australian Institute of Radiography. The authors wish to thank all participants in the study and Sylvia Heavens and Karen Taylor and other staff from the WA Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care who assisted in recruiting
References (41)
- et al.
Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care
The Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Social psychological correlates of paying attention to cancer symptoms and seeking medical help
Soc Sci Med
(2003) - et al.
Age-specific norms and determinants of anxiety and depression in 731 women with breast cancer recruited through a population-based cancer registry
Eur J Cancer
(2003) - et al.
Are we addressing patients’ needs in radiation oncology practice? Results of patients’ satisfaction pilot survey
Can J Med Radiat Technol
(2006) - et al.
Information needs and preference for information of women with breast cancer over a first course of radiation therapy
Patient Educ Couns
(1999) - et al.
Forewarned is forearmed – benefits of preparatory information on video cassette for patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy – a randomised controlled trial
Eur J Cancer
(2000) - et al.
Evaluating patient education materials about radiation therapy
Patient Educ Couns
(2004) - et al.
Effects of information supply on satisfaction with information and quality of life in cancer patients receiving curative radiation therapy
Patient Educ Couns
(2001) - et al.
Information for the radiotherapy patient
Radiography
(1999) - et al.
Screening for depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the hospital anxiety and depression scale
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
(1993)
Effectiveness of health education and health promotion: meta-analysis of effect studies and determinants of effectiveness
Patient Educ Couns
The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support
Ann Oncol
Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003)
Patient Educ Couns
A patient orientation program at a comprehensive cancer centre
Oncol Nurs Forum
Clinical and psychological outcomes of patient education in rheumatoid arthritis
Musculoskelet Care
Do older patients feel able to cope with illness following telephone consultations? A multi-practice survey in the UK
Curr Med Res Opin
Can 40 s of compassion reduce patient anxiety?
J Clin Oncol
The effect of preparatory patient education on the anxiety and satisfaction of cancer patients receiving radiation therapy
Cancer Nurs
An investigation into the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with breast cancer
Health Qual Life Outcomes
The hospital anxiety and depression scale
Acta Psychiatr Scand
Cited by (98)
Patient Education Practices and Preferences of Radiation Oncologists and Interprofessional Radiation Therapy Care Teams: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Strategies for Effective Patient Education Delivery
2024, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsUsing virtual reality to prepare patients for radiotherapy: A systematic review of interventional studies with educational sessions
2023, Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation OncologySilenced: Patients’ experiences of voicelessness in head and neck cancer
2022, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :This reflects research that demonstrates the importance of tools that support verbal communication for mental health and wellbeing in HNC [20,31]. The second tension of time-pressure and mindful communication is interesting; time-pressure is a normal part of health care settings, but earlier work has noted the high technology clinical spaces and time-pressures of radiation treatment centres contributed to anxiety and distress for many patients, who described feeling dehumanised [32,33]. The participants in this study articulated this as feeling rushed or ‘on a production line’ which made communication difficult and limited to procedural necessity.
Resource planning principles for the radiotherapy process using simulations applied to a longer vacation period use case
2021, Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation OncologyDoes a communication skills program enable symptom and distress screening?: The impact of training on radiation therapists’ confidence, knowledge, and use of distress screening
2021, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences