Communication StudyWhy should I talk about emotion? Communication patterns associated with physician discussion of patient expressions of negative emotion in hospital admission encounters
Introduction
Research in outpatient settings demonstrates that empathy is a key element in physician–patient communication [1], [2], [3], [4]. It encourages discussion of patients’ distress [1], [5] and is associated with decreased anxiety, increased satisfaction, and improved medical outcomes [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Despite these benefits, outpatient studies have shown that physicians infrequently respond with empathy to patient expressions of negative emotion [1], [2], [3], [5], [12], [13], [14], [15].
Physician–patient communication is an increasingly important quality measure of inpatient care [16]. Hospitalization may be a source of increased emotional distress for patients, and physician empathy may be a key factor in communication in the hospital. The hospitalist model – in which hospitalized patients are cared for not by their outpatient physicians, but by physicians who specialize in inpatient care – now provides care to most hospitalized medical patients in the US, and a rapidly growing number worldwide [17], [18]. This model has shown benefits in patient outcomes, quality of care, and education [19], [20]; yet, concerns remain about its effects on the physician–patient relationship [21]. The goals of this study were to understand how hospitalists respond to patients’ expressions of negative emotion and to identify how different types of responses influence further communication in the encounter.
Section snippets
Design and setting
We qualitatively analyzed attending physician–patient admission encounters which were audio-recorded between August 2008 and March 2009 on the general medical services at two hospitals within a university system [22].
Participants
All attending hospitalist physicians at the two hospitals were eligible. Eligible patients were admitted under the care of – but had not yet met – a participating physician and were able to communicate verbally in English and provide informed consent.
Recruitment and data collection
Physicians were recruited
Patient expressions of negative emotion
We analyzed 79 patients’ admission encounters with 27 physicians (Table 2). Consent rates were 91% for physicians and 66% for patients [22]. We identified 190 instances of patient emotional expression, 58% indirect and 42% direct. The median number of expressions per encounter was 1, range 0–14; 71% of encounters contained at least one expression.
Physician responses
Table 1 provides examples of physician responses by category: away, neutral, and toward. Percentages of physician responses within each category are
Discussion
In our qualitative analysis of physician–patient hospital admission encounters, we found that patients verbally expressed negative emotion in most encounters, and that physicians most often responded with statements that allowed or explicitly encouraged continued discussion of emotion. Physician responses that focused discussion away, toward, or neither toward nor away from emotion were each associated with distinct patterns of further communication within the encounters.
We found a higher
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patients and physicians who generously donated their time to participate in this study. Dr. Anderson was funded by the National Palliative Care Research Center and the University of California San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute Career Development Program, which is supported by NIH grant number 5 KL2 RR024130-04. The University of California San Francisco Academic Senate funded study expenses.
References (35)
- et al.
Negative emotions in cancer care: do oncologists’ responses depend on severity and type of emotion?
Patient Educ Couns
(2009) - et al.
The effects of physicians’ affect-oriented communication style and raising expectations on analogue patients’ anxiety, affect and expectancies
Patient Educ Couns
(2010) - et al.
Physicians’ responses to patients’ expressions of negative emotions in hospital consultations: a video-based observational study
Patient Educ Couns
(2011) A systematic review of outcomes and quality measures in adult patients cared for by hospitalists vs. nonhospitalists
Mayo Clin Proc
(2009)- et al.
Studying physician–patient communication in the acute care setting: the hospitalist rapport study
Patient Educ Couns
(2011) - et al.
Patients’ negative emotional cues and concerns in hospital consultations: a video-based observational study
Patient Educ Couns
(2011) - et al.
Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES)
Patient Educ Couns
(2011) - et al.
Development of the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences to code health providers’ responses (VR-CoDES-P) to patient cues and concerns
Patient Educ Couns
(2011) - et al.
Empathic communication and gender in the physician–patient encounter
Patient Educ Couns
(2002) - et al.
A model of empathic communication in the medical interview
J Amer Med Assoc
(1997)