Review
Educational interventions for cancer pain. A systematic review of systematic reviews with nested narrative review of randomized controlled trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Patient educational interventions can improve cancer pain management.

  • Patient benefits of cancer pain education for professionals are less clear.

  • All cancer pain educational interventions share common key components.

  • Key components are modeled to inform the development of future interventions.

Abstract

Objectives

Educational interventions are one approach to improving cancer pain management. This review aims to determine whether educational interventions can improve cancer pain management and to characterize components of cancer pain educational interventions.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched. Systematic reviews that assessed educational interventions to improve cancer pain management were included. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from each review. A narrative approach was taken to summarizing the nature and components of interventions.

Results

Eight systematic reviews and 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. Interventions targeting patients can achieve small to moderate reductions in pain intensity. Interventions targeting professionals can improve their knowledge but most trials have not assessed for resultant patient benefits. All interventions included at least one of seven core components: improving knowledge about the nature of cancer pain; aiding communication about cancer pain; enhancing pain assessment; improving analgesic prescribing; tackling barriers to analgesic non-adherence; teaching non-pharmacological pain management strategies; and promoting re-assessment.

Conclusions

Cancer pain educational interventions can improve pain outcomes. They are complex heterogeneous interventions which often contain a combination of active components.

Practice implications

Suggestions are made to aid the development of future interventions.

Introduction

Cancer incidence and prevalence rates are increasing in developed countries due to an aging population and improvements in screening and treatment [1]. Pain of moderate to severe intensity affects around 40% of cancer patients at diagnosis, rising to 70% or more at the end of life [2], [3]. Cancer pain is burdensome at an individual and health care level [4]. For example, in Scotland, over 30% of primary care out of hours contacts for cancer symptoms relate to pain and around 14% of these patients are managed with education and advice [5]. Several large studies of emergency department visits by oncology patients in the USA and Canada have shown that pain is the most frequent reason for attendance, [6], [7] and that around 30% could be avoided [8]. These figures suggest considerable and potentially preventable suffering and healthcare utilization due to poor cancer pain management despite effective treatments being available [9].

Suboptimal cancer pain management is likely to be a product of both patient and health care provider (HCP) behaviors. For example there is evidence that patients do not always report their pain to HCPs, [10] can have difficulty communicating with HCPs about cancer pain and associated symptoms [11], and intentionally or unintentionally fail to adhere to prescribed analgesic regimes [12]. Studies have identified various determinants of these behaviors: patients are less likely to report their pain to a HCP if they believe that cancer pain is inevitable and uncontrollable [13] and they may under-report pain to keep the clinician focused on other aspects of their condition during the clinical assessment [14]. Pain monitoring by patients can be problematic and subject to recall bias and under-estimation, for example current pain ratings taken at an appointment do not correlate well with self-reported measures in daily or hourly pain diaries [15]. Patients’ beliefs and attitudes about analgesic side effects, addiction, and tolerance are known to influence medication adherence and subsequent pain control [16]. Intentional analgesic non-adherence can also occur if patients believe that pain is a helpful and necessary symptom, for example as an indicator of disease progression [17].

HCP behaviors may also prevent effective cancer pain management. It is known that analgesic prescriptions for patients with cancer pain are frequently suboptimal. Common deficiencies in analgesic prescriptions include failure to prescribe “around the clock” long acting analgesics, insufficient dosing of breakthrough medication, and failure to utilize adjuvant agents [18], [19]. Determinants of these behaviors include inadequate knowledge about pain assessment and opioid prescribing [20], [21] and concerns about hastening death with strong opioids [20].

Patient and HCP knowledge and attitudes appear to combine to influence patient-provider interactions and pain management behaviors. Interventions which target these behavioral determinants may therefore improve pain management. Interventions which have tried to improve health care provider or patient/carer knowledge about cancer pain management and improve pain management behaviors have broadly been referred to in the literature as educational interventions. Guidelines on the anticipatory management of cancer pain stress the importance of cancer pain education [22], however there is no recognized gold standard for cancer pain education in clinical practice and, as explained previously, cancer pain management is often suboptimal in clinical practice [9]. In the last 30 years a substantial number of educational interventions aiming to improve the management of cancer pain have been subjected to clinical trials. This review aimed to synthesize this evidence and to explore whether educational interventions can improve pain outcomes. In addition this review aimed to describe the components of these interventions and the theoretical rationale for their mechanisms of action according to the original study authors. By summarizing what has been learned about cancer pain education and by identifying the key components of previous interventions, this review will inform the development of future educational interventions to tackle suboptimal cancer pain management behaviors.

Section snippets

Methods

A systematic review of systematic reviews was conducted with nested review of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) contained within selected reviews. Systematic reviews of systematic reviews are known to be useful, particularly for aiding policy and clinical decisions in healthcare when there are multiple existing reviews of a healthcare intervention [23]. By systematically identifying all reviews of cancer pain education, quality appraising existing reviews, and comparing and contrasting

Results

A PRISMA diagram is shown in Fig. 1. 2066 titles were identified by searching four databases, hand-searching bibliographies of reviews and randomized controlled trials, and checking trial registries. 27 full text articles were assessed, of which eight reviews satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the narrative synthesis [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34].

Discussion

Educational interventions to date have targeted different individuals, mostly patients, but also carers and HCPs. Reviews with strict inclusion criteria and rigorous methodology show a small but statistically significant benefit of patient educational interventions on knowledge, attitudes and pain intensity in patients with cancer. Bennett et al. [29] reported that the average benefit of education on pain intensity measures was one point out of ten on the Brief Pain Inventory (i.e. a 10%

Conclusion

Educational interventions targeted at people with cancer can improve their knowledge about cancer pain and achieve reductions in self-reported pain intensity measurements. The effect of HCP education on patients’ pain outcomes is less clear.

Practice implications

Clinicians should specifically ask about pain at clinical assessments and should be alert to recognized barriers to optimal pain management. Cancer pain is rarely a static condition, and many educational interventions have incorporated strategies to prompt timely pain reassessment.

Educational interventions, regardless of target group have common component parts which are interconnected. These elements cannot be considered in isolation, but should be considered systematically in the development

Contributions

Dr Rosalind Adam was involved in the conception of this review, study identification and selection, data abstraction, data analysis, and drafting the article.

Professor Christine Bond was involved in study selection, data analysis, and revising the article critically.

Dr Peter Murchie was involved in conception, devising database search strategies, and revising the article critically.

Funding

Dr Rosalind Adam completed this work during a clinical academic fellowship funded by NHS Education for Scotland (NES).

References (71)

  • W.H. Oldenmenger et al.

    A systematic review on barriers hindering adequate cancer pain management and interventions to reduce them: a critical appraisal

    Eur J Cancer

    (2009)
  • G.G. Cummings et al.

    Effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions to improve cancer pain management

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2011)
  • A. Koller et al.

    A systematic evaluation of content, structure, and efficacy of interventions to improve patients’ self-management of cancer pain

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2012)
  • J.A. Dalton

    Education for pain management: a pilot study

    Patient Educ Couns

    (1987)
  • R. de Wit et al.

    Improving the quality of pain treatment by a tailored pain education programme for cancer patients in chronic pain

    Eur J Pain

    (2001)
  • F.J. Keefe et al.

    Partner-guided cancer pain management at the end of life: a preliminary study

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2005)
  • R.L. Kravitz et al.

    Bedside charting of pain levels in hospitalized patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (1996)
  • R.L. Kravitz et al.

    Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment

    Pain

    (2011)
  • C.C. Lin et al.

    Long-term effectiveness of a patient and family pain education program on overcoming barriers to management of cancer pain

    Pain

    (2006)
  • M.R. Lovell et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of a standardized educational intervention for patients with cancer pain

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2010)
  • M.V. McDonald et al.

    Can just-in-time, evidence-based reminders improve pain management among home health care nurses and their patients

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2005)
  • E.I. Patiraki et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention on Hellenic nursing staff's knowledge and attitudes on cancer pain management

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2006)
  • K.L. Syrjala et al.

    Patient training in cancer pain management using integrated print and video materials: a multisite randomized controlled trial

    Pain

    (2008)
  • I. Vallieres et al.

    Effectiveness of a clinical intervention in improving pain control in outpatients with cancer treated by radiation therapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • S.E. Ward et al.

    A randomized trial of a tailored barriers intervention for Cancer Information Service (CIS) callers in pain

    Pain

    (2009)
  • N. Wells et al.

    Improving cancer pain management through patient and family education

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2003)
  • P. Yates et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-administered educational intervention for improving cancer pain management in ambulatory settings

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2004)
  • Y.K. Yildirim et al.

    Effects of pain education program on pain intensity, pain treatment satisfaction, and barriers in Turkish cancer patients

    Pain Manage Nurs

    (2009)
  • Cancer Research UK, Cancer statistics 2010. Downloaded from 〈http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/〉...
  • M.H. Van Everdingen et al.

    High prevalence of pain in patients with cancer in a large population-based study in the Netherlands

    Pain

    (2007)
  • K.L. Kuo et al.

    The pharmacoeconomics of breakthrough cancer pain

    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother

    (2013)
  • R. Adam et al.

    Why do patients with cancer access out of hours primary care

    BJGP

    (2014)
  • D.K. Mayer et al.

    Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina

    J Clin Oncol

    (2011)
  • L. Barbera et al.

    Why do patients with cancer visit the emergency department near the end of life

    CMAJ

    (2010)
  • A. De Luigi

    Analysis of reasons for admission to the emergency department for cancer patients

    Ann Oncol

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text