Elsevier

Placenta

Volume 33, Issue 10, October 2012, Pages 763-768
Placenta

The evolutionary significance of placental interdigitation in mammalian reproduction: Contributions from comparative studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.07.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The placenta is fundamental to mammalian reproduction and is surprisingly diverse in gross morphology among species. Whether and how this diversity affects maternal investment and fetal growth is still poorly understood. Contrary to suggestions that highly invasive hemochorial placentation is beneficial to fetal development, recent comparative studies have revealed that interdigitation – the degree of contact between maternal and fetal tissues at the area of exchange – strongly influences fetal growth rates. Species with labyrinthine placentae give birth to neonates of similar size to those of species with villous or trabecular placentae but in less than half the time. These findings suggest that there might be tradeoffs between fetal growth rates (higher with greater interdigitation) and gestation time (shorter with greater interdigitation), in association with type of interdigitation. Such tradeoffs might be the results of maternal-offspring conflict over the allocation of maternal resources, with paternal genes favouring greater interdigitation and so higher fetal growth, and maternal genes responding by reducing gestation time. These results emphasize the role of interdigitation as a means to increase the surface area for exchange, and are consistent with within species studies demonstrating that a higher surface area for exchange is associated with heavier neonates. Further studies could investigate the role of other traits in the evolution of placental diversity and their impact on fetal development.

Introduction

The mammalian placenta is central to reproduction, being responsible for supporting fetal growth via transfer of nutrients and oxygen from the mother to the fetus, and for disposing of fetal waste products. It is formed by the contact of extra-embryonic tissues – the chorion and the yolk sac in marsupials, and the chorion and allantois in placental (eutherian) mammals - with maternal uterine tissues [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Within this general framework, however, the placenta exhibits great interspecific diversity in gross morphology [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. In eutherian mammals the placenta can be classified, for example, by its shape (the number and distribution of the areas for nutrient exchange on the placental surface), invasiveness (the number of maternal tissue layers separating maternal blood from fetal tissues), interdigitation (the degree of contact between fetal and maternal tissues at the areas for nutrient exchange), placental weight relative to the neonatal weight, and the relative direction of maternal and fetal blood flows [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. An open question is whether placental morphology affects the rate of transplacental nutrient transfer and, as a result, fetal development, ultimately leading to the diversity in life history traits that mammals exhibit. Here I focus on the contribution of recent phylogenetic comparative studies to answering this question and investigating the evolutionary history of placental diversity, and argue that the role of placental interdigitation has been mostly overlooked but may provide an important avenue for future studies. I will first briefly present two major hypotheses proposed for the evolution of placental diversity, next discuss studies on the role of interdigitation in fetal growth, and the evolutionary history and plasticity of interdigitation, and lastly propose that future studies could focus on the evolution and implications of other placental traits for maternal investment and fetal development.

Section snippets

Maternal-offspring interactions: mutual advantage and conflict

What are the selective pressures responsible for the evolution of the morphological diversity in placentation? What are the implications of such diversity for fetal growth and maternal reproductive investment? Two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses have been proposed to answer these questions. The mutual advantage hypothesis holds that some placental characteristics enhance the rate of nutrient transfer, ultimately benefitting both the reproductive success of the mother and the development of

Interdigitation is associated with fetal growth rates

Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to diversity in other placental traits, such as interdigitation, that may have a great impact on nutrient transfer rates and fetal growth. Interdigitation refers to the degree of contact between maternal and fetal tissues at the areas of exchange [1], [2], [3], [4]. In the least interdigitated villous placentae, such as those of primates, the areas for nutrient exchange are made of branched villi, while in more interdigitated placentae the villi are

Evolutionary history of interdigitation and its plasticity during development

Several studies investigated the evolutionary history of interdigitation. There is no explicit hypothesis regarding the evolutionary history of this trait as most attention has focussed on invasiveness. However, under a mutual advantage hypothesis, one could predict that if the evolution of placental diversity reflects improved nutrient transfer efficiency, a low interdigitated placenta should be ancestral and a labyrinthine interdigitation derived. Contrary to this suggestion, a highly

Beyond invasiveness and interdigitation

Altogether, comparative studies have revealed that changes in the surface area for exchange, that directly impact fetal growth rates, are achieved evolutionarily by structural modifications leading to interspecific differences in interdigitation, while within species the placenta responds plastically to enhance the surface area for exchange in response to maternal conditions. Maternal body mass and interdigitation together explain approximately 40% of variance in gestation time in mammals [28],

Conclusions

Comparative studies of placental gross morphology can reveal key patterns of associations between placental traits and fetal development, ultimately leading to better understanding of placental evolution and function. Recent analyses have revealed that a higher degree of interdigitation – but not invasiveness – increases fetal growth rates [28], possibly because greater interdigitation enhances the surface area for exchange of nutrients. While these results highlight the importance of

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Joanna Setchell and Graham Burton for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper, Derek Wildman, Robert Barton and Anthony Carter for stimulating discussion, and the organizers of the CTR Annual Trophoblast meeting 2011 in Cambridge for the opportunity to present this work.

References (54)

  • E. Angiolini et al.

    Regulation of placental efficiency for nutrient transport by imprinted genes

    Placenta

    (2006)
  • T.J. Roseboom et al.

    Effects of famine on placental size and efficiency

    Placenta

    (2011)
  • S.H. Alwasel et al.

    Changes in placental size during Ramadan

    Placenta

    (2010)
  • D.A. Redmer et al.

    Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development

    Domest Anim Endocrinol

    (2004)
  • C.T. Roberts et al.

    Maternal food restriction reduces the exchange surface area and increases the barrier thickness of the placenta in the guinea-pig

    Placenta

    (2001)
  • N. Schlabritz-Loutsevitch et al.

    Moderate maternal nutrient restriction, but not glucocorticoid administration, leads to placental morphological changes in the baboon (Papio sp.)

    Placenta

    (2007)
  • J.N. Rutherford et al.

    Developmental plasticity of the microscopic placental architecture in relation to litter size variation in the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus)

    Placenta

    (2009)
  • A.C. Enders et al.

    The evolving placenta: convergent evolution of variations in the endotheliochorial relationship

    Placenta

    (2012)
  • A.M. Carter

    Evolution of factors affecting placental oxygen transfer

    Placenta

    (2009)
  • K. Klisch et al.

    Evolutionary differentiation of cetartiodactyl placentae in the light of the viviparity-driven conflict hypothesis

    Placenta

    (2007)
  • M.B. Renfree

    Marsupials: placental mammals with a difference

    Placenta

    (2010)
  • H. Mossman

    Vertebrate fetal membranes: comparative ontogeny and morphology, evolution, phylogenetic significance, basic functions, research opportunities

    (1987)
  • R. Leiser et al.

    Placental structure: in a comparative aspect

    Exp Clin Endocrinol

    (1994)
  • P. Wooding et al.

    Comparative placentation: structures, functions and evolution

    (2008)
  • K. Benirschke et al.

    Pathology of the human placenta

    (2012)
  • A.M. Carter et al.

    Comparative aspects of trophoblast development and placentation

    Reprod Biol Endocrinol

    (2004)
  • E. Haeckel

    Keimesgeschichte des Menschen

    (1903)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text