Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide
Introduction
Among the ways in which social inequality plays out in contemporary society, increasing attention is being paid to access and use of digital technologies (see Hargittai & Hsieh, 2013 for a review of related literature). Digital media are viewed as increasingly important resources for participating in a range of domains in today’s world and considerable research has documented how digital inequality plays out across society. Lack of basic access to or skills for exploiting these resources can have important effects on one’s relationships, work life, and overall quality of life (DiMaggio, Hargittai, Celeste, & Shafer, 2004). Disability is a major site of diversity and inequality in society, but analysis of it as such has lagged behind that of other social factors when it comes to digital media uses (for exceptions, see Dobransky and Hargittai, 2006, Ellis and Kent, 2011, Goggin and Newell, 2003, Jaeger, 2012, Vicente and López, 2010). Incorporating this variable into investigations of digital inequality is important because, unlike other social statuses, disability is one that most everyone can expect to occupy at some point in their lives (Siebers, 2008).
People with disabilities (PWD) are stigmatized and excluded in many domains of life, with consequences for their health and wealth (Shifrer, 2013; Hatzenbuehler, Phelan, & Link, 2013). In addition to being a marginalized status in its own right, disability also tends to overlap with other disadvantaged positions in society, multiplying exclusion. PWD are disproportionately represented among people with lower socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic minorities (Brault, 2012, Warner and Brown, 2011). While digital media have the potential to level the playing field for those with disabilities, relatively little research examines how PWD compare to others in incorporating such resources into their everyday lives. This paper addresses this gap in the literature.
Section snippets
Digital inequality
Digital inequalities map onto other inequalities within society. Thus, those in lower socioeconomic status groups as well as those from racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to use the Internet than those in more privileged socioeconomic and racial/ethnic groups (Bonfadelli, 2002, NTIA, 2013, Robinson et al., 2015, Witte and Mannon, 2010). While there was in the past a gender gap regarding rates of Internet access, that gap has closed in the United States and several other countries
The digital disability divide
When we look more closely at the relationship between disability and the Internet, we see that it is a story of both exclusion and possibility. While PWD face many barriers to taking advantage of the online world, Internet use nonetheless offers many means both to participate in society more fully and to create alternatives to wider exclusion in the world.
Underlying digital exclusion of PWD is the design of technology and the pace of technological change. The most widely-used hardware,
Data and methods
The data for this study come from the U.S. Federal Communication Commission’s 2009 National Consumer Broadband Service Capability Survey (NCBSCS). The survey conducted telephone interviews with a representative sample of 5005 noninstitutionalized U.S. adults. The data set was gathered through a random digit dial (RDD) sample of landline phones and an RDD sample of cell phones. The response rate was 22% for the landline sample and 19% for the cell phone sample (Horrigan, 2010). The survey asked
Digital differentiation by disability status
Table 2 shows differences between people with and without disabilities regarding their use of the Internet, their autonomy, their Web-use skills, and their online activities. We see that significantly fewer PWD use the Internet than do people without disabilities − 48% compared to 80%. Even among those with access, 67% of PWD reported high-speed, broadband connections, compared with 78% of those without disabilities. There were differences in autonomy of use as well, with PWD averaging fewer
Discussion
Findings from a national sample of American adults show that disability continues to matter when it comes to how people are incorporating the Internet into their everyday lives. The findings reveal both problems and possibilities. PWD are less likely to use the Internet, and they are less likely to engage in a range of activities even when they do use it. However, members of this group also tend to be older and from a lower socioeconomic status. Even after controlling for demographic factors,
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to John Horrigan for his work on the original data set and to Jenny Davis for comments on an earlier draft of this article. Eszter Hargittai appreciates the time made available for this research through the April McClain-Delaney and John Delaney Research Professorship at Northwestern University.
Kerry Dobransky (PhD Northwestern Sociology) is Associate Professor of Sociology at James Madison University. His research examines the varying intersections among several subfields: medical sociology, sociology of organizations, sociology of mental health, cultural sociology, health/social policy, and sociology of information and communication technologies. He is author of Managing Madness in the Community: The Challenge of Contemporary Mental Health Care (Rutgers University Press, 2014).
References (57)
- et al.
The production of disability culture among young African-American men
Social Science and Medicine
(2007) An overview of the internet of things for people with disabilities
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
(2012)Locating digital divides at home work, and everywhere else
Poetics
(2006)Assessing section 508 compliance on federal E-government web sites: A multi-method, user-centered evaluation of accessibility for persons with disabilities
Government Information Quarterly
(2006)- et al.
Psychosocial impacts of engaging in second life for individuals with physical disabilities
Computers in Human Behavior
(2015) - et al.
Designing audio-enhanced paper photos for older adult emotional wellbeing in communication therapy
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
(2014) - et al.
Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services
Government Information Quarterly
(2009) - et al.
Understanding how race/ethnicity and gender define age-trajectories of disability: An intersectionality approach
Social Science and Medicine
(2011) - et al.
Disability culture
- et al.
Disability and communication: A consideration of cross-disability communication and technology
Disability Studies Quarterly
(2012)
The ICF and its relationship to disability studies
Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey 2012, National Center for Health Statistics
Vital Health Stat.
The internet and knowledge gaps. A theoretical and empirical investigation
European Journal of Communication
Dicing with deception: People with disabilities’ strategies for managing safety and identity online
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Americans with disabilities: 2010
Tell it like it really is: A case of online content creation and sharing among older adult bloggers
Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI)
What is disability culture?
Disability Studies Quarterly
Internet use, online communication, and ties in Americans’ networks
Social Science Computer Review
Internet and the experience of illness
Internet use and depression among retired older adults in the united states: A longitudinal analysis
Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences
Making money surfing the web? The impact of internet use of US workers
American Sociological Review
Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use
The disability divide in internet access and use
Information Communication and Society
Disability and new media
Practitioner barriers to diffusion and implementation of web accessibility
Technology and Disability
Disability in the digital age
The paradox of disability culture: The need to combine versus the imperative to let go
Disability and Society
Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media
Cited by (134)
Socioeconomic or marital status? Factors driving digital inequality among single and married mothers – findings of a repeated cross-sectional study, 2014–2019
2022, PoeticsCitation Excerpt :E-government services are also considered as capital-enhancing Internet use as they offer substantial benefits to citizens, such as ubiquitous and less costly access to government services, which saves time and contributes to individuals' economic resources (Dodel, 2016). In the last two decades many studies have sought to clarify whether the Internet uses utilized by disadvantaged groups enhance their social mobility (Arie & Mesch, 2016; Mesch, Mano & Tsamir, 2012; Milioni, Doudaki & Demertzis, 2014; Rosenberg, Mano & Mesch, 2021) or extend existing social inequalities (Helsper, 2012; Helsper & Reisdorf, 2017), and whether digital inequalities are disappearing, persisting, or (re)emerging over time (Dobransky & Hargittai, 2016; Lissitsa & Chachashvili-Bolotin, 2015). In considering these issues, the social diversification and social stratification hypotheses present two different scenarios.
INCLUSION BY DESIGN: REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION WITH DIGITALLY MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES
2024, MIS Quarterly: Management Information SystemsDisability and Digital Connection in COVID-19 Times
2024, International Journal of CommunicationDigital accessibility in the era of artificial intelligence—Bibliometric analysis and systematic review
2024, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Kerry Dobransky (PhD Northwestern Sociology) is Associate Professor of Sociology at James Madison University. His research examines the varying intersections among several subfields: medical sociology, sociology of organizations, sociology of mental health, cultural sociology, health/social policy, and sociology of information and communication technologies. He is author of Managing Madness in the Community: The Challenge of Contemporary Mental Health Care (Rutgers University Press, 2014).
Eszter Hargittai (PhD Princeton Sociology) is Professor in the Institute of Mass Communication and Media Research at the University of Zurich where she heads the Media Use and Society division and directs the Web Use Project. She is also Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University. Hargittai's research looks at how people may benefit from their digital media uses with a particular focus on how differences in people’s Web‐use skills influence what they do online. She is co-editor (with Christian Sandvig) of Digital Research Confidential: The Secrets of Studying Behavior Online (The MIT Press, 2015).