Identification of biosecurity measures and spatial variables as potential risk factors for Aleutian disease in Danish mink farms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Eradication of Aleutian disease was initiated in Denmark in 1976. The prevalence of positive farms has since then been reduced from 100% to only being continuously present in the region of Vendsyssel, Northern Denmark since 2004. In this study, we attempted to identify risk factors for the infection in this region based on logistic regression of spatial (environmental, neighbourhood) variables and biosecurity measures. Information on potential biosecurity (management) risk factors in the region was obtained from interviews in 342 registered farms in the region using a structured questionnaire. A total of 279 questionnaires were completed (response rate 82%). Additional spatial variables were included in the analysis. The study shows that farm size (the number of animals in the farm) and proportion of infected neighbouring farms were significant risk factors for infection with Aleutian Mink Disease Virus. These factors account for 35% of the variation of the infection status of mink farms located in Vendsyssel during 2009. These results indicate that only a coordinated effort from the farmers in the area will succeed in eradicating the disease from Denmark, because individual farms that have eradicated the disease will be at risk of re-infection from test-positive neighbours.

Introduction

Mink plasmacytosis or Aleutian mink disease (AD) is an infectious disease caused by the Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV). The disease causes reduced litter sizes, embryonic death, stillbirth and abortions, fur damage and eventual death due to a heavy antibody response to the presence of the virus (Broll and Alexandersen, 1996). Because of its severe economic consequences, Denmark has tried to eradicate it at a national level from mink farms since 1976 (Chriél, 2000). At that time there were 2423 mink farms in Denmark, which has by 2009 been reduced to 1475; 342 of these are located in Vendsyssel, Northern Denmark. The average number of mink produced during the 2009 season (April to December) per farm was 1850 in the whole country and 1574 in Vendsyssel.

The surveillance part of the eradication program consists of mandatory testing. Farms outside the control zone (an area where the eradication effort is currently focused on, with animal movement and trade restrictions in place) must test a portion of the breeding animals from May to June and again between November and January before the mating period, while infected farms must test all breeding animals 3–6 times per year. The blood samples are tested by the counter immunoelectrophoresis test. Most farmers will stamp out the disease by culling all mink if they get a positive test, although it is not mandatory. Others choose to cull all the animals except the breeding stock which will be used to breed the next generation of animals (Mariann Chriél, personal communication). Farms that present more than three positive samples during a test are considered infected and farms with up to three positive samples are considered suspect. Transportation of animals from suspected and infected farms is restricted.

The national program has been successful to the extent of reducing the percentage of farms with AD from 100% in 1976 to 15% in 1996 (Aasted et al., 1998). Measures were initially voluntarily adopted by mink farmers. However, eradication progress declined in the late 1990s with ca. 10% farms still infected with the disease. Therefore, the first public act was put in force in 1999 and has been updated several times since then. In 2001, the percentage of infected farms was 5% (Christensen et al., 2011). The demands for improved biosecurity and disease control zones are in focus with the ultimate goal to eradicate the disease from Denmark. Since 2004, infected farms have been restricted to the region of Vendsyssel in Northern Denmark. A study by Espregueira Themudo et al. (2011) shows that the spatio-temporal distribution of AD in Denmark confirmed that Vendsyssel has persistent spatial clusters of AD, and that the farm level prevalence of the disease in these clusters is significantly higher than in the remaining of Vendsyssel. Special measures have been put in place to increase the efficiency of the eradication program, and since January 2010 a disease control zone was established around the affected area (Vendsyssel). Farmers in Vendsyssel are at present not allowed to sell animals to farms outside the disease control zone.

Studies on the strain diversity and stability of the causal agent, Aleutian Mink Disease Virus, by Christensen et al. (2011) showed that Danish isolates represent a very homogenous cluster compared with Swedish, Finnish and Dutch isolates. It seems to represent a minor fraction of the genetic diversity previously found in Denmark. This indicates that eradication progress exceeds the rate of mutation driven diversity. The finding of similar strains in the consecutive year after infection indicated disinfection procedures on infected farms not to be adequate and/or lack of biosecurity resulting in re-infection from other farms.

As an alternative to culling, vaccination has been considered as a control strategy. However, Aasted et al. (1998) found that vaccines based on capsid proteins enhanced disease (increasing the mortality rate) while vaccination with major non-structural AMDV protein only provided partial protection from AD. More recently Castelruiz et al. (2005) developed a DNA vaccine based on the gene encoding for AMDV non-structural protein 1 (NS1). They concluded that the vaccine showed partial protection with milder disease characteristics in the vaccinated mink.

It has been suggested that farmed mink can be infected from infected wild or feral mink or vice versa. Fournier-Chambrillon et al. (2004) proved that AD is present in free ranging mink by detecting AMDV antibodies in free-ranging European mink and other small carnivores in Southwestern France while Farid et al. (2010) and Nituch et al. (2011) had similar results in free ranging American mink in Canada. Danish studies from 1998–2001 showed 11% of 45 trapped free ranging mink to be test positive in the region of Vendsyssel in Northern Denmark (Willadsen and Dietz, 2009).

Control efforts in other mink producing countries are very sparsely described in the literature. Cho and Greenfield (1978) reported that Aleutian disease was eliminated from three Canadian mink farms by culling all test positive mink (a la test and slaughter) during the pelting season and before the breeding season for four consecutive years. Gunnarsson (2001) reported that Iceland successfully eradicated AD from farmed mink by pelting all mink on test positive farms (i.e. the stamping out method) during 1982–1984, reporting only a single case in 1996.

The objective of the present study was to identify risk factors for infection with AMDV in mink farms located in Vendsyssel. Focus was on spatial (neighbourhood and environmental) variables as well as information on biosecurity measures extracted from a questionnaire directed at mink farmers of the region.

Section snippets

Mink farms and testing regimes

The study concerned all 342 mink farms in the Vendsyssel region of Denmark that produced mink in 2009. Danish mink farms are required to be registered with Kopenhagen Fur and are by law given a unique Central Husbandry Register (CHR) number. Surveillance is a key element in the Danish control program. Each farmer takes blood samples from part of the breeding stock from May to July, and again before breeding between November and January and sends them to a certified laboratory. Farmers may

Results

In 2009, 327 out of 342 mink farms in production in Vendsyssel were tested for AD. The farm level prevalence of AD among tested farms in Vendsyssel in 2009 was 14.9% (95% CI: [11.5; 19.3%]). A total of 279 farms replied to the questionnaire. A total of 12 farms replied to the questionnaire, but had no AD tests performed. Of the 327 farms tested, 267 replied to the questionnaire and were included in the analysis.

Discussion

The percentage (82%) of completed questionnaires was high when compared with similar studies (Cummings et al., 2001). Also, there was no significant association between responding to the questionnaire and infection status, which indicates that the chance of completing the questionnaire was not related to the infection status of the farm (i.e. no self-selection due to infection status of the farm).

A farm was classified as AD-positive according to the legislation if more than three animals tested

Conclusions

Aleutian disease is endemic in Vendsyssel region with farm-level prevalence at 15%. Farm size and percentage of infected farms within a 5 km distance were significantly associated with farm infection status.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, project number 09-065034/FTP and by Kopenhagen Fur, Denmark.

References (25)

  • G. Espregueira Themudo et al.

    Persistent spatial clusters of plasmacytosis among Danish mink farms

    Prev. Vet. Med.

    (2011)
  • A.H. Farid et al.

    A survey of Aleutian mink disease virus infection of feral American mink in Nova Scotia

    Can. Vet. J.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Lesser housefly (Fannia canicularis) as possible mechanical vector for Aleutian mink disease virus

      2018, Veterinary Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, continuous reinfection of farms has been reported despite significant efforts towards disease eradication (Farid et al., 2012). The resistance of the virus to both physical and chemical agents (Eterpi et al., 2009; Hussain et al., 2014) and risk factors such as proximity to infected farms or AMDV infection in the preceding season have been indicated as possible causes of AMDV reinfection (Christensen et al., 2011; Espregueira-Themudo et al., 2012). Recently, it has been reported that AMDV is present and widely distributed in different areas and elements of AD-infected farms, suggesting that reinfections may be caused by the extreme persistence of AMDV in the farm environment (Prieto et al., 2017); thus, movement of contaminated fomites such as cages, working instruments or even people, can be involved in the spread of AMDV.

    • Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms

      2017, Veterinary Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Establishment of these control programs produces an early and significant reduction in the prevalence of the disease, which later slows down despite most farms maintaining test-and-removal strategies without interruption, mainly due to the re-infection of farms (Farid et al., 2012). In this regard, it has been demonstrated that the presence of AMDV infection on a farm in the preceding season, the farm size or the proximity to infected neighboring farms are risk factors for farm reinfection (Christensen et al., 2011; Espregueira-Themudo et al., 2012; Farid et al., 2012). Other suggested possibilities that could explain the failure of these control programs include diagnostic difficulties, the persistence of AMDV in the environment, transmission through infected wild fauna or even the virus strain (Farid et al., 2012).

    • Application of real-time PCR to detect Aleutian Mink Disease Virus on environmental farm sources

      2014, Veterinary Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, our results show that the assessment of environmental contamination must include as many areas as possible, since the virus was not only present in samples from surfaces in direct contact with animals, but also in warehouses, vehicles, dining rooms/meeting areas, drive-through disinfection baths, soil from truck ruts and silos. Even though disease control programs include restricting the transportation of animals from suspicious and infected farms, it is not uncommon for reinfection to occur on AMD-free farms (Christensen et al., 2011; Espregueira Themudo et al., 2012). Although it is assumed that aerogenous transmission is possible, it has not been demonstrated yet, and results from several studies do not suggest that it has an important role in transmission between farms (Christensen et al., 2011; Espregueira Themudo et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text