Mini-symposium: Biomarkers and PhenotypeBiomarkers for pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: challenges and recommendations
Introduction
A biomarker is defined as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic response to therapeutic intervention” [1]. Biomarkers are increasingly used in clinical research and practice as a diagnostic and/or prognostic adjunct. There is however, a constant need for evaluation of biomarkers to ensure accuracy and reproducibility of such outcomes. This review will consider the use of biomarkers in the pediatric demographic with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) focusing on the biomarkers currently classified for PAH, their potential to ameliorate the disorder, and recommendations on how some challenges involving the application of biomarkers could be tackled.
PAH, a condition characterized by increased pulmonary arterial blood pressure and resistance in the arterial vasculature of the lung [2], may arise as an idiopathic disorder, or is often associated with secondary disorders [3]. PAH is a disease of many etiologies where the right heart and the lungs are adversely affected directly or indirectly through pathologies of other organs. The ensuing right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy and eventual right heart failure leads to high mortality [4]. The current accepted classification for pulmonary hypertension (PH) is provided in Table 1 [3]. The current clinical classification system categorizes PH into five groups with the most common form of pediatric PH falling in the category of Group I (PAH). This group accounts for approximately 90% of the incidence [5]. As in adults, the diagnosis of PAH in children is often delayed with the exception of PAH associated with congenital disorders [2]. Thus, the utilization of biomarkers that are sensitive, accurate, and reproducible has the potential to greatly improve early diagnosis, relevant prognosis, and more effective treatment in pediatric PAH.
For children with PH, the Netherlands data registry reported an incidence of 63.7 cases per million, with a majority of those cases belonging to PAH diagnosis (57.9 cases per million children) [6]. Although PAH in children is more rare than in adults, the incidence reported is comparable to the adult demographic with a reported incidence of 7.6 cases per million annually and a prevalence of 52 cases per million [7]. There is very limited data available on the registries with respect to pediatric PAH because of the smaller sample size of children with PAH and because of the lack of standardized assessment in early registries [8]. To overcome this, studies have been conducted to further our understanding of pediatric disease epidemiology data [9], and survival rates for children diagnosed with PAH have been reported in several studies [6], [10]. Children are treated with either mono- or combination therapy, drug-specific therapy, treatment with calcium channel blockers, and bosentan [11]. A study conducted by the UK Pulmonary Hypertension Service for children [12] reports survival rates of approximately 90.5, 82.8 and 64.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Survival rates of 96, 84, and 74% for 1, 3, and 5 years respectively have recently been reported for children with IPAH/FPAH (familial) and APAH-CHD (associative) [13]. Similar studies further support these data [6], [10], [14]. There are data, however, that show differences in survival rates between children with IPAH compared with APAH [6], [12], [13]. Gender difference is an important factor for PAH in children, with higher occurrence observed in females than in males (2:1 ratio) [15].
Right Heart Catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard for diagnosis of PH [16], which is defined (in part) as a mean pulmonary artery pressure of greater than or equal to 25 mm Hg. Typically, echocardiography (echo) is used as an initial screening tool, followed by RHC when pulmonary artery pressures are estimated to be elevated by echo [17]. Unfortunately in many cases, RHC fails to confirm a finding of PAH suspected by echo [18]. Biomarkers that would help inform the clinical decision to go/not go for RHC in the child with elevated pulmonary artery pressure as assessed by echo would greatly obviate unnecessary and expensive RHC (and the associated risks) for children who did not need it.
With therapy options more standardized for the adult PAH demographic, the therapeutic approaches to children with PAH can vary significantly depending on the experience of the clinical center and the medical team [19]. Although there are similarities in adults and children in terms of PAH pathobiology and patient response to therapeutic interventions [20], [21], [22], children are not small adults. Thus, the use of biomarkers in pediatric PAH should preferably be based on objective data in a systemized manner that incorporates etiology, developmental age, and gender differences with regard to prognostication, treatment, and evaluation of treatment efficacy. For this review, we have arbitrarily divided biomarkers for pediatric PAH into two classes: biochemical and imaging.
Section snippets
Biochemical biomarkers of pulmonary hypertension
Over the past several years excellent reviews on biomarkers and their application in PAH have been published [23], [24], [25]. However, these reviews have focused on adult PAH. The ideal biomarker for any disease would involve a measurement that is convenient, simple to perform, painless, and affordable, while offering high specificity and low incidences of false negatives and positives [2]. A superior biomarker (or set of biomarkers) would possess the aforementioned qualities while
Imaging biomarkers for pulmonary hypertension
As mentioned above the gold standard for diagnosing PH is RHC, yet its invasiveness renders it unsuitable as a “screening” test for PH. We have also mentioned some non-invasive tools that could be placed in the arsenal of potential biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes.
Specific recommendations and challenges for application of biomarkers in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension
The utilization of biomarkers will continue to increase. There is great potential for specific biomarkers to be able to provide information that helps in early diagnosis of a diseased state, response to therapeutic treatments, disease pathophysiology and relevant outcome of disease progression [2], [25], [38]. Even though there are several biomarkers for use in adult PAH, application to the pediatric demographic is limited both in clinical studies/research and in clinical practice. PAH in
Future research directions
- •
Most of the biomarkers studies in the recent years have focused mainly on adult PH. Although there is some crossover correlation between adults and children, future studies should focus on the pediatric demographic. Age, gender and development progression (even within the pediatric group) affects how the pathology presents itself.
- •
A call to collaborate; since pediatric PAH is rare, prospective studies with multi-center contribution and evaluation would increase sample size and thus provide
Educational aims
The reader will come to appreciate that:
- •
Pediatric pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) is rarer than adult PAH and in both cases the diagnosis is often delayed (with the exception of PAH associated with congenital diseases).
- •
The resulting right ventricle (RV) hypertrophy and eventual right heart failure from PAH is a cause of high mortality in both the adult and pediatric demographic.
- •
Biomarkers are a necessity as a diagnostic/prognostic adjunct in children with PAH given limitations with
Conflicts of interest
None
Acknowledgements
All authors contributed equally to this review.
References (85)
- et al.
Four- and seven-year outcomes of patients with congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (from the REVEAL Registry)
Am J Cardiol
(2014) - et al.
Characteristics and prospective 2-year follow-up of children with pulmonary arterial hypertension in France
Arch Cardiovasc Dis
(2010) - et al.
Hemodynamics in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current and Future Perspectives
Am. J. Cardiol.
(2012) - et al.
The Potential of Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Am. J. Cardiol.
(2012) - et al.
Biomarkers in pulmonary hypertension: What do we know?
Chest
(2013) - et al.
Usefulness of red cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in pulmonary hypertension
Am J Cardiol
(2009) - et al.
Breath analysis in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Chest
(2014) - et al.
Independent association of urinary F2-isoprostanes with survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Chest
(2012) - et al.
Increased tissue endothelial progenitor cells in end-stage lung diseases with pulmonary hypertension
J Hear Lung Transplant
(2012) - et al.
Brain natriuretic peptide levels in managing pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
Chest
(2009)