Elsevier

Psychiatry Research

Volume 225, Issue 3, 28 February 2015, Pages 458-463
Psychiatry Research

How connected are people with schizophrenia? Cell phone, computer, email, and social media use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.067Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fifty-six percent of subjects use text messaging, 48% have an email account.

  • Twenty seven percent of subjects use social media sites daily (Facebook the most popular).

  • Many current users agreed that these technologies increase socialization.

  • Many patients are interested in mobile technologies playing a role in treatment.

Abstract

Technologies such as Internet based social media network (SMN) websites are becoming an important part of many adult lives; however, less is known about their use in patients with schizophrenia. We need to determine (1) how “connected” are patients with schizophrenia?, (2) do these technologies interfere with the patient׳s illness?, and (3) do patients envision these technologies being involved in their treatment? We recruited 80 inpatients and outpatients age 18–70 with schizophrenia to complete a brief survey on the prevalence and frequency of cell phone, text messaging, computer, email, and SMN use, and associated attitudes. 56% of subjects use text messaging, 48% have an email account, and 27% of subjects use SMN sites daily, with Facebook being the most popular. Many current users agreed that these technologies help them interact/socialize more, expressed interest in receiving text messages from their doctors, and disagreed that these technologies make symptoms worse. These preliminary findings should be investigated in larger samples, but suggest that these technologies afford a unique opportunity to engage and improve treatment for some patients with schizophrenia.

Introduction

The use of technologies such as smartphones, tablets, and Internet based social media network (SMN) websites is becoming an important part of many adult lives. A December 2013 Pew Research survey found that 90% of US adults own a cell phone, and 81% of cell phone owners use them to text (http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet). This Pew Research survey found that 58% of American adults have a smartphone, and 42% of American adults own a tablet computer (http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet). A January 2014 Pew Research survey found that 73% of online adults use social networking sites, of which Facebook (71%) was also the most popular (http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet).

The impact of these technologies on healthcare will be more prominent as they become more available to individuals suffering from chronic illness. Applications made for smartphones and tablets along with SMN websites could aid in the treatment of individuals with chronic illness. However, less is known about SMN, cell phone, text messaging, and general computer use in patients with schizophrenia. Several previous studies have investigated the prevalence of cell phones, computers, and/or Internet use, as well as the acceptability and efficacy technology-based interventions in patients with schizophrenia (described in Table 1). Improved missed appointment rates, medication adherence, and prodromal and other symptom assessment have been shown in studies using SMN or text-based applications on cell phones for individuals with schizophrenia (Ainsworth et al., 2013, Ben-Zeev et al., 2014, Montes et al., 2012, Palmier-Claus et al., 2012, Palmier-Claus et al., 2013, Sims et al., 2012, Välimäki et al., 2012). Certain aspects and patterns of an Internet profile and SMN use could be related to schizophrenia spectrum disorders (Krishna et al., 2013). Actions on SMNs could also contribute to or exacerbate some psychiatric symptoms, including delusions, suspiciousness, depression, and/or anxiety (Martin et al., 2012, Nitzan et al., 2011).

In order to get a better understanding of how SMNs and other technologies play a role in the lives of patients with schizophrenia, we need to better describe the prevalence and frequency of use, and experience with these technologies to determine (1) how “connected” are patients with schizophrenia? (2) do these technologies interfere with the patient׳s illness? and (3) do patients with schizophrenia envision these technologies being involved in their treatment? We conducted a survey of patients with schizophrenia to begin to address these questions.

Section snippets

Subjects

80 inpatients and outpatients with a schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were recruited to complete an anonymous 5–10 min pencil-and-paper survey to examine the prevalence and frequency of cell phone, text messaging, computer, email, and social networking website use, whether these technologies interfere with the subject׳s illness, and to what extent subjects would like to see these technologies involved in their treatment. Questions were designed by two of the study investigators (BJM and

Results

A description of the study sample is given in Table 2. Of the 80 survey respondents, one or two did not provide information on age, sex, race, and marital status. The mean (S.D.) age of survey respondents was 41 (13), the sample was 51% male, and the mean age at first psychiatric hospitalization was 23 (10). A majority of the sample was of African descent (56%) and single (63%).

Table 3 describes the prevalence and frequency of current cell phone, computer, and email use. Of the 80 survey

Discussion

We found that 56% of subjects use text messaging, 48% have an email account, and 27% of subjects use SMN sites daily, with Facebook being the most popular. Many current users agreed that these technologies help them interact/socialize more, expressed interest in receiving text messages from their doctors, and disagreed that these technologies make symptoms worse.

The strength and limitations of our study should be considered. An important strength is that we assessed not only the prevalence of

Disclosures

In the past 12 months, Dr. Miller has received grant/research support from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and GRU; and honoraria from Medscape and Insight Consulting Group.

Dr. Stewart has nothing to disclose.

Dr. Schrimsher has nothing to disclose.

Dr. Peeples has nothing to disclose.

In the past 12 months, Dr. Buckley has served as a consultant for the NIMH, and has received grant/research support from Sunovion and the NIMH.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Niju Philip, MS for assistance.

References (27)

  • P. Cuijpers et al.

    Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review

    Cognitive Behavioral therapy

    (2009)
  • C.A. Depp et al.

    Mobile interventions for severe mental illness: design and preliminary data from three approaches

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (2010)
  • E. Granholm et al.

    Mobile Assessment and Treatment for Schizophrenia (MATS): a pilot trial of an interactive text-messaging intervention for medication adherence, socialization, and auditory hallucinations

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (2012)
  • Cited by (89)

    • Can cognitive remediation therapy be delivered remotely? A review examining feasibility and acceptability of remote interventions

      2022, Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      This finding is in line with the health beliefs model, which states that individuals are less likely to participate in interventions if they perceive barriers towards participation (Jones et al., 2015). Over 45% of individuals with psychotic disorders do not have access to a computer (Miller et al., 2015), which poses a significant barrier to remote treatment. In instances where participants do not have access to their own personal computers, it may be important for institutions to provide computers to access CR, however, in some cases it may not be economically viable for institutions to provide these devices, thus, limiting the feasibility of remote CR.

    • Engagement with online psychosocial interventions for psychosis: A review and synthesis of relevant factors

      2021, Internet Interventions
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, older age has been associated with higher rates of dropout and disengagement from psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia and early psychosis (Anderson et al., 2013; Villeneuve et al., 2010). Consistent with the general population (Poushter, 2016), a negative association has been demonstrated between age and Internet use amongst individuals with psychosis (Baup and Verdoux, 2017; Miller et al., 2015; Robotham et al., 2016; Thomas et al., 2017; Välimäki et al., 2017; Villagonzalo et al., 2019). Although, one study did not find an association amongst individuals with early psychosis (Fernández-Sotos et al., 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text