Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 122, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages 99-104
Public Health

Review Article
The delivery and organization of public health in England: setting the research agenda

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.003Get rights and content

Summary

The publication of Best Research for Best Health highlighted the need for the NHS Service and Delivery Organisation (SDO) Programme to develop a programme of research on public health service delivery and organization. This paper reviews the need for this research by reviewing recent policy documents and public health research activity. The paper outlines the role of the SDO Programme in relation to other current developments and discusses how these respond to the need to develop research on public health and what the research priorities are.

Introduction

The re-organization of primary care trusts (PCTs) and strategic health authorities in England in the autumn of 2006 has highlighted their important strategic public health role. In addition, recent changes to the quality outcomes framework (QOF), which provides financial incentives for undertaking specific activities1 in general practice, have focused attention on developing health promotion and prevention activities in primary care. Similarly, in Scotland and Wales, public health continues to be a key focus on health policy and political debate, although without the added complication of major organizational upheaval. However, despite the growing significance of public health as a policy priority, the Healthcare Commission's annual ‘State of healthcare’ report2 identifies the prevention of illness and the reduction of health inequalities as one of the four areas where further action is needed, arguing that healthcare organizations should give ‘sufficient priority to investment in the promotion of health and well-being—notwithstanding the current pressures on NHS finances’ (p. 13). Possible reasons for the lack of priority include the following: an evidence base in regard to public health delivery and organization that remains weak and undeveloped compared with other areas of healthcare delivery; and a failure to apply evidence even where it does exist for reasons not fully understood and themselves in need of research. The future capacity and capability of the public health function (health protection, health improvement and health service quality improvement) will depend crucially on being underpinned and informed by appropriate investment in research and development (R&D) and by an ability to exploit its potential to improve health and tackle health inequalities.

Since 1997, numerous developments in the area of public health have attempted to stimulate research and strengthen research capacity, address health inequalities, develop organizational workforce capacity, and strengthen the public health workforce and develop its skills.3, 4, 5 None of these initiatives has strengthened research capacity significantly. There is no disagreement that public health and the reduction of health inequalities are now key public policy goals and central to the achievement of an effective health service.6, 7, 8 However, research has tended to concentrate on descriptions of health states and socio-economic inequalities in health rather than on the impact and cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. The publication of ‘Best research for best health’9 in 2006 renewed the attention on developing and expanding research on public health service delivery and organization. The need for such research was highlighted by Derek Wanless in his second report reviewing the state of public health.7 He was critical of the absence of research on the effectiveness of interventions and on how services should be organized to ensure their effective delivery.

This article examines the development of public health research following publication of the Department of Health's 2001 public health research strategy developed in response to concerns about research and the evidence base raised in the Government's 1999 White Paper on public health, ‘Saving lives: our healthier nation’.10 The focus is on England but much of the wider context relating to the position and development of public health research is relevant to the UK in general and possibly beyond, since issues of funding and weak infrastructure are not unique to the UK. It argues that little research has addressed the delivery and organization of public health despite the increasing use of targets and performance measures to direct public health activity. In ‘Best research for best health’, the Government signalled its intention to address the research deficit in this area by directing the National Health Service's Service Delivery and Organization (SDO) R&D Programme to commission research on public health.9 This article will consider the context behind this move and outline how the SDO Programme is responding to ‘Best research for best health’ and where this fits into current developments in public health research and health services research more generally following publication of the review by Cooksey in late 2006.11

Section snippets

Developing public health: challenges for research

The current framework for the delivery of public health services in England is the White Paper, ‘Choosing health’, which provides an analysis of the main public health problems and sets out how the Government and other public agencies plan to address these.8 Key priorities include tackling health inequalities, reducing the number of people who smoke, tackling obesity (especially among children), improving sexual health, improving mental health and well-being, and encouraging sensible drinking.

Developing public health research

The development of public health R&D has become a key priority of central government but, as with public health itself, the scope of public health R&D is similarly wide ranging and relates to whether research which is of indirect importance to public health is included together with work that is of more direct relevance. Two categories of research were identified in the late 1990s:26

  • research that addresses issues of population health directly, e.g. immunization for communicable diseases; and

Responding to the challenge: the role of the SDO Programme

The SDO Programme was established in 2000 to consolidate and develop the evidence base on the organization and delivery of healthcare services. By producing and promoting the use of research evidence about how the organization and delivery of services can be improved, the SDO Programme aims to increase the quality of patient care, ensure better strategic outcomes and contribute to improved public health—although it has not previously commissioned research that is explicitly concerned with

Conclusion

Despite the development of health research policy since 2001, public health research is an area that requires further investment and capacity strengthening. The call for new public health research centres of excellence provides one mechanism for developing research that is embedded in priorities identified within public health and by national policy. In addition, there is to be a second call within the NPRI. However, the specific and distinctive focus of the SDO Programme on the organization

References (35)

  • J. Connelly et al.

    National survey of working life in public health after ‘Shifting the balance of power’: results of first survey

    Public Health

    (2005)
  • Delivering investment in general practice: implementing the new GMS contract

    (2003)
  • State of healthcare 2006

    (2006)
  • A research and development strategy for public health

    (2001)
  • Acheson D (Chair). Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office;...
  • Tackling health inequalities: summary of the 2002 cross cutting review

    (2002)
  • D. Wanless

    Securing our future health: taking a long-term view

    (2002)
  • D. Wanless

    Securing good health for the whole population

    (2004)
  • Choosing health: making healthy choices easier

    (2004)
  • Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy

    (2006)
  • Saving lives: our healthier nation

    (2004)
  • D. Cooksey

    A review of UK health research funding

    (2006)
  • The NHS in England: operating framework for 2007–08

    (2006)
  • Our health, our care, our say

    (2006)
  • S. Burke et al.

    Public health skills audit 2001—research report

    (2001)
  • S. Peckham et al.

    The new public health worker

  • G. McClean et al.

    Deprivation and quality of primary care services: evidence for persistence of the inverse care law from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2006)
  • Cited by (7)

    • LSE–Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19

      2021, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      Where necessary, we recommend enactment of legislation to mandate such changes. The profession of public health has long had a core task of being the population's health advocate, but this central leadership role has been successively undermined by changes in health services over the past 3 decades.470,471 The role requires re-examination to establish what leadership models should look like in the future.

    • The state of the public health system in England

      2008, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      To learn more about how a public health system is conceived by a range of those working in public health in the NHS, local government and related agencies, a scoping study was commissioned by the NIHR Service Delivery and Organization's (SDO) research and development programme from a team based in the Wolfson Research Institute at Durham University. The purpose of the review was to inform the SDO's public health research call.11 With major, and seemingly continuous, public service reform affecting the organization and delivery of policies and services, there is little published evidence of the impact of recent changes on the public health system.

    • People-centred public health

      2012, People-Centred Public Health
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text