Radiotherapy of NPCUpdate report of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypothesis of the optimal margin
Section snippets
Patients and pretreatment evaluation
Between November 2003 and May 2007, a total of 414 histologically diagnosed non-metastatic NPC patients treated primarily with IMRT according to an IRB-approved institutional treatment protocol11 at the Cancer Hospital of Fujian Medical University were enrolled in this study, including 312 male and 102 female patients, with a median age of 45 years old (range 11–86). Pretreatment evaluation consisted of a complete history and physical examination, flexible fiberoptic endoscopic examination,
Treatment outcome
The median follow-up time for the entire group of patients was 60 months (range, 5–92 months). All patients were able to complete the whole course of irradiation without treatment interruption because of acute toxicities. Two patients died of nasopharyngeal ulceration (i.e., grade V toxicities). Five and 1 patients developed grade III and IV hearing impairment, respectively. No xerostomia over grade III was observed.
At the time of their last follow-up, a total of 95 patients (22.9%) had treatment
Discussion
Although Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0225 and 0615 have provided a practical reference for the delineation of CTVs for NPC [2], [3], the rationale for the definition of CTV delineation at the level of the nasopharynx for the primary disease has not been optimized. We have previously demonstrated that definitive treatment using a reduced volume for CTV produced an acceptable outcome of 3 years [11]. This update demonstrated that IMRT treated with reduced CTV maintained an excellent
Conclusions
Our 5-years’ experience of using a reduce-volume technique during IMRT treatment for NPC showed a very high local control rate, the strategy we delineated the target was safe and reliable. Defining CTV using GTV + margin + the whole nasopharyngeal mucosa, especially for the patients with early T disease is feasible. We suggested that it can be determined by the margins of T4 patients as follows: CTV = GTV + margins (anteriorly 7, posteriorly 3.3, laterally 7.5, superiorly 9.7, inferiorly 14.3) + whole
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program of Fujian, People’s Republic of China.
References (23)
- et al.
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. An update of the UCSF experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2002) - et al.
Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The Hong Kong experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2004) - et al.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharynx cancer. Update of the Memorial Sloan–Kettering experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2006) - et al.
Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The National Cancer Centre Singapore experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2009) - et al.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2009) - et al.
Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995) - et al.
How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2011) - et al.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review
J Radiat Oncol
(2012) - Radiation therapy oncology group protocol 02-25. Available at: http://www.rtog.org/ members/protocols/0225/0225.pdf...
- Radiation therapy oncology group protocol 06-15. Available at: http://www.rtog.org/ members/protocols/0615/0615.pdf...
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A prospective study on disease control and preservation of salivary function
Cancer
Cited by (116)
Significance of radiologic extranodal extension in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis: a comprehensive nomogram
2024, Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyDiffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Dose Painting in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
2022, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsCitation Excerpt :Additionally, no toxicities led to treatment discontinuation during chemoradiotherapy. Our results showed that the DWI-guided DP-IMRT regimen did not increase acute toxicities compared with conventional MRI-based IMRT in patients with NPC, as reported by Lin et al16 and Lee et al.22 The toxicity profile of this study was also similar to our previous study which applied PET/CT-guided DP-IMRT.34 In our present study, a single (0.8%) patient with primary tumor invasion to the ipsilateral parotid gland and metastatic lymph node invasion to the contralateral parotid gland in the conventional MRI-based IMRT group had grade 3 dry mouth.