EDITORIALConflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2005 International Consensus Conference on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations
Section snippets
Summary of COI procedures
Each participant in the 2005 evidence evaluation process completed and submitted both an ILCOR and an AHA COI disclosure form before attending the 2005 Consensus Conference.3 Late registrants were required to complete the COI disclosure forms when they registered on-site. AHA staff reviewed the forms and ensured that completed versions of both forms were submitted by each conference participant and worksheet author. ILCOR task force cochairs (e.g. cochairs of the Basic Life Support, Advanced
Results of COI Policy implementation
All 380 participants in the 2005 Consensus Conference completed COI disclosure forms, most before the conference. Staff added information from late registrants to daily updates of the COI disclosure booklet and slides. Although a few reminders were needed on the first day of the conference, all conference participants quickly adopted the habit of giving their name and participant number whenever they spoke.
COI cochairs investigated and recommended resolution for 8 concerns before the conference
References (3)
- ILCOR conflict of interest policy and procedures. Available at: http://www.c2005.org. Accessed June 21,...
Cited by (19)
Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations
2010, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Commercial relationships were considered at every stage of the evidence evaluation process and, depending on the nature of the relationship and their role in the evidence evaluation process, participants were restricted from some activities (i.e., leading, voting, deciding, writing, discussing) that directly or indirectly related to that commercial interest. While the focus of the process was the evaluation of the scientific evidence, attention was given to potential COI throughout the CoSTR process.5–7 This policy is described in detail in Part 4: “Management of Potential Conflicts of Interest.”8
Part 4: Conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International consensus conference on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations
2010, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :COI co-chairs investigated and recommended resolution for a number of issues that arose during the conference. None of the COI issues required interruption of discussion or convening of the Ad Hoc COI Committee (each of these events did occur once in C2005).3,4 No anonymous calls were received on the COI hotline.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary
2010, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Final wording of science statements and treatment recommendations was completed after further review by ILCOR member organisations and the editorial board.2 The comprehensive conflict of interest (COI) policy that was created for the 2005 International Consensus Conference40 was revised for 2010.41 Representatives of manufacturers and industry did not participate in either of the 2005 and the 2010 conferences.
Scientific knowledge gaps and clinical research priorities for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care identified during the 2005 International Consensus Conference on ECC and CPR Science with Treatment Recommendations. A Consensus Statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care ...
2007, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :The AHA established two additional task forces on stroke and first aid. Each task force identified topics that required evidence evaluation and appointed international experts to review these topics with strict attention to conflicts of interest and transparency of process.5,6 Each topic was assigned to a minimum of two reviewers who represented two different ILCOR member organisations, and most assigned reviews were completed.
Part 1: Introduction
2005, Resuscitation