Original Research
Ontario family physician readiness to collaborate with community pharmacists on drug therapy management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.02.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Empirical evidence suggests that pharmacist-physician collaboration can improve patients' clinical outcomes; however, such collaboration occurs relatively infrequently in the community setting. There has been little research on physicians' perspectives of such collaboration.

Objective

To ascertain Ontario family physician readiness to collaborate with community pharmacists on drug therapy management.

Methods

The survey instrument was based on the transtheoretical model of behavior change. It enquired about 3 physician behaviors that represented low-, mid-, and high-level collaboration with pharmacists. The survey was distributed by fax or mail to a random sample of 848 Ontario family physicians and general practitioners, stratified by practice location (urban/rural).

Results

The response rate was 36%. Most respondents reported conversing with community pharmacists about a patient's drug therapy management 5 or fewer times per week. Eighty-four percent reported that they regularly took community pharmacists' phone calls, whereas 78% reported that they sometimes sought pharmacists' recommendations regarding their patients' drug therapy. Twenty-eight percent reported that they sometimes referred their patients to community pharmacists for medication reviews, with 44% unaware of such a service. There were no differences in physician readiness to engage in any of the 3 collaborative behaviors in urban versus rural settings. More accurate patient medication lists were perceived as the main advantage (pro) of collaborating with community pharmacists and pharmacists' lack of patient information as the main disadvantage (con). Collectively, perceived pros of collaboration were positive predictors of physician readiness to collaborate on all 3 behaviors, whereas perceived cons were negative predictors for the low- and mid-level behaviors. Female physicians were more likely than males to seek pharmacists' recommendations, whereas more experienced physicians were more likely to refer patients to pharmacists for medication reviews.

Conclusions

Overall, Ontario physicians were more engaged in the low- and mid-level collaboration with community pharmacists with respect to drug therapy management. The strongest predictor of physician readiness to collaborate was perceived advantages of collaboration.

Introduction

Medication-related errors have been shown to be a significant problem affecting patient care in the ambulatory setting.1, 2, 3, 4 In recent years, increasing attention has been focused on strategies to enhance the safety and effectiveness of drug prescribing and use. Collaboration between community pharmacists and family physicians is one of these strategies. There is considerable evidence that pharmacist involvement on hospital teams favorably impacts patient care, reducing mortality rates and adverse drug events.5 In the community setting, pharmacist-physician collaboration on drug therapy management has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in several chronic disease states.6, 7, 8 Health care authorities and organizations in Canada and the United States have expressed support for collaborative patient care9, 10 and/or increased pharmacist-physician collaboration.11, 12, 13

Since the 1990s, the pharmacy profession has increasingly embraced a patient-centered philosophy of practice termed pharmaceutical care, a key component of which involves close collaboration with physicians on drug therapy management.13 Individual pharmacists have expressed strong interest in collaborating with physicians; however, such collaboration occurs infrequently in the community setting.14 Pharmacists have identified a number of barriers to the implementation of pharmaceutical care, including their own attitudes, lack of time, space, training, reimbursement, and management support. Another consistently mentioned barrier is lack of cooperation from physicians.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 However, there have been few attempts to research the physician's point of view on collaboration with pharmacists, especially in Canada.21, 22, 23

The primary objectives of this study were to determine Ontario family physician readiness to collaborate with community pharmacists on drug therapy management and the potential predictors (sociodemographic and attitudinal) of their readiness to collaborate. Based on the work of McDonough and Doucette,24 we postulated that, because physicians and pharmacists often share a greater number of patients in rural settings and are more likely to interact socially in their local community, rural physicians are more likely to collaborate with pharmacists in the management of patients' drug therapies. Therefore, a secondary objective was to examine whether physician readiness to collaborate varies across urban and rural settings.

The conceptual framework for this study of pharmacist-physician collaboration was the transtheoretical model of behavior change.25 This model describes behavior change as a series of stages: precontemplation, when individuals are not considering changing their behavior; contemplation, when they are thinking about it; preparation, when they are taking concrete steps toward it; and action, when they have changed their behavior. The model also proposes that individuals continuously weigh the advantages (pros) of changing their behavior against the disadvantages (cons), and that the relative perceived importance of the pros increases and that of the cons decreases as individuals progress through the stages of change. Another predictor of change included in the model is self-efficacy, or the individual's situation-specific confidence. Finally, the model proposes a number of processes (mental or physical) used to progress through the stages (eg, substituting desirable behaviors for undesirable ones). Although the model has been widely used to study patient behavior,26, 27 it has only been used in 4 studies of physician readiness to change pertaining to cancer-screening and smoking cessation-counseling practices.28, 29, 30, 31

Section snippets

Methods

A stratified random sample of 848 community-based family physicians and general practitioners in Ontario was surveyed. Specialists, hospital-based or retired physicians, and those practicing outside of Ontario, were not eligible. The sampling frame used for the survey was the 2006 electronic version of the Canadian Medical Directory.32

Results

The overall survey response rate was 36%; it was higher for surveys distributed by fax (38%) than by mail (30%). Of the 848 physicians surveyed, 36 declared themselves ineligible to participate (eg, not in family medicine), whereas 6 mailed surveys were undeliverable. Of the 297 returned questionnaires, 12 were deemed ineligible according to the demographic information provided, whereas another 5 were eliminated because of significant (greater than 35%) missing data. Thus, 280 useable surveys

Discussion

High proportions of family physicians reported regularly taking community pharmacists' phone calls and sometimes seeking community pharmacists' recommendations, whereas few family physicians reported sometimes referring their patients to pharmacists for medication reviews. Adverbs in the aforementioned action statements have been italicized to highlight the fact that the stated frequency of the behavior was not standardized across the 3 collaborative behaviors. Thus, although it appears that

Conclusions

This study of Ontario family physicians' readiness to collaborate with community pharmacists on drug therapy management was the first to investigate interprofessional collaboration using the transtheoretical model. It showed that family physicians were more likely to collaborate with community pharmacists on low- to mid-level collaborative behaviors; that these physicians directly communicated with pharmacists very infrequently on drug therapy issues; and that physicians' perceptions of the

References (44)

  • M.R. Goulding

    Inappropriate medication prescribing for elderly ambulatory care patients

    Arch Intern Med

    (2004)
  • C. Zhan et al.

    Suboptimal prescribing in elderly outpatients: potentially harmful drug-drug and drug-disease combinations

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2005)
  • P.J. Kaboli et al.

    Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review

    Arch Intern Med

    (2006)
  • M. Machado et al.

    Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part I: systematic review and meta-analysis in diabetes management

    Ann Pharmacother

    (2007)
  • M. Machado et al.

    Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part II: systematic review and meta-analysis in hypertension management

    Ann Pharmacother

    (2007)
  • E.E. Roughead et al.

    Pharmaceutical care services: a systematic review of published studies, 1990 to 2003, examining effectiveness in improving patient outcomes

    Int J Pharm Pract

    (2005)
  • Putting Patients First: Patient Centered Collaborative Care

    (July 2007)
  • Interprofessional care: a blueprint for action in Ontario

    (August 2007)
  • R.J. Romanow

    Building on Values: the Future of Health Care in Canada. Final Report

    (2002)
  • Pharmacist scope of practice: position paper

    Ann Intern Med

    (2002)
  • Blueprint for pharmacy: the vision for pharmacy

  • McKesson Canada

    Trends and insights: community pharmacy in Canada

  • Cited by (23)

    • Integrated primary care insomnia management in Australia

      2018, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many of these novel clinical roles involve pharmacists' collaboration with other health professionals, especially at the primary health care interface, such as with General Practitioners (GPs).3–5 However, despite robust evidence for the evolving role of pharmacists in clinical services, they are still underutilized and collaborative approaches between GPs and pharmacists to deliver health care services remain suboptimal.6 Several factors that may influence GP-pharmacist collaboration have been reported, and include fragmented communication between these health professionals, location of the pharmacist, their lack of access to patient medical records and lack of opportunity to make shared decisions about patient care.7–9

    • Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2014, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is evidence that non-dispensing or clinical services provided by pharmacists in the outpatient setting may result in improved patient outcomes and prescribing patterns.2 Despite this, the uptake of these services is low and collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners is suboptimal.3,4 Limitations of most models of GP-pharmacist collaboration in primary care include geographical isolation, poor communication, and lack of time and remuneration for team activities.5,6

    • Consumers willingness to use a medication management service: The effect of medication-related worry and the social influence of the general practitioner

      2013, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      This result reinforces the powerful effect that a person's GP has over health-related decisions. Although HMR shares many attributes with other international medication review services provided in the United States,14 Canada,56 New Zealand,57 or the United Kingdom,11 it cannot be assumed that the findings of the present study would necessarily apply to these services. The generalizability of the study may be limited by the relatively low response rate.

    • Patients' willingness to use a pharmacist-provided medication management service: The influence of outcome expectancies and communication efficacy

      2012, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Random telephone calls or postal delivery could also be used to recruit respondents. Although HMR shares many attributes with other international medication review services provided in the United States,13 Canada,48 New Zealand,49 or the United Kingdom,12 it cannot be assumed that the findings of the present study would necessarily apply to these services. For patients who are at risk of experiencing medication-related problems, a lack of willingness to use medication management services is potentially a safety issue.

    • Interdisciplinary Cooperation between Pharmacists and Nurses—Experiences and Expectations

      2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text