Antisaccade task performance in patients at ultra high risk for developing psychosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.06.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Patients with schizophrenia consistently perform worse than healthy controls on the antisaccade task in which the subject is required to inhibit a reflexive saccade to a suddenly appearing visual target and look in the opposite direction. To our knowledge there is no research yet showing how patients at ultra high risk (UHR) for developing psychosis perform on the antisaccade task. The aim of the present study was to investigate antisaccade task performance in UHR patients. Patients were eligible for the study when they met criteria for one or more of the following groups: Attenuated symptoms or brief limited intermitted psychotic symptoms or a first-degree family member with a psychotic disorder and reduced functioning or basic symptoms. In 35 UHR patients we assessed antisaccades, neuropsychological test performance and symptomatology. Antisaccade task results were compared with those obtained in 42 age- and intelligence-matched patients with recent-onset schizophrenia and 28 matched healthy controls. Antisaccade error rate was significantly higher in the UHR patients than in the controls. Schizophrenia patients performed worse than the UHR patients and the control subjects. We found a trend towards higher antisaccade error rate at baseline in the UHR patients who later made the transition to psychosis compared to the UHR patients who did not make the transition to psychosis. Poor spatial working memory function was related to increased antisaccade errors in the UHR group. Abnormal antisaccade task performance is also present in patients at UHR for developing psychosis. Subsequent research needs to clarify if increased antisaccade error rate is predictive of a psychotic episode. In UHR patients, poor antisaccade performance may reflect working memory dysfunction.

Introduction

The antisaccade task generates the most frequently observed volitional saccade abnormality in schizophrenia (Crawford et al., 1996, Fukushima et al., 1990). In the antisaccade task, subjects are asked not to look at a suddenly appearing visual target but to make a saccade in the opposite direction at a similar distance from the central fixation point. It has been suggested that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is involved in suppressing reflexive saccades, and that the frontal eye fields trigger the correct saccade to the opposite side (Muri et al., 1998). It is unknown how patients at ultra high risk (UHR) for developing psychosis perform on the antisaccade test.

The development of schizophrenia is generally preceded by a prodromal phase in which there is a clear deterioration from a previous level in functioning. The length of this prodromal phase is extremely variable and varies from weeks to years.

The mechanism by which this prodromal state evolves into psychosis is not really understood (Hodges et al., 1999). Additionally, to predict whether the symptoms of a prodromal state evolve in a psychosis or not, is also not yet possible. The retrospective term ‘prodrome’ therefore cannot appropriately be applied to prospective investigations (Yung et al., 2003). The term ‘ultra high risk’ has been used to indicate a subthreshold syndrome that can be regarded as a risk factor for subsequent psychosis within the next year, but that psychosis is not inevitable (Yung et al., 2003).

McGorry et al. (1995) were able to define three groups thought to be at ultra high risk of developing a psychotic disorder. Group 1: Attenuated psychotic symptoms defines a group of people who have symptoms that deviate from normal phenomena but which are not frankly psychotic e.g. ideas of reference, odd beliefs and paranoid ideation. Group 2: Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms (BLIPS), defines a group that has symptoms of psychotic intensity but which are very infrequent, or which have a total duration of less than 7 days before resolving spontaneously. Group 3: Trait and state risk factors, defines a group who have non-specific symptoms such as lowered mood or anxiety symptoms plus some trait-risk factors for psychotic disorder, either a schizotypical personality disorder or a family history of a psychotic disorder in a first-degree relative. The non-specific symptoms must have a duration of at least 1 month and must be associated with marked disability or decrease in functioning. 20 of 49 subjects considered as belonging to an ultra high risk group as mentioned above (40.8%) developed a psychotic disorder within 12 months (Yung et al., 2003). Thus 59% did not. If UHR patients would be treated with antipsychotic medication, 59% would receive medication that was not indicated. Therefore, it is important that the percentage correct prediction of psychosis is increased.

Cognitive abnormalities have been reported in UHR subjects. Hawkins et al. (2004) found that UHR patients performed at levels intermediate to population norms and data reported for schizophrenia samples on a comprehensive neuropsychological exam. In the context of normal intelligence, this intermediate status suggests that, as a group, these subjects are not fully normal in neuropsychological functioning. Wood et al. (2003) found spatial working memory disorders in UHR patients. Working memory is fundamental to the human ability to reason and make judgments that rely on remembered contextual information and is thought to be mediated mainly by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Beardsley, 1997). The relationship between antisaccade errors and neuropsychological test performance in UHR subjects is yet unexplored.

The first aim of the present study was to investigate antisaccade task performance in patients at UHR for developing psychosis. If antisaccade task performance is reduced in UHR patients, further research is warranted to elucidate if this test could enhance the percentage correct prediction of psychosis. The second aim was to investigate the relationship between neuropsychological tests and antisaccade task performance to gain insight into underlying pathological mechanisms of antisaccade task performance in UHR patients.

Section snippets

Subjects

Thirty-five patients (five women) with a UHR of developing psychosis were assessed with the antisaccade test. Mean age was 20.1 years ± 3.7, SD. The UHR patients were referred to the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands by psychiatrists and psychologists for a second opinion with the question whether a psychotic development was taking place. The exclusion criteria were: previous psychotic episode for more than one week (as assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis,

Results

Fig. 1 depicts the number of UHR patients falling into the four inclusion groups. Most patients fell in more than one inclusion category.

Examples of antisaccades in an UHR patient and a control are shown in Fig. 2. Three wrong antisaccades are depicted in the registration of the UHR patient and three correct antisaccades in the control subject.

Mean and standard deviation of the antisaccade and neuropsychological outcome variables in the UHR and schizophrenia patients and control subjects are

Discussion

We found antisaccade error rate in a group of UHR patients to be significantly higher than in controls but not as high as in a matched schizophrenia sample. Furthermore, our results showed a trend towards higher antisaccade error rate at baseline in the UHR patients who later made the transition to psychosis compared to the UHR patients who did not make the transition to psychosis. The percentage of errors in the antisaccade task increased with decreased working memory function (SWMT) in the

Role of the funding source

This study was funded by grant QLGU-CT-2001-01081 from the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium. The European Commission had no further role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

Author Hiske Becker included patients in the study and was involved in clinical assessments concerning transition to psychosis. Reinaud van de Fliert was involved in recruiting patients into the study and clinical assessments. Niels Plat assessed patients neurophysiologically and contributed to the statistical analysis of these data. Lo Bour wrote the eye movement recording protocol and supervised eye movement recording and analysis. Hans Koelman was involved in the design of the study. Maria

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We thank Thijs Boerée for his help with the analysis of the eye movement data.

References (26)

  • T.J. Crawford et al.

    Saccadic abnormalities in psychotic patients. I. Neuroleptic-free psychotic patients

    Psychol. Med.

    (1995)
  • T.J. Crawford et al.

    Abnormal saccadic distractibility in patients with schizophrenia: a 99mTc-HMPAO SPET study

    Psychol. Med.

    (1996)
  • A. Hodges et al.

    People at risk of schizophrenia: sample characteristics of the first 100 cases in Edinburgh high-risk study

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • Cited by (54)

    • The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Evidence from eye-tracking measures

      2022, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evidence suggested that aberrant performances of eye movement were also observed prior to the onset of psychosis. For instance, altered indicators, including increased error rates of the anti-saccade (Nieman et al., 2007; Obyedkov et al., 2019), pro-saccade (Obyedkov et al., 2019), and memory-guided saccade tests (Caldani et al., 2017) along with prolonged anti-saccade latency (Kleineidam et al., 2019), were frequently reported in CHR population. Additionally, eye movement indexes were observed to be associated with levels of psychological stress in intensive care unit nurses (Ahmadi et al., 2022) and were also altered in the individuals diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Coll et al., 2022), suggesting the potential of eye movement metrics as markers of psychological stress (Skaramagkas et al., 2021).

    • Neurocognitive and neurophysiological endophenotypes in schizophrenia: An overview

      2020, Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Physiological mechanism underlying AS are complex and appear to depend on competitive stimulus selection in the superior colliculus [60]. Patients suffering from SCZ show longer latencies to correct eye movements in AS tasks, when compared to HC [61], which likely reflects a lack of inhibitor control [62]. Studies in unaffected FDR of SCZ probands have reported an intermediate degree of AS deficits in those individuals [63].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text