Trajectories of response to treatment with atypical antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia pooled from 6 double-blind, randomized clinical trials☆
Introduction
Schizophrenia is a devastating mental illness affecting approximately 24 million people worldwide (World Health Organization Statistics on Schizophrenia, 2010). Though some patients experience dramatic symptom improvement in response to currently available antipsychotic treatment, 70% of patients fail to show even minimal response early in treatment (Ascher-Svanum et al., 2008, Kinon et al., 1993, Kinon et al., 2008) and over the longer term, medication will effectively treat only about half of patients (Lieberman et al., 2003). Identifying the earliest possible point at which a given degree of response is indicative of how a patient will respond over the longer term if that treatment is continued could minimize patient exposure to ineffective, potentially even harmful medication, and allow for earlier assessment and adjustment of medication to achieve optimal outcome. Until recently, these analyses have identified patients with early response to treatment by using a prespecified threshold for measures assessed early in treatment. For instance, patients with ≥ 20% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay et al., 1987) Total score at Week 2 were identified as Early Responders and those with less response at Week 2 were identified as Early Non-Responders. Such strategies produced dichotomous categories, possibly excluding a patient from a clinically relevant response category. As an example, a patient with a 19% improvement in PANSS Total score at Week 2 may not have differed qualitatively from a patient with a 20% improvement at that time point, though the former would have been identified as a Non-Responder, and the latter as a Responder. Even when change over multiple time points was considered, mean values for improvement over time were usually presented by treatment group as smooth lines which did not provide a sense of the heterogeneity within each group, nor the likely overlap between them.
Using varied statistical methods, others have investigated these longitudinal profiles to reveal latent classes of response within the heterogeneity of treatment response trajectories over time. Trajectory analysis characterizes and identifies subgroups of patients who differ in response to treatment and identifies baseline characteristics that help distinguish to which subgroup a given individual may belong (Muthén et al., 2002, Muthén and Shedden, 1999). These methodologies have been applied to datasets from clinical trials of treatments for schizophrenia (Case et al., 2010, Levine and Leucht, 2010, Levine and Rabinowitz, 2010, Levine et al., 2010a, Levine et al., 2010b, Marques et al., 2010; Table 1).
In this post hoc analysis of data pooled from 6 clinical trials, our objective was to describe trajectories of response for a large population of patients with chronic schizophrenia, and to assess whether patient characteristics at baseline are associated with specific response trajectories. This analysis differs from those previously published because it examines response trajectories in a heterogeneous population, primarily patients in the chronic phase of schizophrenia who were treated with antipsychotics for up to 24 weeks.
Section snippets
Studies included in the analysis
Data were pooled from 6 randomized, double-blind multi-center comparator trials of at least 24 weeks in duration to include the widest range of patient characteristics that enrolled patients who were chronically ill with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revised). This analysis included only those patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. In each study, olanzapine was compared to
Response trajectories
Trajectory analysis of PANSS Total scores for all patients in the included studies who were diagnosed with schizophrenia and over the 24-week follow-up period revealed 5 distinct response trajectories as described in Table 3 and as shown in Fig. 1. For purposes of discussion, definitions of mildly, moderately, markedly and severely ill, and minimally and much improved are based on research by Leucht et al., 2005, Leucht et al., 2007 in which PANSS scores were compared with simultaneous CGI
Discussion
In this post hoc analysis, we used the methodology of trajectory analysis to identify distinct groups of response to atypical antipsychotic treatment for 24 weeks in patients with schizophrenia from 6 randomized clinical trials. Trajectory analyses were first used in psychiatry recently by Levine and Rabinowitz (2010) to describe symptom response in patients with early-onset schizophrenia in a 24-week randomized clinical trial. Over the first 4 weeks, patients in 4 of the 5 resulting trajectories
Role of funding source
Funding for this study was provided by Eli Lilly and Company.
Contributors
Virginia Stauffer, PharmD, provided direction of analyses and drove, reviewed, and approved content of manuscript. Michael Case, MS, directed analyses, reviewed, provided comments, and approved manuscript content. Sara Kollack-Walker, PhD, Haya Ascher-Svanum, PhD, Haya Ascher-Svanum, PhD, Tamara Ball, MD, Shitij Kapur, MD, and Bruce Kinon, MD, reviewed, provided comments, and approved manuscript content.
Conflict of interest
Virginia Stauffer, PharmD, Michael Case, MS, Sara Kollack-Walker, PhD, Haya Ascher-Svanum, PhD, Shitij Kapur, MD, and Bruce Kinon, MD, are employees of Eli Lilly and Company (the sponsor of this research). Tamara Ball, MD, is an employee of i3 Statprobe, a vendor of Eli Lilly and Company.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Angela Lorio, BS; Angela Goldsberry, BS; Joseph Durrant, BS; Casey Brackney, BA; and Janice Carlson, PhD of i3 Statprobe for their assistance with the manuscript.
References (28)
- et al.
One-year double-blind study of the neurocognitive efficacy of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(2006) - et al.
Predicting response to atypical antipsychotics based on early response in the treatment of schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(2008) - et al.
What does the PANSS mean?
Schizophr. Res.
(2005) - et al.
Elaboration on the early-onset hypothesis of antipsychotic drug action: treatment response trajectories
Biol. Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Clinical, functional, and economic ramifications of early nonresponse to antipsychotics in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia
Schizophr. Bull.
(2008) A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia
Br. J. Psychiatry
(1989)- et al.
Olanzapine versus ziprasidone: results of a 28-week double-blind study in patients with schizophrenia
Am. J. Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
The heterogeneity of antipsychotic response in the treatment of schizophrenia
Psychol. Med
(2010) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology
(1976)- et al.
The Quality of Life Scale: an instrument for rating the schizophrenic deficit syndrome
Schizophr. Bull.
(1984)
A 28-week, randomized, double-blind study of olanzapine versus aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia
J. Clin. Psychiatry
The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia
Schizophr. Bull.
Treatment of neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenic relapse
Psychopharmacol. Bull.
A 24-week randomized study of olanzapine versus ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in patients with prominent depressive symptoms
J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This study was supported by Eli Lilly and Company and all authors (except Dr. Ball) are employees of Eli Lilly and Company.